Analysis Breaking

Starmer’s pick Evans to stand down as Labour general secretary

Anonyvoter concerns, massive data breach and Evans’s part in cover-up of ‘sadistic and criminal’ abuse of Muslim women not expected to be an obstacle to peerage

Keir Starmer’s hand-picked Labour general secretary David Evans, who infamously said that “representative democracy should as far as possible be abolished in the Party”, is to step down at Labour’s annual conference this month. Evans was previously a Blair aide and owner of a Croydon campaign company paid by Labour, under Evans, for producing reports – Evans gave his share of the business to his wife Aline Delawa to ‘avoid a conflict of interest’. Before taking a controlling share in the campaign firm, Delawa was secretary of the business and also a staffer running party selections – while The Campaign Company was promoting candidates in those selections.

As general secretary Evans oversaw a massive data breach in which members’ data was lost to a criminal ‘ransomware’ attack on the company to whom he had outsourced member management. His associates’ ‘Anonyvoter’ system, used by the party under Evans’s tenure, is considered by many to have been manipulated to rig candidate selections and other party votes. The party awarded the contract to Anonyvoter without a competitive bidding process. Then-deputy leader of Croydon Council, Alison Butler, has a child with Evans. Croydon Council awarded contracts worth almost £200,000 to Evans’s company over a four-year period. None of these concerns impeded Starmer’s determination to impose Evans as general secretary.

Most notoriously – or it would be, if it hadn’t been ignored by the so-called ‘mainstream’ media – Evans and his boss covered up the ‘criminal’ and ‘sadistic’ exploitation and sexual abuse of Muslim victims of domestic violence, by the staffer and alleged lover of a right-wing member of Starmer’s front bench, Khalid Mahmood. The pair repeatedly ignored a whistleblower’s attempts to get them to take action to protect the women. Mahmood, who sacked whistleblower Elaina Cohen, did not challenge the evidence of one of the many victims when she testified at the ensuing and successful employment tribunal for wrongful dismissal.

None of this is expected by insiders to be any obstacle to Evans being appointed by Starmer to the House of Lords, just as happened with the previous and equally controversial right-wing general secretary, Iain McNicol.

Evans’s departure raises no hopes of better to come. In Labour’s diseased and rigged machine under Keir Starmer that punishes dissent even when it is for the sake of hungry children, it would be foolish to expect his successor will differ in any meaningfully positive respect.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

15 comments

  1. The Labour Party – well and truly captured by a criminal conspiracy! Prove me wrong!

    1. There are plenty of Tories who lost there seats, a perfect fit for Starvers Fascist party general sec.

    2. Doesn’t the party leader appoint a GenSec, SteveH?

      Because of the Labour party’s legal status, an ‘unincorporated association’, the GenSec represents the party in any legal matters or actions. That’ll be the reason for Evans’ departure I bet.

    3. Who do YOU think, wee steven?

      Given that keef has further demonstrated that he has a propensity for leniency towards sex offenders….

      https://www.channel4.com/news/exclusive-some-sex-offenders-to-get-early-release-from-prison-under-government-plans-warn-whistleblowers

      (And these are the ones that actually went to jail… thousands – if not tens of thousands – haven’t, due to keef writing the sentencing guidelines, dont forget)

      …Could it be that keef might ask gary glitter if he wants to be in keef’s gang, keef’s gang, keef’s gang.

    1. Unfortunately, my y mp is angela illeagle, Tony.

      Skin from a stick, blood from a stone. Illeagle’s neither use nor ornament.

      Will happily go on jollies to Switzerland, paid for by lobbyists for disability deniers, though; ironically to WHO meeting(s)..Just a shame it werent a one-way ticket to dignitas 😕

      1. Commiserations.

        Try again later, perhaps, when some more signatures have been obtained and it will be more difficult for her to refuse.

  2. The removal of David Evans as Labour Party General Secretary can be likened to pouring a bucket of sick down the sink..
    He is most aptly qualified to be appointed to the House of Lords.

  3. Why does keef look like he’s suppressing a fart, and fat dave look like he’s followed through?

    Anyways, good bleedin’ riddance. And take that fraudulent annoythevoter with ya, ya fat meff.

    And now for someone completely the same (or worse). Fat lukey strangler??

  4. Exclusive: Some sex offenders to get early release from prison under government plans warn whistleblowers
    Some serious sexual offenders and other violent criminals will be released under Labour’s prisoner early release scheme despite government assurances that serious crimes would be excluded from the policy, Channel 4 News understands.

    dangerous criminals and protect the public.”

    “The new Lord Chancellor announced in July that she was scrapping the previous Government’s early release scheme, replacing it with a system which gives probation staff more time to prepare for a prisoner’s release. The Government has also set out plans to recruit over 1,000 new trainee probation officers by March 2025 to meet additional demand.”

    More examples of genius from the GOBSHITE who said he was gonna protect women & children…and who almost immediately releases an influx of nonces into society.

    And they made THAT poster about sunak…

  5. Perhaps the war criminal behind this report might want the job?

    https://www.politico.eu/article/tony-blair-nhs-chatbots-uk-gp-healthcare/

    “Tony Blair proposes closing most local GP surgeries and replacing them with super primary care centers, a leaked report shows….

    …The report advocates creating a centralized store of digitized health records that could be used to power “AI doctors” that would interact with citizens through a chatbot……

    …..“On substance, Blair wants Labour to close your GP and have you talk to a chatbot instead,” said Sam Smith at Medconfidential, an organization that campaigns on issues related to health data.

    “’Far fewer groups of primary-care practices’ likely needing to be run by larger healthcare corporations … will translate into fewer GPs,” said Diarmaid McDonald, director of Just Treatment, an organization that campaigns against NHS privatization.

    “Rather than seeking to cut costs using wholly unproven and overhyped AI tools that seem designed to further open up the NHS to large corporate profiteers, patients want to see the investment in the health service that would mean they can see a GP — a human that knows them, and has time to listen, when they need help.””

    ———————————————————-

    Just think of the “efficiency savings” the LP could mnake by transposing this model onto the administration of the Party. It could dispose of all those messy meetings of Party Units at Ward and CLP levels. Replacing them with a ‘chatbot’. Which would have the added advantage for the PMC class running this shit show of never having to mix with the riff-raff of the Party membership ever again.

    Conference could be replaced an AI system making policy based on the atomised input of the handful of Party members remaining. Based of course on some kind of backdoor weighted seeding process by which some members are more equal than others in such a process.

    Having already trialled the abaence of due process within the Party and extended that trial into the ‘justice system’ such an approach could similarly be extended to local and national elections. Doing away with all that messy canvassing and campaigning and the indignity of the really important people having to meet the deplorables and ‘useless eaters’ on the doorstep.

    The only question remaining is: Would anyone actually notice the difference?

Leave a Reply to alexanderscottishCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading