Analysis Breaking

Met Police bans JEWISH anti-genocide protesters from vast area of London

After weeks of police violence and trying to drum up opposition from residents, Met turns huge area of N London into no-go area for Jewish humanitarians

The Met Police, after weeks of violent arrests of peaceful Jewish anti-genocide protesters and trying to whip up opposition from local residents to justify its repression and draconian policing, has issued a blanket ban across a huge area of north London barring Jewish protesters from demonstrating anywhere the residence of Israel’s extremist ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely.

The area extends far beyond the boundaries of Swiss Cottage, from Regent’s Park and Marylebone in the south to Hampstead Heath and Cricklewood to the north:

The actual boundaries of Swiss Cottage.

In a social media statement, the Met claims that the ban on the weekly protest organiser by the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN) is to prevent ‘further serious disruption to the life of the community’, but the weekly Friday night protests have been concentrated in a small area by Hotovely’s residence and links the entirely peaceful, Jewish-led protests to ‘hate speech’ and ‘antisemitic hate crime’:

The force also claims to have seen ‘instances of hate speech and intimidating behaviour’ – but no participant in the anti-genocide protest has been convicted of any such crime, while pro-Israel protesters, by contrast, have been aggressive and abusive. Nor were there significant complaints about the protest from residents, leading to the police leafleting the area in an attempt to manufacture opposition:

A spokesperson for the group told Skwawkbox:

This is the seventh time we have been banned from one place or another. The police are acting on behalf of the Board of Deputies and the Israeli ambassador. We are outraged by the starvation of children and families. We are now picketing parliament daily.

Since October 2023 Israel has killed more than 200,000 Palestinians, overwhelmingly civilians and mostly women and children. It also used terrorist tactics to kill and maim thousands in Lebanon, including children and continues to bomb civilians and target journalists in both Gaza and Lebanon and has imposed a starvation blockade on Gaza’s almost two million surviving people that has pushed almost 300,000 children to the brink of death from malnutrition.

The Starmer government, which has refused to condemn Israel’s actions and continues to provide it with both weapons and direct military assistance, has said it considers the use of the word ‘genocide’ unhelpful and Starmer himself said last week that he has never called Israel’s campaign a genocide. The International Court of Justice is investigating Israel for genocide, the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli PM Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, and UN experts have confirmed that Israel is committing exactly that, along with a string of other war crimes.

Starmer and his agents is also misusing both the Public Order Act and the Terrorism Act to criminalise peaceful protesters and those who report on or oppose the genocide and occupation, many of them Jewish, to protect Israel from protest and the exposure of its war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Met has also charged peaceful marchers under the legislation, claiming they ‘forced’ their way through police lines when abundant video evidence shows police officers telling the marchers to cross.

Jewish Voice for Labour, whose members also participate in the peaceful Swiss Cottage protests, said of the ban:

This is a vast exclusion zone and represents a major escalation in the drive to criminalise all dissent.

If they manage to enforce this on protests against genocide they will surely extend it to silencing opposition to many other outrages

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.

11 comments

  1. Not exactly appertaining to your piece but I have just read this from Labour List:

    https://labourlist.org/2025/05/battle-for-barking-margaret-hodge-nick-griffin-2010-anniversary-bnp-election/

    Nowhere in there is there a mention of Hodges appreciation at the time of
    Jeremy Coybyn’s help and support against the far right ..when he drummed up
    a group from his own Constituency.

    I have her exact words – somewhere – which I will try to dredge up for a
    quote in my next post

      1. You HATE to agree with her (hodge)??

        Why’s that then?

        Can’t be because the vermin hates corbyn.

        Can’t be because it not only enabled padeophiles, but dismissed the victim(s).

        Or the near ushering in of the BNP.

        And it can’t be because of fhe hypocrisy of its own tax avoidance, can it?

        Not an exhaustive list, but if you feel there’s something I haven’t mentioned then don’t hesitate to tell us, will ya?

      2. You ‘have no real knowledge’ of hodge’s disgraceful attitude when dismissing and libelling victims of child sexual abuse when leader of Islington council?

        Despite it being mentioned at the time (and since) in the msm, and on here by myself and others on multiple occasions?

        It’s COMMON KNOWLEDGE for total fucks sake.

        But you ‘have no real knowledge’

        Once again you’re denying smarmerite/bliarite instances of paedophilia enablement.

        You’re a liar. And an apologist for pederasts.

        No need to ask why.

        And its noted you didn’t have much to say about keef or fatberg’s concocted examples corbyn antisemitism, neither.

  2. I recollect seeing the Met’s ‘request for information’, aka canvassing for complaints to clamp down on dissent, some considerable time ago and thought it wasn’t going to end well.

    The Met suggesting the protests are ‘taken elsewhere’. Will they then take similar action at that location? Ad infinitum until the blanket ban covers ever larger tracts?

    It must be a great time for real lawbreakers, so much time and energy spent by the Met – no doubt at the behest of that great ‘human rights lawyer’ Starmer – on clamping down on protest.

  3. Protect the war criminals is the top priority of the Met. All other policing comes a distant second.

    1. Making those police involved culpable in aiding and abetting those who are aiding and abetting war crimes.

      Collar Numbers and names should be recorded for future reference at a time when due process is re-established.

Leave a Reply to johnfrancispaulCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading