Analysis

Labour’s assault on sick and disabled will push almost half a million into poverty

Cut that will do almost nothing to fill Reeves’s imaginary ‘black hole’ will have massive impact on disabled, ill and vulnerable

A DWP whistleblower has confirmed that Labour’s assault on the sick and disabled will push them into poverty. The former benefits assessor has told the i (paywall) that the government’s move to make sickness and disability benefits harder to obtain will cost well over 400,000 people just under £400 a month and force many who have been certified as unfit to work into the punitive ‘prepare for work’ category.

Liz Kendall’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) expects the plan, a continuation of the changes planned by the last Tory government, to cut around £750m a year from the benefits bill – a drop in a bucket compared to the made-up ‘£22bn black hole’ invented by Labour to justify its cuts and assaults on poor children, pensioners and the disabled and long-term sick.

Keir Starmer has said his government wants to make sickness benefits harder to access. Labour is also said to be planning to replace the monthly PIP (personal independence payments), paid to disabled people to compensate for the huge extra costs of living with a disability, with a one-time ‘grant’.

The whistleblower, a trained nurse who worked for years assessing disabled people, told the i:

You would hope the assessment process could be changed to make it a fairer system, more humane. But this is about trying to cut the benefits bill, which is frightening. There needs to be more support for disabled people, not less.

People need regular payments. Cutting PIP payments would leave a lot of people struggling badly. It will force people into poverty.

Disabled people’s groups condemned the plan as ‘devastating’ and ‘farcical’. Mikey Erhardt, of Disability Rights UK, told the paper:

It sounds like the drive is getting people into work and scaling back what people receive. They seem content to lump getting people into work and personal support together.

As long ago as 2018, the Tory DWP was revealed to be aware that the number of disability benefits claimants attempting suicide had doubled by 2014, compared to 2007, after the introduction of the cruel and punitive Work Capability Assessment – which Labour now wants to toughen – and was a horrific 43%, a number likely only to have climbed in the decade since of Tory (and now red-Tory) persecution of disabled and sick people, and of corporate price-gouging masquerading as a ‘cost of living crisis’.

So horrific was this deliberate harrying and deprivation of the poor, disabled and vulnerable that UN Special Rapporteur for Extreme Poverty and Human Rights Philip Alston concluded, after a tour of the UK, that the system was intentionally designed create stress, distress and hardship (video) – and to tell them that ‘you’re on your own’.

More than a year ago, Skwawkbox revealed exclusively that Labour had undertaken no impact assessments at all of the effects of their policies and planned cuts on vulnerable people.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

13 comments

  1. If there’s any such thing as divine justice, let it manifest itself as severe physical/mental debilitation upon smarmer/thieves/screeching/kendall,and anyone else who supports their shithousery.

    🤞🙄🫰

    1. Amen to that, Toffee.

      And we still have another week before the main event.

  2. The absence of Impact Assessment by Labour, both as Opposition, and now, regrettably, as HMG tells us everything we need to know about Starmer&Co (‘by appointment to the Court of Israel’)

    People and their well-being don’t matter.

    Community support capabilities and facilities of the effected people don’t matter much either (“Every man for himself”)

    Environmental factors like are there enough foodbanks, shelters, medical facilities for the effected people are hardly important, etc., etc., etc..

    BUT MOSTLY, it tells us the Starmer&Co do not even adhere to the agreed evidence-centred policy-making practices used by OECD/EU/FiveEyes countries (“the free world”)

    Starmer&Co, not even good at being not good – unless it’s to help Israel.

    1. We should all demand publication of these reports. We need to stand in solidarity with all vulnerable people. We need to ask how we can support people and listen to what they say in that respect, ie what they may find helpful..

  3. No impact assessment means the Disability Charities will wipe the floor with them in court
    As qwertboi points out Red Tories are even shit at being cheap and nasty Shits
    They have already lost the next GE
    In the meantime they will sell out to every vested interest on both sides of the Atlantic, mucho dinero for the spivs and thieves

      1. “They have already lost the next GE…..”

        The assumption that the situation will be such that another General Election will take place is not necessarily one which I would put money on.

      2. Kid starver, Freeze reeves and co will do all they can to milk it whilst they can. I guess they will do all they can to stay in power for as long as is possible.

      3. Her willing to be listening or actually listening seems to me to be an impossible feat. She likes to be in power so it seems.

  4. The Disability Charities need to force the f7ckers to release both reports on how many people they drive to their deaths which is integral to any jmpact assessment

    1. I wouldn’t expect too much there, Doug. Don’t forget the CAA (Campaign Against Anti-Semitism of ‘weaponising antisemitism fame, thanks Asa Winstanley) is a Charity (Charity number: 1163790) and not even the Charity Commission itself could/would do much about reining-in its overtly political anti-corbynism.

      People like Starmer don’t let little things like ethics constrain their actions.

      1. “People like Starmer don’t let little things like ethics constrain their actions.”

        ….. Or traditional processes.

Leave a Reply to Dave HansellCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading