Pro-Palestine equality activist aims to unseat Jess Phillips in Birmingham Yardley. The task just got simpler
All independent candidates in the Birmingham Yardley constituency have agreed to step down to allow WPGB candidate Jody McIntyre a clear run in his bid to oust Labour right-winger Jess Phillips in the general election. McIntyre, a pro-Palestine and equality activist who became a Muslim, announced the news on his social media, saying:
All other independent candidates have agreed to stand down in Birmingham Yardley for the sake of a united campaign to unseat Labour Friend of Israel Jess Phillips. Our chances of causing the political shock of the century have just received a huge boost, but we need more volunteers if we want to win. Contact jodyforyardley@gmail.com and join us on the streets. This is the opportunity of a lifetime.
Phillips has recently been more vocal about Palestine and has denied being a ‘member’ of Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). But as she has admitted, LFI does not have parliamentary members, but rather ‘supporters’. Phillips claims she was listed as a supporter ‘on a Wikipedia list from 2022’ because she “supported their calls for 2 state solution in 2016”. LFI took down its published list of supporters
However, numerous articles – including from the strongly pro-Israel Jewish Chronicle – have named her as a supporter of the group, a fact that will not help her campaign in a seat with a large Muslim population and many others outraged by Israel’s genocide in Gaza:
Phillips voted, against Keir Starmer’s orders, for a ceasefire last November in what many saw as a move to try to protect herself from local Muslim anger. However, her issues with the Muslim community are not limited to Palestine. She has been heavily criticised for accusing Muslim families of ‘importing’ wives from Pakistan for their ‘disabled sons’.
McIntyre, who became well-known after police dragged him away in his wheelchair during a Palestine protest, is one of a group of candidates supported by the ‘Ordinary Left’ grassroots group and others. His formal campaign launch takes place on Saturday but he and his supporters have already been hitting the streets hard.
SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount). Thanks for your solidarity so SKWAWKBOX can keep doing its job.
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.
Good to see a front uniting in Birmingham to rid the city of this odious, double-dealing, back-stabbing, self-absorbed aunt (typo), who has a lonnnng-overdue appointment at the Jobcentre!
wonderful ! Wonderful !!
WONDERFUL !!! +*x+*x+*x
Been feeling great all day, and now this FABULOUS news is beautiful icing on a GLORIOUS cake !!!
ALL SUCCESS to WPGB !!! Wishing not only wins. Lets all “wake up everyday thinking of new ways to undermine” the parasitised Labour Party!!! May the parasites EVERYWHERE lose their deposits!!!
Onwards and upwards !!!
DOWN with
🪱🪳🐍🪰🪱🪳🐍🪰🪱🪳🐍🪰Sir Keith Starmer’s Tory B-side infestation🔴🔴🔴
(apologies to worm, cockroach, vipers & disease spreading flies appreciation societies.)
The very recent MRP polls strongly indicate that Labour will win Birmingham, Yardley with an overall majority.
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/calcwork23.py?postcode=B25+8LW
I wonder if Jody McIntyre will manage to hang onto his deposit. 🤔
“Jess Phillips (left in group photo) who has denied being a member of LFI but has been repeatedly listed as a supporter”
Be careful with the terminology.
The poisonous LFI may not be a “Membership Organisation”.
It may only have “Supporters”.
The difference is a slight-of-hand trick.
You may remember The Militant Tendency.
It also claimed not to have members, but its “Supporters” were supporters of the Militant Newspaper..
Again … A slight of hand interpretation.
Solidarity with Jody McIntyre !
“Hark! Hark!
The Dogs do bark;
The beggars are coming to Town;
Some in jags;
And some in rags;
And some in velvet gown.”
– Old English Rhyme
Thugs [thinking about the company such members of LFI keep in the context of the latest Skwawkbox article about certain racist groups running riot through Palestinian land] don’t just swan around in white – or any other colour – shirts.
They also wear collars and ties and give themselves airs and graces:
https://theintercept.com/2024/06/03/columbia-law-review-palestine-board-website/?
“Columbia Law Review Refused to Take Down Article on Palestine, So Its Board of Directors Nuked the Whole Website
The students who edit the journal sought out the article by a Palestinian scholar who was censored by Harvard Law Review last year.”
There is only one way to deal with them – regardless of whether they wear shirts or a collar and tie.
Jess Phillips is being mendacious here. She couldn´t wait to escort Ruth Smeeth to Labour HQ and take prominent position in a figurative “lynching mob” against Marc Wandsworth, an innocent black man.
This is the same woman reported to have said f.ck off to Diane Abbot.
Pictures speak louder than words and here is our Jess escorting Ruth Smeeth, taking proud position on the “lynching mob”
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/jewish-labour-mp-ruth-smeeth-runs-gauntlet-of-protest-vdm59clz3
Maybe Jody McIntyre can use the picture in his publicity to expose the cynical manipulation of Jess Phillips.
I was quite shocked to see many of those on the fairly long list of Labour ‘supporters’ of LFI (they must think, as my old Mum in Lancashire would have said ‘we fell off the flitting’ to believe that was any different to being a ‘member’) before it was taken down – including my own MP. Another on the very long list now of reasons why I shall not be voting Labour – for the first time in my fairly long life.
All the best to Jody McIntyre.
Good luck to Jody let’s hope Phillips get’s what she deserves some of us have not forgot how she threatened JC to be stabbed in the front and back let’s hope its her turn to lose her seat, All LFI who support the Genocidal baby killers should be ashamed of themselves
Being a supporter of LFI can have some lucrative rewards, for instance when Debbie McGee was asked “what was it about the millionaire Paul Daniels that first attracted you to him”.
Hopefully Yardley will get rid of the massive-gummed, mouthy, toff-befriending witch, who has a problem with bame women in positions equal to, or above her own.
Even more hopefully to Jody McIntyre 👍
And well in, the Spanish!! (Although the Catalans have been unfairly treated)
Ireland will hopefully throw their names on the list, too. The more the better, although none of our israeli-owned gobshites have got the cojones to do so. 😕
Toffe, the Catalans have not been unfairly treated. Junts just wanted a Referendum for independence to cover up their corruption while in charge of governing Catalunya.
They knew the Spanish Constitution of 1978, which their Party under another name at the time, enthusiastically voted for. The Constitution make explicitly and act of rebellion a vote for independence in any region of Spain without the Spanish Parliament voting 2/3 in favour. An impossible feast.
Junts is a neo-liberal outfit that ever so often change its name when its mired in corruption.
I have a great deal of respect from ERC but none for Junts. Please don´t make the mistake of comparing Junts with Sinn Fein.
Hers is one of 16 seats that Labour reportedly feels that it could lose at this election.
Here is the full list:
https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2024/06/04/labours-support-for-the-gaza-genocide-has-backfired-badly/
If your going to start something you might as well finish it, no good counting the combined votes of non Tories after the event
Reform works against both Tory parties leave them in
It’s worth it if the ultimate prize is either a minority Labour government and /or PR
Stop acting like @#$%^&* Civilians
I agree. Every vote against the status quo is one for us. Whoever believes that they will take or retake the red wall should rethink. Where did most of reform or anti EU votes come from and move to?
Meanwhile…….
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3ggr3pg4ljo
“Labour drops legal action against Corbyn-era staff”
“A former shadow cabinet member – who did not wish to identified – told the BBC the party should have dropped the legal action earlier.
He said: “This is a huge embarrassment for the party, which has wasted eye-watering sums which could have made the difference in key seats in this election.”
Martin Forde KC, the lawyer who carried out a wide-ranging report into the culture of the party, said: “It is a great shame that money has been spent on legal fees that could have been spent on the general election.”
Labour had said previously it had been confident of its case.
The most recent documents presented in open court last autumn showed that Labour had spent £1.5m on legal action, and estimated it would spend nearly £900,000 more.
The party’s final costs are likely to be higher, as these figures don’t reflect the full cost of the litigation.”
———————————————
The question arises: Why would anyone concerned about the economic well being of the Country hand control of the Country’s economic future to anyone so spendthrift with the money donated by their own members?
No surprise.
It was that, or bankruptcy. I’ll bet a certain someone’s chewing the furniture into splinters again.
As for Jody McIntyre…I KNEW I recognise the name. He’s the kid the plod dragged out of the wheelchair during the student misbehaviour many years ago; and was subsequently (pathetically and unsuccessfully ) browbeaten and made out to be a threat to the old bill by that bbc gobshite, ben brown, in perhaps THE most shocking interview I’ve ever seen.
(Although juligan hardly-brouhaha’s interview with the Palestinian MP the other week was another shitshow)
Anyway, go get ’em, Jody 👍
Re “Labour drops legal action against Corbyn-era staff”, Labour’s director for legal affairs Alex Barros-Curtis has been imposed as the party’s election candidate in the Cardiff West constituency despite being described as “unknown in Wales.”
First he costs the party upwards of £5m, then he gets parachuted into a seat he has no connection with. This is Starmer at his Best.
A senior Labour MP said: “The parachuting of Alex Barros-Curtis into a safe Labour seat is a disgrace now we know what he is responsible for.
“This Starmer-appointed official has spent millions of pounds of the Labour Party’s money dragging former party employees through the courts for four years, pursuing a pointless and failed political vendetta.
“[Barros-Curtis] has wasted eye-watering sums which could have made the difference in key seats in this election.
“But the Labour leadership has now rewarded him with a safe seat with which he has no connection.
“This is yet another case of faction first, before the interests of either the party or the country.”
NEC member Luke Akehurst [I love Israel] parachuted into North Durham and had a hot reception from protestors on arrival. In the past two days he has deleted 2,179 tweets, in one he encouraged and supported colonization and Palestinian land theft.
“I’m in favour of the major West Bank settlement blocks becoming part of Israel, and for the Golan Heights to remain part of Israel”.
Whereas Faiza Shaheen was deselected by Labour because after trawling through her last 10 years communications they found 2 anodyne tweets which they did not like, and out she goes.
Akehurst can trash International Law on the West Bank and Golan Heights and now he is flavour of the month with Starmer.
Does he like Israel more than nuclear weapons?
As for Faiza Shaheen, I believe that the complaint against her came form the JLM. And that the replacement candidate is a supporter of JLM!
Quite correct. I watched the Shaheen interview on news night, and that’s what she said. I mentioned it was a jlm complaint in another thread, but it’s NO surprise the candidacy’s gone to a jlm member.
She explained that it wasn’t even the (supposedly – I’ve not seen it meself) antisemitic tweet she liked, but the Jon Stewart sketch that had been retweeted.
Now, I turn the TV over when I see claudia winklemann, rachel riley, david baddiel and many more celebrities that happen to be jewish.
Does that make me antisemitic?
Does doing the same when graham norton (for example) when he’s on my screen make me anti-irish, or homophobic, or both?
To me it doesn’t, but tough shit if others think so.
Toffee – This is the ‘offending’ John Stewart sketch/tweet that Faiza Shaheen liked
Toffee – https://x.com/mehdirhasan/status/1795972940850167948
It is a strange relationship. By the way how can Labour lose so much money and remain unabashed. Its a hell of a lot of dosh.
This Pro-Israel Extremist Just Joined Labour
Another reason for not voting Labour.
I will add it to all the others. It appears that Labour will not repeal the Conservative vote-suppression laws brought in a couple of years ago.
He’s got bigger things to worry about Tony. Central Bank Digital Currency, Disease X (c*vid2) and WWIII don’t just happen, you know.
Labour-under-Starmer is becoming pure, unadulterated evil.
What is Jody McIntyre’s position on LGBT issues? Galloway said he did not want children to be taught “that gay relationships are exactly the same and as normal as a mum, a dad and kids…I don’t want my children to be taught that these things are equal because I don’t believe them to be equal”.
You playing an. identity politics game? Most LGBT people give thanks that they’re not ‘normal’. Worry about intentional (not ‘plausible’) Genocide instead.
I’m a gay man. Are you playing word games? Galloway said gay people aren’t equal to everyone else. His words were “I don’t believe them to be equal”.
Does Jody McIntyre believe that gay people are equal to everyone else? Does he support gay equality, same-sex marriage, and equal adoption rights? Or is he a homophobe?
And on that note, I had to chuckle earlier when I seen some mush wearing a t+shirt that read:
I’M FAT
But I identify as SKINNY
I’m
Trans slender
(I’ll get myself one, I think)
Me too, Andy but I didn’t hear anything more sinister or worrying from Father Galloway than I might hear – and have heard – from many Abrahamic theists. They never worried me before and they certainly don’t today.
To my mind, Galloway was foolish to cite his personal homophobic opinion as if it had biological or social significance.
More worryingly – for me – NM and its celebrity presenters convinced me that they are just little people of the most ‘idiotically useful’ type to the PtB and confirmed that they cannot see the wood for the forest. Even if I lived in Birmingham Yardley I wouldn’t refuse to vote for a candidate on a single stated policy which I agree with simply because their party’s leader is sometimes a bit of a pratt.
Don’t vote for him then.
It’s not a question of agreeing with a policy. It’s the politics of my nature, what I am. Galloway is not a bit of a prat, he’s the leader of the ‘Workers’ Party’ and has as you say homophobic opinions. The quotes (from the Independent) are in accord with the leaflets he put round Muslim areas in Rochdale. They make sense too with some of the stories which went round about his time at War on Want. Does Jody McIntyre agree with him? If so there’s no way any democratic socialist should vote for him.
Andy
Watch the interview again, he said no such thing
Your interpretation is way off
Why would anybody who professes to be on ‘the left’ vote for a populist like George Galloway 😕
GG was stitched up like a kipper by NM after that interview
Which reminded me that they and Owen Jones were a big part of the AS Scam against JC
That’s the problem when you let the bairns play at politics
Why would anybody who professes to be on ‘the left’ vote for a Zionist genocide apologist and globalist like Keir Starmer.
There. Fixed it for you Billy.
In my dictionary, a populist (noun) “is a person, especially a politician, who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups” – Eg: “he ran as a populist on an anti-corruption platform”. Who could possibly argue with that?
Isn’t it revealing that, since Blair’s time, possibly before, right-wingers like Billy have used this term as an insult!
Why, Billy, a seat in the House of Lords, of course!
Comment that should go here somehow ended up 2 comments above ⬆️⬆️
Billy, a seat in the House of Lords, of course!
Fuck me, this site’s gone haywire, putting replies to SteveH under the wrong SteveH comment. Never mind. The “Why, Billy, a seat in the House of Lords, of course!” reply was in answer to his comment at 8.04pm.
When I was 9 or so, it was common to hear older teens and young 20s to talk of queer bashing.
A lot has changed since then. But we’ve definitely reached the far end. People are looking into queer theory and the people who promote it. People like Foucault, godfather of QT (Paedo). Gayle Rubin, wrote the document of QT. Compared the desire to screw small boys with the desire for hot and spicy foods (WTF!?. And then there is Pat Califia. Yandex tells all…Then there’s the news articles such as Opinion:Why the Sex Offenders register destroys LGBT rights.
Be careful of the hill you choose to battle on.
Well put.
I see that Sharon Graham is grandstanding again. 🙄
“Unite union refuses to endorse Labour manifesto”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c722zkj9ly8o
One has to wonder what she is hoping to achieve?
To distance herself from the wretched Sir Keir and his authoritarian “show-me-your-papers”-ism?
He’s as good as PM already, so she can pretend again to be further left than Ld Starmer of Davos-to-be – just like most people (even 65yo+working people who think Nigel Farage is a “sound bloke”) actually are – and a worthy GS.
All part of the corruption, its performative to give the impression of independence, when a blind man with a shitty stick can see they all piss in the same pot
It appears that Andy Foster and the well-known troll, Steve H, are on the same side then.
Some on the left have a long standing beef with George Galloway, in that he didn’t join any of the many strands of Trotskyism when he left Labour.
I smell some good old-fashioned left sectarianism coming into play here …. Cultivated by the usual suspects …… in an attempt to smear and damage Galloway.
Galloway’s record as an outstanding supporter and advocate for Palestinian rights is impeccable.
Check out his Wikipedia entry.
Some on the left don’t understand that equality of WEALTH is socialism’s paramount priority. All the others are secondary (Morning Star, please note). Once we’ve got wealth equality sorted, then we’ll see what can be done for minorities.
I reckon we walk and chew gum at the same time – at least if we expect to be taken seriously on being consistent in the espoused principles and values.
Besides which, some objectives are going to take a lot longer than others. Attempting to establish wealth equality in various contexts has been going on for at least several hundred years if not more and we are still a long way from that objective.
Making everything else dependent upon achieving that objective first would have resulted in women still waiting to get the vote or access to safe abortion rights. Not to mention a whole bunch of other civil rights having to wait their turn.
I’m not convinced its quite as simple and straightforward as that.
Firstly, I’ll make explicit – again – the issue of my ‘skin in this game’ and get it out of the way.
A long time ago I was the subject of a complaint against me to a Union General Secretary by this current Member of Parliament on a matter where the context was that there was only one plausible way in which he could have obtained that information.
Without going into any detail, that specific avenue made this individual suspect in a ‘controlled opposition’ way.
Since then I’ve tended to separate out and divorce the content of any argument and analysis on any matter from this individual who has presented that argument and analysis. i.e. focused entirely on the merits or otherwise of the actual argument and analysis being presented on its own merits.
Whilst there are certainly arguments, analysis and even statements presented by this individual which have merit there are also issues and matters in which he fails the basic test of consistency.
One example being his stance against Scottish Independence which not only contradicts the principle he has stood on in regards to the independence of other peoples – the Palestinians for example – but also neatly dovetails into The Official Unionist Narrative of the British Nationalist State which much of his stance on many other issues claims to be in opposition to.
It seems reasonable to accept the same problematic consistency issue also exists in regards to any stance, statement or argument presented which – subject to verification – attempts to deny one set of human beings – in the case of the argument presented by Andy Foster members of the Gay Community – are not equal to everyone else.
Because fundamentally such a stance or argument is based on the same faulty logic used to treat, for example, Palestinian’s as second class human beings.
You are either consistent in terms of espoused principles and values across multiple issue or you aren’t. This individual current MP has certainly demonstrated a degree of credibility on specific matters which has had a degree of success in establishing his credentials as a self-styled figure of the political ‘left.’ However, his occasional very obvious lapses in consistency confirm the longstanding suspicions I have held since the time of that complaint submitted against me.
Dave – Are we to take it that you still bear a grudge?
ps, “You are either consistent in terms of espoused principles and values across multiple issue or you aren’t.”
Really?
How do you reconcile your self-professed ‘socialist principles’ with your support for the corrupt fascist Putin?
Nothing to do with grudges Billy and everything to do with standard risk assessment.
Working in the communications industry those of us in the Union at branch level went through some, lets go with, ‘interesting experiences’ and were well aware of what was going on. In one known instance without the Home Secretary’s authorisation.
Moving on. You keep repeating this misrepresentation yet despite numerous reasonable requests to do so cannot back that statement up with substantive evidence.
To reiterate:
https://skwawkbox.org/2024/05/15/video-journalists-flee-as-israeli-drone-bombs-them/#comment-255107
“You keep saying this Billy but what evidence do you have that any facts and evidence I have presented – much of it sourced from within the West and by Western politicians – is “propaganda”?
Where’s the beef? Present your case. Give us your evidence.
– The OSCE (Organisation for Security Cooperation in Europe) data on the shelling of the Russian speaking civilian population of the Donbass and subsequent numbers of civilian deaths is “Putin Propaganda”? And by definition the OSCE are “Putin Propagandists”?
Really?
– That Merkal and Hollande are “Putin Propagandist’s for publicly stating that they and the Collective West entered the Minsk Agreements in bad faith; had no intention of implementing those agreements; and the agreements were only entered into to prepare the Ukrainian military to enter into conflict with the Russian Federation by proxy on behalf of the US. And by definition their pubic statements to that effect are “Putin Propaganda”?
Seriously?
– The Myrotvorets site with the list of individuals it contains is a “Putin Propaganda” site. And the Ukrainian’s who administer it and the CIA who control it are “Putin Propagandists”?
Come again?
– That the public statement by the head of NATO Jan Stoltenburg that the conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 not 2024 is “Putin Propaganda”. And therefore the head of NATO is a “Putin Propagandist”?
Yeah! Right! Okay!
– That arguing for the consistent application of universal principles to apply evenly to everyone – including Russian speakers, Palestinians, and other Countries outside the Collective West – such as the right to security, the right to self defence and the right to ask for assistance under the UN R2P (Right to Protect) provisions is “Putin Propaganda.”
On what planet Billy?
If you had any evidence to support these unsubstantiated and childish smears and slanders you would have presented it by now.
Repeating complete unsubstantiated and un-evidenced bollocks over and over again is simply the meaningless drivel of the school playground or the football terraces.
What it is not is grown up adult discourse.
What is really, and tragically, funny, is you seriously expect any normal person reading your rantings is going to be convinced of anything you say when this is the level of argument you come up with.
What a sad, pathetic, caricature of a human being you are presenting to the world.”
———————————————–
But I’m obviously forgetting. In the alternative reality of The Official Narrative you are pushing, Billy, civilian workers and their families in the Donbass Oblasts of what was Ukraine have no rights to be part of the working class; or safety and security; or any civil rights by the fact that they vote the “wrong” way in elections; speak the “wrong” language; and object – clearly unreasonably in your warped view – to be abused and slaughtered by swastika tattooed knuckle dragger’s.
Just like the Palestinians and anyone else who gets in the way of the Imperialist Western minority elite you shill for.
And are therefore fair game for your neo-nazi chums in Kiev who worship the legacy of the Third Reich and receive unstinting support from useful idiots such as your self. Projecting that onto others via your repeated misrepresentations fools no one here but yourself Billy.
Dave – Was their complaint against you upheld?
His, not their, complaint.
Lets just say that for a number of reasons it had no legs. Not just de jure but also de facto (as Holmes would have observed: the dog did not bark). It went nowhere.
An opportunity was presented to have a pop at a political opponent of that time which was clearly too good to pass over. However, because of the context giving in to that urge raised some interesting questions to anyone paying attention to the facts and sequence of events. Not just of what did occur but also of what did not occur.
Dave – So was his complaint against you upheld or not.
A straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ will suffice.
Toffee – Do you mean the time-line that exposes your mendacious lies for what they are?
What would be the purpose of having a discussion more than a year after the event and bearing in mind that the facts about who knew what and when were already well known along with the actions that various parties tool when they were informed what would it have achieved?
What mitigation would that be, all I’ve done is present the facts, it is not my problem if they expose you assertions for what they are.
What would be achieved by anyone following your example
Again, what mitigation would that be
It won’t have escaped anyone’s attention that for some reason you have a compulsion to run around shouting ‘nonce’ along with an accompanying range of expletives. We can only guess why. 😕
Which bit of ‘it had no legs….it went nowhere” are you having a problem comprehending Billy?
And why would anyone with more than one brain cell to rub together (ie a reductionist) focus on that single aspect rather than the more pertinent context?
Dave – “Which bit of ‘it had no legs….it went nowhere” are you having a problem comprehending Billy?”
The bit where you failed to answer my straightforward question with a straightforward ‘yes’ or ‘no’.
I’m guessing that there must be a reason why you are so reluctant to answer a simple straightforward question about whether the complaint you were telling us about that was made against you was upheld with a simple and straightforward ‘yes’ or ‘no’?
Its quite simple Billy – much like yourself.
No amount of your jumping up and down screeching like this is ever going to get anyone to accept or run with your flawed premise that the important issue is a simplistic yes or no answer over the least important aspect of the sequence of events. Period. End of. Live with it. Like it or lump it.
You ain’t going to get your own way young sprog. Do you ken?
Whilst “It didn’t go anywhere” is the definition of a categorical no in any case, your fixation and obsession with an irrelevancy in the larger context suggests you would rather avoid talking about the more relevant questions of this current self styled ‘left’ MP’s relationships with those who have the capability to obtain information exchanged in conversation between two individuals neither of whom spoke to anyone else about the content of that conversation.
Now, one wonders why that might be?
You’re the one furiously digging. I’m very calm and relaxed thanks We’ve just been watching the sun go down over the ocean and we are about to sit down and enjoy dinner You on the other hand appear to have got your knickers into a right old twist.
You were the one who brought it up so you can’t blame people for being interested in what you did or said that warranted an investigation and the outcome of that investigation. Many will have noted your very carefully worded response above and will be wondering why.
Who said anything about any kind of investigation Billy? I certainly did not. Once again, you put words into other people’s mouth which were never said or implied to suit your own alternative reality Billy.
This constant mis-representation is simply your feverish imagination running away with you – again.
People are complaining all the time but no one necessarily does anything about it. Your continually obsessing about the least interesting aspect of something you’ve been already told more than once went nowhere whilst ignoring the most relevant issue is suggestive of an unhealthy frame of mind unable to deal with anything beyond the most simple yes/no zero sum binary.
The health service is clearly not working properly for you. Have you tried lobbying your MP to obtain better medication?
Trots never change and they will use anything to gain members. Foucault, Lacan they call them up as if they were mediums.
I’m still waiting for the resident noncecase to openly condemn dewey, glanville, and the rest of the smarmerist labour party involved in the cover up of deweys sickening crimes, allowing Dewey to resign AND stymying any internal inquest or subsequent mention of dewey.
…And I include keef in that.
But, like cherie blair looking for a shithouse window to climb out of when faced with the bill, the resident noncecase swerves any acknowledgement of the shitshow, and point-blank refuses to condemn the actions, or the perpetrators.
Preferring instead to mention another sex-case from the Corbyn era as if it was some sort of get-out.
Well it just isn’t. Therefore, the only conclusion that can be reached is that wee gobshite openly supports child sex offenders and those who harbour them.
Toffee – https://skwawkbox.org/2024/05/17/hackney-councillors-quit-labour-form-independent-socialist-group/#comment-255206.
“You’ve never once condemned dewey, nor glanvile,nor the chief exec, nor smarmerite labour.
So what? If that is the case then I’m guessing that I didn’t feel the need to condemn Dewey because I naturally presumed that any right minded person would agree with me that Dewey’s behaviour was abhorrent. As for Glenville and the Chief Exec of the Council (like you) I don’t know enough about precisely what the contents of their conversation was to pass judgement and as for the Labour Party could you please detail precisely what they did wrong and when.
Fortunately we don’t all feel the need to run around shouting ‘nonce’ and along with a wide range of expletives to prove to ourselves what a ‘big man’ we are. Is this your second childhood.
Which is it, are you are too lazy or too dumb to get even the basic facts right
Toffee – Here’s the time-line of who knew what and when about the Dewey case. What would you have done and when would you have done it. What legal mechanism would you have used?
Thomas Dewey (TD) was arrested on 29/04/2022 just 6 days before the election on 6/05/2022 and 24 days after the latest date that candidates could be changed in that election.
The National Crime Agency who carried out the raid and arrest did not inform Hackney Council about TD’s arrest until 13/05/22 a week after the election and Hackney Council’s Chief Executive did not inform the Mayor Philip Glanville (PG) until a day later on 14/05/22.
The Chief Executive of the Council officially informed the Labour Party on 16/05/22 10 days after the election took place.
It has been reported that when TD was confronted on 16/05/22 he immediately resigned both his seat and his already suspended membership of the Labour Party.
Given that to date there doesn’t appear to be any evidence that the Labour Party knew anything about TD being arrested and bailed until at least a week after the election had taken place then any assertions that Labour allowing TD to stand in the election knowing that he was on bail for the possession of child porn appears to be nothing more than ill-informed hyperbole driven by factional prejudices rather than the known facts.
Maybe an enquiry will reveal further details but until someone comes up with some credible evidence that presents a radically different time-line on who knew what and when then it looks like the Labour Party were never in a position to prevent anything to do with this and given their knowledge at the time acted appropriately throughout.
Its the first two words of your response grass you up
so what.
And again with your ‘timeline’ in an attempt to mitigate for those who have tried to whitewash the whole shitshow.
It doesn’t start and stop with the animal being allowed to resign. You make NO mention of the clampdown on hackney CLP to hold an inquiry into the whole shitshow.
You assumed any right minded person would agree with you about deweys abhorrent behaviour
Your record of mitigation for smarmerist child harming policies and actions means that NOBODY in their right mind could naturally assume you condemn deweys action. Not only had you made no mention of it, but again you’ve mitigated for it and tried to evade the main issues. And you still do.
It won’t have escaped anyone’s attention that your condemnation had to be dragged from you.
so what.
Despicable. We KNOW what you are
Toffee – See my response above https://skwawkbox.org/2024/06/06/independent-candidates-stand-aside-to-give-mcintyre-a-clear-run-at-phillips/#comment-255842
Oh, it appears the first response actually went through…
Still, it was worth saying twice. And it’ll be worth bringing up again the next time keef and you cover for wrong’uns.