Site icon SKWAWKBOX

MPs and peers say: “We condemn political interference in disciplinaries. Except when we want it”

Complete lack of self-awareness among MPs as dire as it is unsurprising

Around thirty Labour peers and sixty MPs have signed a letter, with no discernible trace of irony, demanding that Jeremy Corbyn show ‘leadership’ by overturning yesterday’s barrister-led decision to re-admit Derby North MP Chris Williamson into the party after his suspension since February.

Many of those same MPs are the same who screamed foul when the Murdoch press has misleadingly claimed Corbyn or his aides interfered in disciplinary issues.

Their message seems to be that political interference is fine, as long as they agree with the outcome.

The MPs are also referring to calls for an independent body to adjudicate Labour disciplinary issues – yet are outraged by a decision reached because of the advice of independent barristers.

Those same independent barristers presumably judged that Williamson had done nothing antisemitic, since that was the conclusion of the 3-person panel – a panel with an anti-Corbyn majority.

Are we to take it that, like political interference, independence is only acceptable if it reaches the desired result?

These MPs – very few surprises among them – shame and expose themselves.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

Exit mobile version