Analysis

UN tells Starmer: scrap 2-child benefit cap and increase benefits

UN says UK is discriminating against children, women, disabled and sick people, refugees, minorities and more

The United Nations have called on UK PM Keir Starmer to scrap the pointless and cruel two-child benefit cap that the Tories brought in and which Starmer has refused to end – even though keeping the cap costs the UK around £38bn more a year than scrapping it – and have told him that he is continuing the Tories’ blatant breaches of human rights for which the UK has been repeatedly criticised by UN experts.

The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) has published its “Seventh periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland” which, among a very long list of failures and negligence, criticises the UK’s failure to properly enshrine human rights in UK law and dismisses the government’s excuses for not doing so, saying that many of them are obsolete and all should be abandoned.

The report also criticises the UK for failing even to properly measure the harm caused by austerity – the Starmer regime is in fact fighting in court to try to hide those harms – and for being discriminatory in its policies and for using anti-refugee and anti-minority rhetoric to justify its actions that harm minorities and refugees disproportionately.

Among its lengthy list of recommendations – in reality demands, if the UK wants to be a civilised and law-abiding state on human rights – are:

  • end the two-child benefit cap
  • undo the grotesque under-provision of social security benefits by immediately and unconditionally increasing budgets, and ensure they are relentlessly index-linked against inflation
  • end all its policies inflicting poverty on children, disabled and sick people, ethnic and other minorities, single-parent families and others
  • institute a right to food to ensure everyone is properly fed and has legal recourse if they are not
  • end the price-gouging by water and energy companies to ensure realistic living costs
  • rebuild the NHS to an adequate level far above what the Tories and now their red successors have inflicted – because “the highest attainable standard of health” is a right
  • engage in – and fund – a mass social and affordable home-building programme

The two-child benefit cap, which was introduced by the Tories and which Starmer is determined to keep, hits around 1.6 million UK children in 440,000 families. Removing it would ‘cost’ around £1.6bn while saving £40bn – and would immediately lift around 300,000 children out of poverty while reducing poverty for well over double that number. Current policies are dragging more than a hundred children into poverty every single day.

One CESCR committee member said – and entirely accurately given Starmer’s and DWP Secretary Liz Kendall’s horrific language aimed at sick and disabled people – that:

I am under the impression that the [UK] continues to treat social security just as an instrument for getting people to work. I hope I am wrong. I am concerned that if this approach persists, I am afraid it is highly likely that the state party will continue to fail to address poverty.

The United Nations has for years condemned the UK government’s inhumane and deliberately cruel policies toward poor and disabled people, toward children and toward women as a gross breach of the UK’s international human rights obligations. UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty Philip Alston dismissed government excuses that there is no alternative to austerity, saying that the UK could fix the illegal hardships it has created ‘overnight’ if it wished to.

UK austerity policies have killed more than 300,000 people over the past decade or so. Around half of disability benefit claimants have attempted suicide because of the cruelty of government policy toward them.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.

9 comments

  1. Coming highlights;

    5bn to be cut from disability benefits overall

    Universal credit to be cut but ONLY for disabled people – penalising the most vulnerable

    Personal Independence Payment (PIP) rates to be frozen

    Meanwhile, Sir Lindsay Hoyle has gone through £250k on travelling expenses since becoming speaker. That’s over £1K per week…

  2. The UN are hamas. It’s true. Benny told keef as much.

    As for media whore hoyle…does whatever keef says to cling on to those perks; and that’s his reward.

    £250k on travel in five years? Now, where have I heard similar before….oh, yeah, that’s right…

    https://order-order.com/2023/04/13/first-class-hypocrite-starmer-spaffed-250000-on-luxury-flights-and-chauffeur/

    (WGAF that i posted a link to fawkes’ shite? I dont, but what the hey)

    We can only hope hoyle goes on one of these tv chat shows and is fronted/ambushed with the examples of his shithousery, the stupid-accented slimeball.

  3. Meanwhile, I see mcfadden – wrong ‘un written all over him – has had an idea…

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9q4nr42z20o

    Under-performing civil servants could be incentivised to leave jobs

    Yes. And it should include MPs, first and foremost. With the ‘incentive’ of being sent to dignitas, rather than being rewarded with an obscene pension and another cushy number elsewhere.

  4. He’s allowing a aktion t4 of which you’d of thought was history yet here it is culling the stock through benefits denial while those in the house of ill repute are themselves on tax payers benefits

  5. The truth is that along with the USA, and Russia, our economy is being run by the rich, for the rich. Note the withdrawal of the limit on bankers earnings (underwritten by the poor), the paucity of the school curriculum, and how the mass of the population is required to subsidise the former nationalised industries even whilst their performance is abysmal. Maybe that what happens when you have a Tri-lateralist and Davos-fanboy in charge.

  6. Human rights NOT enshrined in UK law and a devious Prime Minister mounting hostile attacks on democracy, (un-enshrined) human rights and Palestine, no-wonder Operation Replace Starmer is coming.

    1. “OPERATION Replace Starmer began bubbling up this January. It’s not an operation from the left — expulsions, suspensions and fixed MP selections mean the left doesn’t have the strength to undermine the PM. But careerist MPs, looking at Labour freefalling in the polls down to 25 per cent, behind Reform, worry they will lose their jobs….”

      https://www.pressreader.com/uk/morning-star/20250307/281702620473512

      1. I agree qwertboi, but question the polls giving the Starmer-Party 25%. Before the last election he had a steady 40%, and achieved half of that. Only won due to the Tories racing the Titanic to the bottom. I reckon he’ll be lucky to get 12% of the electorate. I suppose if all the other parties tank, then even that might be enough for a small majority in our corrupt system!

      2. MMmm, winteringham, great reasoning – but a 12% vote could put Schmarmers Labour into 3rd position if the tory voters that stayed at home in ’24 become Reform converts and vote at the next GE.
        Thing is, if Solomon Hughes ORS (operation replace starmer) theory is right, Streeting, Rayner or Phillipson (who’s she?) as new ‘leader’ ain’t going to be able to save labour.
        Where’s that ‘new party’ when you need it?

Leave a Reply to The ToffeeCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading