Analysis Breaking

Far-right Bannon endorses Starmer

Less than a week after Labour tried to use comments by BNP’s Nick Griffin to smear George Galloway, Starmer receives his own extremist – and criminal – endorsement

Last week, Labour talking heads and supporters tried to tarnish George Galloway’s landslide win in the Rochdale by-election by pointing out that the BNP’s far-right figure Nick Griffin had spoken positively about Galloway’s win. Galloway, known for taking no nonsense from interviewers, pointed out that he has no control over what people say, but this did not deter desperate Starmeroids from using the tactic.

Today, news has broken that Keir Starmer has been endorse by US far-right figure Steve Bannon, the architect of Trumpianism and a convicted criminal, who said he is ‘very impressed’ by Starmer. Right…

Bannon also infamously talked of Trump ‘declaring victory’ despite losing the 2020 presidential election – and appeared to allude to the storming of the Capitol by a right-wing mob:

Unsurprisingly, the so-called ‘mainstream’ media hasn’t leaped to the obvious conclusion that if Galloway is bad because a right-wing extremist spoke positively about him, then presumably Keir Starmer – endorsed by someone arguably far worse – is, too.

But grassroots commentators are enjoying much merriment at yet another smear blowing up in the face of Starmer and his acolytes – and with far more justification, given Starmer’s extreme affinity for police state laws, assaults on democracy and genocide.

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

37 comments

  1. We must not forget Starmer’s (and Mandelson’s) membership of America’s Trilateral Commission …… The political arm of US foreign policy for running the World Order.
    Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Bannon finds Starmer so attractive.

  2. Bannon asked the dunce truss (during the rant about a so-called “extremist party potentially being elected in Rochdale…”

    “Rochdale ..is t that where they had the grooming scandal?”

    Yes….Yes it is indeed, bannon.

    And who was the director of public prosecutions at the time? 😙🎶

    1. I’d forgotten Starmer’s atrocious behaviour on grooming gangs. If even ‘Full Fact’ and other pro-Establishment ‘fact-checking’ distortion machines cannot find evidence that DPP Starmer acted fairly and appropriately (see below), then he almost-certainly didn’t.

      “Mr Starmer was the head of the CPS in 2009, when a key decision not to prosecute a case in Rochdale was taken. However, we can find no evidence he had any personal involvement in the decision, or that it was due to concern about Islamophobia.”

      He did and it was.

      1. qwertboi – Or to put it much more succinctly and accurately, you don’t have a shred of evidence to support your nonsense. 🥱

      2. Qwertboi…They said the same about the decision not to prosecute Savile, or Smith, or Janner. What was SirKidStarver doing when he was DPP?

      3. baz2001 – Well one of the things he did was revise the CPS’s guidelines to facilitate the successful prosecution of the disgusting individuals who were preying on vulnerable children. Scores of them are now serving long sentences due to the actions that Keir took.

      4. …”you don’t have a shred of evidence to support your nonsense. 🥱”. True, SteveH, but the ‘nonsense’ – and my hatred of Starmer – is not really about Starmer’s alleged-Islamophobia, more his abject dishonesty.
        I’m sure he was hardly interested in a few badly-educated bad Muslims grooming working class children for under-age sex, when the powerful ‘elite’ had more important victims to demonise (Spoiler, it wasn’t Saville, Jenner or Smith (thanks, baz2001), nor Fred Goodwin).
        He’s a servant of the Security State because the Security State is dedicated to the supremacy of the P_owers that Be, their everlasting Privilege and Power.

      5. qwertboi – Oh dear, I’ll file that along with your opinions on the Covid pandemic and vaccines.🙄

    1. Toffee – “The buck stops here”

      Which is why Keir showed leadership by setting up detailed and far reaching enquiries into what had gone wrong and then implemented the enquiries findings to fix the problems. These changes enabled the successful prosecution of scores of offenders including those that the CPS had previously failed to prosecute.
      You really should try doing a bit of research 😔

      1. Whay a prick

        Keef’s THE reason it went wrong, you fucking idiot.

        Implemented the inquiries to fix the problems ???

        Hahaha! The complete nonce-enabler spunked your subscription on an ad blaming sunak for allowing nonces to walk the streets.

        But it was KEEF wrote the sentencing guidelines ,when – as were forever reminded – he was DPP.**

        Therefore DO shut the fuck up, and refrain from your piss-weak attempts at defending the indefensible.

        **And a shite one at that.

      2. Toffee – As I said earlier do some research. It’s really obvious that you have never bothered inform yourself by reading the contemporaneous findings of the enquiries and the actions that Starmer took to address the findings. Ignorance is not an excuse when it is wilful.

      3. I’ve done the research, gobshite.

        Keef wrote the sentencing guidelines after the CPS – under the direction of one keef smarmer (then) QC FAILED the children of Rochdale, Rotherham, savile and many, many others.

        And when those guidelines ensured that nonces were getting community service orders (for the most depraved sexual offences) instead of jail – and make NO mistake that nonces get by far the most lenient sentences of ALL criminals – keef decided that even though the ads had nothing to do with him, the buck for nonces walking the streets scot-free rests firmly with sunak.

        So take your ‘you really ought to do your research’ and cram it sideways up your hoop for as far as it’ll go, you morally and functionally perverse simpleton.

      4. Toffee – “I’ve done the research.”

        Really, well you are obviously not very good at it are you?
        Here’s a hint for you, take a look at the respective responsibilities and duties of the executive and the Sentencing Council.

    2. Toffee, why does somebody feel the need to defend a person who protected Establishment paedophiles?

      What does said person have to hide?

      1. baz2001 – Oh for goodness sake give it a rest, you’re the saddo who is running around making accusations that you can’t substantiate.

        Jimmy Savile’s victims call on Boris Johnson to withdraw Sir Keir Starmer accusations
        Jimmy Savile’s victims have called on Boris Johnson to “straight away” withdraw his discredited claim that Sir Keir Starmer failed to prosecute the sex offender……
        ………..A lawyer whose firm represented some of the victims of the late broadcaster said he has spoken to them and they want Mr Johnson to “withdraw these comments and apologise, and I call on him to do that right away”.
        Richard Scorer, head of abuse and public inquiries at Slater and Gordon, added: “I echo the widespread disgust at what we saw and heard in the House of Commons yesterday as Boris Johnson tried to distract from the Sue Gray update.
        “As one of the lawyers who represented many of Savile’s victims, I can confirm that these allegations against Sir Keir Starmer are completely unfounded and unjustified.
        “Sir Keir did more than any other director of public prosecutions to advance the rights of victims.
        “No DPP can control every decision. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was much better under his leadership.
        “Weaponising their suffering to get out of a political hole is disgraceful.”

        Perhaps you should take note 😔

      2. https://skwawkbox.org/2024/03/07/far-right-bannon-endorses-starmer/#comment-253276

        And further to that post, hoyle was just on local news telling the reporter he’s had death threats, and that he WASN’T pressured by keef smarmer into shitting on the origInal SNP opposition day motion by steamrollering KEEF’S amendment to the vote.

        The lying, wannabe-ennobled, careerist RAT BASTARD.

        I couldn’t give less of a fuck if the misery that’s been heaped upon those innocent palestinians is visited a thousand-fold on the fucking lot of them smarmerist and zionist MPs.

        And those who think keef somehow deserves some sort of credit for instigating further division and hatred.

        God stiffen every man-fucking-jack of yas.

        The fucking LOT of ya can burn for an enternity AFAIC.

  3. Keef on keef, leader of smarmerist labour: ‘The ads weren’t anything to do with me’ (just like Rochdale, Rotherham and savile weren’t when he was dpp)

    …But sunak’s the PM, and he’s the one allowing nonces to walk the streets because he’s the one adhering to the sentencing guidelinesI wrote…And i only wrote them because someone else – NOT me – fucked up.

    Always someone else, innit, keef?

  4. As per the headline of this thread ..
    “Starmer receives his own Extremist – and Criminal – endorsement”.
    Why are we not surprised ?? !!

    1. johnsco1 – The difference is that in Keir’s case he has no control or influence over the likes of Bannon who may have many different ulterior motives for saying what he has, whilst George Galloway is the one who actually supports the likes of Putin and Assad.

      1. Which,of course totally exonerates keef’s fanatic unequivocal backing for the extreme right-wing, (not so) borderline nazi, genocidal psychopaths netanyahu, ben gvir, gantz, gallant, et al, doesn’t it?

        And you need to bear in mind that george galloway has far less chance of being the political leader of the uk than keef.

      2. You denying keef supports the far right Israeli government, now?

        And I’M the one sounding more and more desperate??

        Yeah, ok.

      3. Toffee – Have you bothered to read the Labour Party motion that was passed by the HofC a couple of weeks ago?

      4. Anything that emanates from the *labour* party since April 4th 2020 can indeed be euphemistically but accurately described as a ‘motion’.

        Fancy a so-called opposition party leader shitting all over breaking parliamentary protocol to demand his own way as a favour to a bunch of homicidal manics from foreign shores.

        Worse still, is that YOU deign it as some sort of meritorious achievement.

        But then again, you have an undeniable penchant for seeing children harmed.

        Because you’re a godawful fucking wrong ‘un.

      5. Putin and Assad might be better for world-peace and justice than the likes of Netanyahu, Biden and Starmer.

  5. You couldn’t make it up, Stammer has changed Labour. Labour was democratic socialist, it’s now neo-liberal new right

  6. Toffee, Why does the Caribbean Goat Botherer keep interrupting other people’s conversations ?

    Maybe the goats have rejected him again….Or maybe we have touched his paedo apologist raw nerve.

    1. baz2001 – Aww diddums, were you hoping to find a safe space where nobody would challenge your nonsense.?

      1. Little Goat Chasing boys should be seen and not heard, so don’t interrupt somebody else’s conversation unless you are invited to, you annoying turd polisher.

      2. baz2001 – Aww diddums. if you don’t want to be challenged the solution is in your own hands. Stop posting things that you know to be untrue.

    1. Toffee – Is that a picture of you proudly showing off your new clothes with childish glee or just a picture of one of your heroes?

Leave a Reply to SteveHCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading