W Brom West CLP asks Formby for urgent investigation into suspect Brandhall affiliations

brandhall 2.png

The SKWAWKBOX has been covering at length the issue of suspicious attachment of delegates to CLPs (constituency Labour parties) in the West Midlands borough of Sandwell – the heart of right-wing Labour, if it can be said to have a heart.

Delegates from affiliated organisations can exercise considerable control over the affairs, decisions and direction of a CLP, including the selection of its candidates in general elections – and Brandhall Labour Club (‘the club’) in the borough has been sending significant numbers of delegates to at least two local CLPs, including one whose MP is at odds with right-wing MPs in the area.

There are serious unanswered questions about those sent as delegates – at least some of whom have claimed they were delegated without their permission or even knowledge and that they are not members of the club.

The issues at Brandhall have prompted the executive of West Bromwich West CLP – seat of Adrian Bailey MP – to ask Labour’s new General Secretary Jennie Formby for an urgent investigation into the club, which is a limited company run by two current or former employees of Spellar, in an urgent email sent today.

The SKWAWKBOX has obtained a copy. It reads (emphases and links added by this blog):

The CLP has received delegates from the above company and has serious concerns that the Company is not a fully compliant organisation with The Labour Party and as such should not be able to nominate delegates to our CLP or any other.

We would suggest that to conduct and allow a thorough investigation into our complaints we would suggest [sic] that the Company’s delegates are suspended if not the Company pending the investigation results. 

We list below some of our concerns:

Firstly it is clear that the Company are purporting to be fully affiliated to the Labour Party with all of the rights that ensue, has this been confirmed?

Secondly a Company delegate put forward was asked about his nomination only to advise that he knows nothing about it and was not a member of Brandhall Labour Club anyway.

Thirdly at least one of the other delegates who was nominated by The Company is a Councillor and has not declared that she is a member of Brandhall Labour Party in the Councils declaration of interests, I would also suggest that there is no declaration to Sandwell Labour Group declarations also. This is the same delegate who also also falsely claimed to be a delegate from the Fabian Society who knew nothing about her. The previous CLP Treasurer is a close friend and Wednesbury North Branch Member where this conspiracy seems to have originated (see below in point five).

Fourthly it is quite possibly that the other nominated delegates are also not members of Brandhall Labour Club.

Fifthly it is with concern that the previous CLP Treasurer who would have dealt with the affiliation payment from Brandhall Labour Club and the Fabian Society is a close friend of the councillor and also the same branch (Wednesbury North Labour Party) which all but one of the delegates came from, it has been suggested that these branch members colluded with Brandhall Labour Club to send ineligible delegates to the CLP AGM and subsequent meeting.

If as been described that this Company has indeed been Complicit in sending
Illegitimate delegates then this is a very serious breach of Party Rules which was and has been used to try and influence party appointments locally and regionally, and is a serious affront to democracy within the Labour Party 

Please investigate as a matter of urgency as the West Bromwich West CLP AGM is only two weeks away.

Bob Lloyd Chair
Ian Jones vice Chair 
Maria Crompton Vice Chair

Outrage and concerns about Brandhall – which typify those of Labour members about the behaviour of entrenched interests in the whole borough – grow apace.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

8 responses to “W Brom West CLP asks Formby for urgent investigation into suspect Brandhall affiliations

  1. Hmm. Brandhall Labour Party is a company limited by shares, like a profit-making commercial company, rather than a company limited by guarantee as normally used by membership organisations.

    The 35 shareholders are listed here, if you want to check names to see if they are “members” in the share-holding sense:

    https://tinyurl.com/ydefnqh7

  2. rwendland, link gets AccessDenied now. No result from Google for Brandhall Labour Party.
    Companies House has this for what it’s worth:

    Brandhall Labour Club Limited
    9 officers – 3 resigned, leaving:

    Carole Ann Silvester
    Percy Eamus
    Gary Farr
    Stanley William Field
    Jeffrey Thomas Hale
    Victor Paul Silvester

    • Sorry about the non-working url. Try (pdf):

      https://tinyurl.com/yb2u3hc8

      It’s the Companies House latest Confirmation statement (7 August 2017), which has a full list of 35 shareholders (“members”) on pages 3 to 5.

  3. House of cards ?
    The domino effect is now beginning and ends with the removal of Spellar and his empire .
    Well done SB for highlighting this and bringing it into the light of day. The antidote to this type of subtle corrupting of the Labour party rules is exposure for all to see and with that comes a level of confidence for others who have for too long kept shtum .
    Now with a new honest Gen Sec they can come forward to rectify this domination .
    This is the start of taking back control of our party from the neoliberals who infest it ,, democracy at work now at grass root level giving back the real Socialist Labour membership their voice.
    Next up Streeting/Phillips/Chukka/Leslie etc etc take your pick either they get on board and support the membership and leadership or they ship out , their choice and our action !

  4. Pingback: Extraordinary email: “We were delegated to Spellar’s CLP without our permission’ – now suspend it” | The SKWAWKBOX·

  5. Pingback: Extraordinary email: “We were delegated to Spellar’s CLP without our permission’ – now suspend it” | RedZine·

  6. Pingback: Spellar’s undeclared interest in company paid by taxpayer for his office rental | RedZine·

  7. Pingback: Spellar’s undeclared interest in company paid by taxpayer for his office rental | The SKWAWKBOX·

Leave a Reply