As we remember #Manchester victims, remember this. #security #cuts

may threat 3

As the nation remembers the victims of the Manchester bombing, with grief for those killed and admiration for those who have overcome terrible injuries, the Establishment is presenting that grief and inspiration without proper recognition of what went before.

In the aftermath of the bombing a year ago, as the UK prepared for a general election, the SKWAWKBOX was attacked by right-wing media for pointing out the Tories’ culpability in the UK’s vulnerability to attack. Supposedly this was ‘politicising’ a tragedy.

This blog makes no apologies for raising that same culpability now, a year later.

Because it is political. The deaths of innocents at the hands of terrorists is a political matter when the Theresa May, as Home Secretary and Prime Minister, has presided over and driven massive cuts to policing.

Just as the tragic deaths at Grenfell Tower less than a month later were a political matter against a backdrop of Tory cuts and complicity with shoddy building regulations and inspection.

may rudd extrem.png

The deaths and injuries at the Manchester Arena are a political matter when May and her then Home Secretary Amber Rudd stripped the budgets of anti-extremism units to funnel more cash into Brexit campaigning.

The tragic impact of the Manchester bombing is even more political when, weeks after the event, May and Rudd were planning further huge cuts to counter-terrorism budgets:

may rudd cuts.png

Those events are even more intensely political in the light of the admission that the British government and security services had worked with and supported the militant anti-Gaddafi group that the bomber and his father fought for in Libya – in spite of a government response in the Commons that refused to say explicitly that Salman Abedi was a member of the group, but which implied that he did and that Abedi was linked to British intelligence.

They are hugely political in view of the revelation that, while May and Rudd refused to properly fund our national security, they were more than willing to use national security as an excuse not to release information about paedophiles who threaten the safety of our children:

may rudd abuse.png

The bombing is toweringly political when Theresa May as Home Secretary was filled with so much hubris that she told cameras that she could continue cutting police numbers without an adverse effect on our security:

And even more so when her successor was prepared, almost a year later, to lie to us all that police cuts were not at the root of huge increases in violent crime – even though her own department had told her differently:

rudd crime lie.png

The Manchester Arena tragedy is inescapably political when government politicians and allies who praised the incredible bravery of police, NHS and emergency services who risked their own lives and performed wonders for the injured or gave comfort to the dying will praise them again today – yet those very same politicians have inflicted cuts, created a crisis and destroyed the morale of the same people they conveniently praise.

Anyone raising these facts is a likely target for those accusations of ‘politicising’ a terrible tragedy.

But those who do not raise them dishonour the memory of those killed and their still-grieving families, the bravery of those who have overcome life-changing injuries – and the future generations who will live or die with the consequences of government action and inaction now.

Remember the victims. Do not forget the guilt of the guilty.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. If a government knows that cuts are directly leading to deaths, and do nothing about it – but in fact exacerbate things by making further cuts, then they are as guilty of wholesale murder as the nazis were.

    But they’ll just dismiss me as a ‘Godwinner’ for saying that, in a risible attempt to exculpate themselves.

    I sincerely hope the vast majority of them die screaming.

  2. John Pilger published this 31/05/2017.

    The alleged suicide bomber, Salman Abedi, was part of an extremist group, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, that thrived in Manchester and was cultivated and used by MI5 for more than 20 years.

    The “smoking gun” is that when Theresa May was Home Secretary, LIFG jihadists were allowed to travel unhindered across Europe and encouraged to engage in “battle”: first to remove Mu’ammar Gaddafi in Libya, then to join al-Qaida affiliated groups in Syria.

    Last year, the FBI reportedly placed Abedi on a “terrorist watch list” and warned MI5 that his group was looking for a “political target” in Britain.

    Not one of them can say they didn’t agree with their stringent cutbacks across the board they are all tarred with the same “RIGHT-WING BRUSH”!
    When it comes to judgement day, “GOD WON’T HELP THEM”!
    “IF ONLY, HEY”?

  4. The primary duty of the government is to protect the public.

    The Conservative Party has failed in that duty.

    1. “The Conservative Party has failed…”

      This is self evidently the theme that defines May’s government

  5. The Tory party has consistently made decisions and imposed policy that has led directly to the death of citizens that it is supposed to protect.
    Draw your own conclusions.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: