Analysis

Starmer’s 50% hike in bus fares is part of his all-out war on those with least

£723 onto typical household bills – not counting increased tuition fees, hundreds in winter fuel allowance cut on pensioners and more

Keir Starmer has today announced a fifty percent hike in the price of bus fares from £2 to £3 per journey, heaping an average extra cost of £480 in the cost of travel to work for millions of ordinary people who rely on buses, as well as even more costs on the back of millions who use them outside work commutes.

This rise is added to the £149 increase in energy bills on Starmer’s watch, a £94 increase in water bills (and possibly more) – a total extra hit of £723 on many of our poorest people – in addition to the £1,250 increase to tuition fees Starmer has announced, which will hammer families with children going to university or massively increase student debt, as well as putting off thousands of poorer students from going to university at all.

On top of all this, Starmer and his sidekick Rachel Reeves have cut the winter fuel allowance for ten million pensioners, which they know will kill thousands each year, announced they are keeping the two-child benefit cap that pushes 1.5 million children into poverty or deeper into it – and which costs more to keep than to abolish and are planning to force dangerous drugs onto the poor and to withhold benefits and NHS treatment from those who refuse.

And, through Liz Kendall’s DWP, they have launched an assault on the sick and disabled that will push half a million of them into poverty – and are planning to make banks snoop on their (and everyone’s) accounts for the government.

Technically, today’s announcement is in the cap on fares, but bus companies will of course charge the maximum they can, just as increases in tuition fee caps have always meant tuition fees immediately rise to that amount across the board.

Starmer and his factional allies, flush with cash from billionaires and corporations, are waging all-out war on those with the least.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

10 comments

  1. This lot are clueless. Having got drunk on the neoliberal Koolade, they are now trying to outdo themselves in the unpopularity stakes. This move is truly witless, and thoroughly anti – worker as well.

  2. Oh “we are not going to hammer working people”. So who uses buses then? Merchant bankers? No its the working folk mainly. Maybe this iteration of New Labour believe the Maggie Thatcher quote” if a man is still getting the bus to work when he is 30 he should be considered a failure.”

  3. BBC ‘journo’ described it as a ‘one third hike.’ Stumbled before he even got to the pretend journalism part.

  4. What? Not even a half hearted hurrah from the useless idiot cheerleader who touted Starmer and what he stands for as the only realistic and credible policies?

    Perhaps he’s crawled back under his stone?

      1. So far up keef’s ‘arris that when keef yawns, you’ll swear keefs gone all Freddie Starr and ate a hamster.

  5. Estimated saving to the Treasury: £350 million per year (Daily Mirror)

    Subsidy to the UK arms industry for the war in Ukraine alone: £3 billion a year.

  6. This was a discussion topic on the bbc news website yesterday.

    FIVE TIMES I posted about keefs charging the taxpayer £2000 per WEEK for a chauffeur driven car while he was DPP (Used to prosecute terrorists y’know…but NOT nonces, killer cops, occasionally bankers)

    And FIVE TIMES they removed the comment without publishing it (They ALL went into pre-moderation)

    That’d be the equivalent of funding1000 return journeys for PRODUCTIVE workers, per week.

    The useless, entitled, parasitical fucking slimeball that he is.

    (And no – I didn’t type that last sentence on the beeb)

  7. Don’t know where the ‘occasionally’ came from in my last post. Was meant to read ‘or casino bankers’

Leave a Reply to exiledinardmhacaCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading