Questions raised – again – by comments of departing Archbishop of Canterbury

Justin Welby resigned today as Archbishop of Canterbury over the scandal of a ‘horrific’ serial molester of young men and boys who was allowed to continue his crimes for years after Welby’s failure to raise the alarm with police. Welby is a thoroughly Establishment figure who played his role in preventing a government of genuine change when he amplified and reinforced the antisemitism smear scam used to topple Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader.
But in his departing comments Welby claimed that he had believed that his office did inform the Metropolitan police, in 2013, about paedophile barrister John Smyth, who molested some 130 victims – and that he had ‘believed wrongly that an appropriate resolution would follow’.
Welby apparently made no further enquiry and that is more than enough to justify his resignation, given the extent and gravity of Smyth’s crimes.
But his comment raises serious questions. It’s unthinkable that a report of such a matter, if Welby’s officials did make one, would not have crossed desks at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – particularly given Smyth’s profession as a barrister – and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), head of the CPS, until November 2013, was one Keir Starmer.
During Starmer’s tenure, the CPS also refused to prosecute serial rapist Jimmy Savile. Starmer’s allies have always claimed he did not personally have a role in that decision, although that in itself would raise questions if a serial-rape case involving the UK’s highest-profile entertainer, a close friend of politicians and royals, had not been referred to the DPP. The CPS said that it destroyed all records of who made the decision, as it says it did of its records regarding the planned extradition, also during Starmer’s period in the role, of journalist Julian Assange to the US.
Starmer has similarly claimed he didn’t know, as DPP, about the massive Post Office scandal that ruined, and in some cases cost, the lives of hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly prosecuted for fraud because of an unfit Post Office accounting system.
If Welby is telling the truth about his office’s referral of Smyth’s crimes to the Met, is this another scandal that somehow evaporated as it passed through the CPS? The question needs to be asked – and Keir Starmer needs to be made to give clear answers for once.
And the questions about Starmer and sex offenders and abusers are not limited to his time as DPP. Labour whistleblower Elaina Cohen today said that ‘there is no difference’ between Welby and Starmer because of their cover-ups of abuse. Ms Cohen repeatedly warned Starmer and then-Labour general secretary David Evans that a Labour party staffer working for then-Perry Barr MP Khalid Mahmood – and allegedly Mahmood’s lover – was engaged in ‘sadistic’ and ‘criminal’ abuse of vulnerable Muslim women fleeing domestic violence, through the now-defunct domestic violence ‘charity’ that she ran.
Despite the repeated warnings, Starmer and Evans did nothing. Mahmood remained on Starmer’s front bench as long as he chose to be there, while Cohen was sacked from her role as a parliamentary aide. One of the staffer’s victims gave evidence, at Cohen’s successful wrongful dismissal tribunal, of the abuse she and others had suffered – including blackmail and sexual exploitation. Her evidence was not challenged by Mahmood or his lawyers and Mahmood admitted under oath to the tribunal that he had also personally made sure that Starmer was fully aware of Cohen’s allegations.
Starmer also turned a blind eye to the horrific abuse of Poplar and Limehouse MP Apsana Begum. Instead, the party briefed against her to their media allies and tried to manoeuvre her out of her seat – and even to have her jailed on trumped-up housing fraud charges that a court rightly threw out.
When then-Chester MP Chris Matheson was under investigation by Parliament for sexual harassment, neither Starmer nor the party machine suspended Matheson pending the outcome of the investigation, as would be usual practice to protect the women around him. Matheson ultimately resigned when found guilty by the parliamentary panel of ‘threatening’ sexual misconduct. Starmer also protected at least two further alleged sex pests on his front bench, despite ongoing investigations – and readmitted Neil Coyle back into the parliamentary party despite Coyle’s record of racism and sexual harassment.
And the party under Starmer ignored the advice of its barrister that it must thoroughly investigate allegations of ‘serious’ sexual assault brought against then-Redbridge council leader and slum landlord Jas Athwal, a right-wing Labour figure close to Health Secretary Wes Streeting. Instead, the NEC dropped the case and reinstated Athwal, who is now a Labour MP after a questionable vote to select him as the party’s candidate in Ilford South.
The cover-up of Elaina Cohen’s whistleblowing has never been examined by the so-called ‘mainstream’ media in the four years since Skwawkbox first exposed it, and numerous further revelations since. That needs to change – because Starmer’s record, and Welby’s parting comments today, raise questions that need to be answered – and not to become the subject of yet another cover-up.
SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount as it has to be entered by us). Alternatively, if you prefer to make a one-off or recurring donation by simple card payment, please use the form below:
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyThanks for your solidarity so Skwawkbox can keep doing its job of inconveniencing the right and helping to build the left!
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6f/d1/7a/6fd17af048e10364769e8701c588c0ec.gif
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Toffee 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Off topic:
A discussion on the Amsterdam disturbances and politics in football from Al Jazeera English:
What a match in Amsterdam says about Israel’s future in football | The Take
Is this Welby’s Thomas Becket moment?!
One would trust that Welby is unlikely, like Becket, to be canonised by the Pope and “venerated as a saint and martyr by the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion”?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Becket
Though knowing the levels of self-entitlement and exceptionalism of the British Oligarch Establishment, one cannot be too sure?
Well what is it with keef and molesters. Meanwhile keef had no problem jailing women who couldn’t meet the evidential threshold after being raped. https://womenagainstrape.net/keir-starmers-record-on-rape/
…”When under 3 per cent of reported rapes lead to a conviction, rapists have almost complete impunity. Sir Keir didn’t feel strongly enough against rape to confront police sexism, racism and other prejudices, and press for better investigations when he had the power to do so.”
Thanks Jillazzouz.
And the evidential threshold for rape is so high that so many rapists get away with their crimes. To jail women just for not meeting this threshold is very dangerous. As seen with the 15 year old rape victim.
Well what is it with keef and molesters.
You have to understand that keef didn’t go to a proper public school like Eton, Harrow, Winchester, Fettes etc, but so desperate is he to be part of the network that he’s fully adopted and embraced their vices (for want of a more apt term) as well as their airs & graces.
He got to where he is by being the sordid, diminutive creep he is; sucking
offup to the old boy clique, rather than by any sort of diligence.His time as DPP demonstrates that spectacularly. Allowing all sorts of establishment suspects off the hook while charging exorbitant rates to the taxpayer for perks he should never have been able to procure.
The ordinary Joe is paying in several ways for the establishment’s
proxyuseful idiot.too true. as i warned repeatedly, SIR Starmer Keith Rodney Kid Starver Liar Warmonger Genocide Denier UK Soil er, Ethnic cleansing Enabler, Makes nasties Nastier and Smarmy Smarmier 🪰🪳🪱🪰🪳🪱🪰🪳🪱; is and ALWAYS will be bad Bad BAD news…
… by choice. HIS CHOICE to protect the most sordid of The Establishment.
TRAGICALLY, worse is afoot. MUCH worse is to come. Check his record. There’s no end to his depravity and not a milligram of shame as he seeks to please his masters.
Is this ANOTHER file the CPS has ‘lost’?…
Things get covered up all the time such as the coup in the United States in 1963 in which President Kennedy was killed.
The Guardian recently did a feature on iconic US presidential photographs.
One of these was LBJ being sworn in after President Kennedy was assassinated.
It says: “…Kennedy’s body had been loaded onto the plane 15 minutes before…”
It does mention why that was. Texas law required that the autopsy be carried out in Texas. Secret Service Agents Roy Kellerman and William Greer had gone to the hospital and seized the body at gunpoint. They could not have done that on their own initiative.
A Vice President who was not involved in the assassination of his predecessor would be expected to let the doctors at Parkland Hospital do their job and carry out the autopsy so that any information that arose from it would become available immediately.
“When Jackie Kennedy arrived, still in her blood-stained suit…”
What the article does not mention is that she could easily have changed out of those clothes. Indeed, that suit might have yielded clues as to the direction of the shooting. Over the years, a number of stories have surfaced which claim that Jackie Kennedy suspected that Vice President Johnson had a central role in her husband’s assassination.
It seems that she suspected this immediately. A member of her entourage once stated that she refused to change her clothes because she wanted the people responsible to see what they had done. The most obvious person to see her would, of course, be Johnson.
What the Guardian article also fails to mention is that Cecil W. Stoughton’s photographs included one that was hidden away for years: the one that showed an exchange of winks between now-President Johnson and his close ally, Congressman Albert Thomas.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/jacqueline-kennedy-reportedly-believed-lyndon-b-johnson-behind-jfks-assassination?msockid=0e38af5ea3126b011d16ba68a2716a64
Error:
It should read:
“It does not mention why that was”