Analysis Announcement Breaking

15 victims of Jewish Chronicle smears demand action from regulator

Jo Bird and others wronged by right-wing rag ask IPSO chair to initiate proper standards investigation after repeated breaches

Fifteen victims of the lies and smears of the right-wing Jewish Chronicle have written to the chair of press ‘regulator’ IPSO to demand action against the Jewish Chronicle, after the paper’s smears continued following IPSO’s ‘training’ whitewash of the paper’s ‘litany of lies’ against left-wingers and supporters of Palestinian human rights.

In an open letter, the group outlines the history of the paper’s wrongs and the lack of meaningful action by IPSO, which is run by the papers it is supposed to keep in line:

31 July 2023

Dear Lord Faulks,

We are individuals who have experienced the consequences of bad journalism and bad editorial conduct by the Jewish Chronicle. Each one of us has secured a ruling from IPSO against this publication and/or won libel settlements.

We write to you, once again, to urge IPSO to undertake a standards investigation into this publication. We found the decision of the IPSO board not to order such an investigation in December 2021 disappointing and based on spurious reasoning. Your letter of 23 December 2021 explained that your refusal was in part because of a ‘change of ownership’ in 2020, and ‘new editorial leadership’ in 2021. As you are no doubt aware, that change of ownership appears to have been driven by financial losses largely occasioned by libel payouts resulting from poor journalism. The change of editor in fact took place when its editor of 13 years resigned only 72 hours before IPSO’s meeting to discuss this issue on 14 December 2021.

At that time IPSO had found 33 breaches of the code of conduct by the JC in three years, in which period there had also been four admissions of libel (Appendix 1 contains a table of the most egregious of these breaches). This was in our view a shocking level of non-compliance, equivalent to one breach in every four issues published over the period1, yet the IPSO Board considered two training sessions to be sufficient remedy.

We read in the recent review of IPSO by Sir Bill Jeffrey that, in February of this year, IPSO declared that ‘sufficient improvements had occurred in both complaints handling and editorial standards to allow the cessation of active monitoring of standards’ at the Jewish Chronicle. This conclusion is surprising to us given that, between December 2021 and the publication of that report, IPSO had upheld three further complaints against the Jewish Chronicle and the paper had also (to our knowledge) been obliged to take down one further article. These further adjudications are listed in Appendix 2.

Only two months after the IPSO board decided to take no further action against the Jewish Chronicle, and three weeks before the publication of Sir Bill Jeffrey’s report, yet another complaint against that publication was upheld, involving three separate breaches of the code of conduct and a finding that it had behaved unacceptably. To quote paragraph 19 of that adjudication: ‘The committee expressed significant concerns about the newspaper’s conduct prior to the publication and the absence of a published apology as part of the remedial action which had been taken. The committee considered that the publication’s conduct was unacceptable, and their concerns were drawn to the attention of IPSO’s standards department.’

We hope that IPSO will now recognise that the mere provision of training failed to resolve the serious and systemic journalistic and editorial problems at the Jewish Chronicle. Sir Bill Jeffrey wrote that an IPSO standards investigation is only likely to happen if malpractice is egregious and comes out of the blue or if ‘IPSO conclude that their engagement is getting nowhere and a stronger response is needed’. It is surely obvious now that IPSO is getting nowhere with the Jewish Chronicle and that a stronger response is needed.

The Jewish Chronicle shows no signs whatsoever of improvement. Every one of the post-2021 adjudications includes reference to one or more of ‘significant inaccuracy’, ‘significantly misleading’ reporting, and ‘unacceptable’ conduct.

If this continuing record of journalistic failure and malpractice does not amount to a ‘serious and systemic’ breach of IPSO’s code of conduct, we would welcome your comments and clear explanation of what exactly would be required to amount to such a breach. As it is, we feel that IPSO has let us down, and continues to leave itself open to further and justified criticism of inadequacy in the face of overwhelming evidence of journalistic malpractice.

We urge you to recommend a standards investigation to your board, and to do so urgently – in weeks rather than months – before more bad journalism is published, more falsehoods are disseminated among readers and more harm is done to innocent people.

The appendix mentioned in the letter to IPSO details some of the egregious instances of the Jewish Chronicle’s abuses and IPSO’s own rulings against the right-wing rag:

In addition, the paper has been forced to pay out damages and make apologies for a ‘string of false claims‘ and inventions targeted at left-wing figures and supporters of Palestinian human rights, including to Liverpool legend Audrey White and to Black rights activist Marc Wadsworth.

As the letter notes, IPSO was reported to be considering a full standards investigation in 2021, but ultimately decided to whitewash the huge issues with the paper’s conduct by issuing ‘training’, despite the overwhelming evidence of the Chronicle’s obstructiveness and lack of standards, which even IPSO has been forced to criticise. Yet the paper’s wanton breaches of journalistic standards barely even paused for breath after that decision, as the appendix table shows.

IPSO has been criticised by victims of so-called ‘mainstream’ papers – including victims of illegal phone hacking – as a ‘sham’ regulator that exists to create the ‘illusion of reform’. If IPSO wishes to continue to claim regulator status, it’s time for action that doesn’t involve whitewash or carpet edges to sweep these huge wrongs under.

SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount). Thanks for your solidarity so SKWAWKBOX can keep doing its job.

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. Good luck to them

    …But it’s IPSO. Why there’s an I in there, I don’t know.

  2. To Jo, Audrey,Mike and all the other decent people maligned by the Jewish Chronicle
    Please do not dignify this appalling rag by referring to it as a”paper”- its standards are so low it makes the S*n appear to be a reputable publication.
    The primary aim of the Jewish Chronicle seems to be to discredit anyone who believes in universal Human Rights,recognises that Palestinians are human beings and deplores the human rights abuses Israel inflicts on innocent Paletinians, babies and little children included.
    All of you have defended these poor people very effectively and have been targeted by this dreadful rag as a result. You should all be very proud.

  3. IPSO is better than nothing but its powers can’t stop the propaganda machine. The only way we can do that is to have thoroughly democratic media and that won’t arrive till we’ve dismantled the rule of the rich. The propaganda system is the most valuable tool of the rich, without it, they would flounder. It’s a stunningly effective system and the redress we have peripheral and insignificant. The JC is small circulation but it does a vital job in keeping the myths about Israel alive. Freedom of speech is a great principle. The JC should be permitted to publish. But so should we and we can’t because no one will put up the money for anything significant. Not even the rich celebs who support Palestinian rights.

    1. IPSO is worse than nothing because it promises false hope and a belief that ‘the system’ is regulated; the same false hope that the ombudsman sytem promises to represent the intrests of the public.

  4. In descending order, we have The Beano – great that it is celebrating its 85th anniversary at the moment, the MSM, with its shameful reporting of so much that is important, but which it finds difficult to report straight, such as what is actually going on in the Labour Party, and finally, the Jewish Chronicle, which seems to get most things upside down, back to front, and inside out, with not an apparent care in the world.
    In a proper democracy such things as press responsibility and transparency are vital principles that serve the best interests of the electorate.
    I am sure that effective, independent and rigorous press regulation would also save the JC a fortune in legal bills!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: