Special measures package includes direct oversight of meetings and investigation of individuals by Labour’s governance unit
Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) has imposed a series of special measures on the conduct of party officials in the Labour-run London borough of Enfield.
Meetings of the council’s Labour group had already been banned until 1 April – except by special permission and with NEC oversight -after a series of complaints of disgraceful behaviour by officials and their allies.
- ‘irregular’ conduct of council candidate selections by council leader Nesil Caliskan, who at the time was secretary of Enfield’s Local Campaign Forum (LCF)
- the deselection of all the borough’s black councillors
- threats and intimidation of whistleblowers
Groups representing the borough’s ethnic communities have publicly expressed their outrage at events – an outrage shared across the full left-right spectrum of Enfield Labour, leading to a series of resignations and calls for the national party to take action:
- half of Enfield council’s Labour cabinet wrote to the party demanding action and a full investigation
- all of the Labour group’s female officers resigned in protest at the bullying, except for the council leader Caliskan
- black councillor Don McGowan resigned his seat in protest
- a black candidate also resigned in protest
- local Labour members (CLPs) passed motions condemning Caliskan’s behaviour
NEC sources say that the allegations were discussed at this week’s full meeting of the NEC, which agreed that the following extensive package of special measures – although without using that specific term – be imposed on the borough with immediate effect:
- an NEC observer must be present at all meetings of Enfield council’s Labour group, to be reviewed after six months
- annual elections for the position of council leader, instead of the normal elections for the full term
- a package of clean-up measures including:
- NEC observers at annual general meetings (AGMs) of all three Enfield CLPs and of the LCF
- all Westminster and local candidate selections will be overseen by the NEC
- no councillors/candidates will be allowed any involvement in selection processes
- selected candidates must be representative of the borough’s ethnic diversity of local community
- ID checks at meetings
- a review of local Labour membership lists
In addition, the individual members of the party facing allegations regarding their conduct have been referred to the complaints section of the Governance and Legal Unit (GLU) for investigation.
Cllr Caliskan has previously told the SKWAWKBOX that she does not wish to be contacted for comment. However, when the ban on meetings was revealed, she attempted to portray it as a measure taken at her request rather than imposed by the NEC – but the SKWAWKBOX revealed information disproving that claim.
In spite of the complaints made by a political and ethnic cross-section of the local party and community, Caliskan has also claimed that the complaints are racially motivated.
A group of right-wingers in Enfield have attempted to dismiss the evidence and allegations brought by local members and elected officials and covered exclusively by the SKWAWKBOX. However, the NEC’s decision to impose special measures shows that they are being treated as serious and credible by Labour’s NEC.
The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.
If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.