Jeremy Corbyn – as even a prominent Labour right-winger acknowledged today – hammered Theresa May during Prime Minister’s Questions over the issue of the hugely-abused Windrush generation:
Corbyn relentlessly pushed May over her and her successor as Home Secretary’s conscious and racist mistreatment of UK citizens legally in this country – and rounded off by demanding of the Speaker that ‘she’ resign.
Rudd and May appeared to be confused about which of them should go:
Of course, there’s an easy – and perfectly logical – solution to that ‘conundrum’. May instigated the policies that have led to such distress for Windrush citizens, while Rudd continued and intensified them.
They must both go.
And this evening, astonishingly, even the BBC – which routinely covers for Tory lies and did so for May’s PMQs lie about Windrush last week – is discussing exactly that as a perfectly realistic scenario.
The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.
If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.
They obviously both have guilty consciences, hence the confusion.
Oddly the BBC has interpreted this as the Tories giving a ‘robust defense’
I’m no expert but I’ve never heard of bowling out 2 bats with one ball – although I suppose they are old ones.
To me this not an either/ or question – the correct answer is that both should go.