‘Civil war’ in Enfield after ‘anti-corruption’ candidates withdraw Labour nominations in protest

Labour group AGM last night turned into farce after candidates withdrew in protest

The annual general meeting (AGM) of Enfield council’s Labour group had been re-arranged after the right-wing council leader failed to obey a binding instruction from Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) to stand for re-election.

But when it took place last night, it collapsed into farce after protests by ‘anti-corruption’ candidates across the Labour political spectrum withdrew their nominations for key positions in protest at the ‘unconstitutional’ process that had sidelined members and the Enfield ‘local campaign forum’ (LCF).

An email sent out ahead of the meeting by the LCF chair explained some of the issues:

In spite of the LCF vote, Labour’s London region ruled that the meeting had to proceed, because the full council AGM was due to take place tonight. But councillors from the left and right of the party who had nominated themselves or been nominated as an ‘anti-corruption’ group withdrew – not only in protest at the ruling but in outrage at the alleged conduct of a right-wing faction around the council leader.

Complaints made to the Labour Party, whose investigation is still ongoing, include anti-democratic selection processes as well as darker behaviour including bullying, intimidation, discrimination and even threats of violence.

Those who withdrew to defend member democracy include ‘moderates’ such as Daniel Anderson, who was standing for election as deputy leader of the council and who has been heavily critical of council leader Nesil Caliskan and her allies – and even the former council leader Doug Taylor, a former member of the right-wing Progress pressure group.

Enfield’s council cabinet now includes a number of councillors – in senior positions – who failed their interviews as potential candidates and who were put through for selection anyway: the core of the ‘irregularities’ under investigation by the Labour Party.

Those ‘irregularities’ were overseen by Nesil Caliskan, then LCF secretary and now leader of Enfield Council – voted into position by the same councillors who had failed their interviews.

One senior local Labour figure told the SKWAWKBOX:

It’s civil war here now. People are genuinely scared and the intimidation has begun again. We’ve got people from across the spectrum outraged and there are numerous threats to quit the party.

Labour has got to step in.

Nesil Caliskan has previously said that she does not wish to be contacted by the SKWAWKBOX for comment.

SKWAWKBOX view:

Labour intervened in Sandwell – the West Midlands heartland of Labour First. Enfield has been in the grip of the Labour hard right for far too long – and the extent of the problems there is underlined by the fact that those outraged by it and opposing it come from the left, right and middle of the party equally.

A situation in which councillors are in physical fear cannot be allowed to continue – nor can one in which the council’s leadership and cabinet have been put in place ‘unconstitutionally’.

Labour’s NEC must suspend the whole Labour structure in Enfield and build it again from scratch, if that’s what it takes.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

6 responses to “‘Civil war’ in Enfield after ‘anti-corruption’ candidates withdraw Labour nominations in protest

  1. On policy matters clearly as much time as possible should be given to thought and discussion in the interests of better policy decisions.
    On corruption and other abuses though speed is of the essence – partly because accused persons deserve justice not to be delayed but more because we need to be seen to address quickly anything that shames the Party.
    If the NEC and other regulatory structures need to be expanded to bring swift justice to those who dishonour the Party, so be it.
    If motions need to be put to conference, poll last year’s delegates on line in emergencies. Waiting another year for decisions that would have been taken last year if time hadn’t run out is a nonsense – so 20th-century.

  2. dinary what is going on there,what are Labour Party headquarters waiting for?

  3. Caliskan appears determined to bring the Labour Party into disrepute. She has no scruples, no party loyalty and no shame about her disgraceful misconduct. She is also very close to the insidiously treacherous Joan Ryan and will probably end up being invited to join CUK anyway.

    It’s time to take a very serious and much more hard line approach by looking closely at the bigger picture and then to begin the process of expelling the treacherous elements from within the party.

    Being reasonable, of course, is always the best first step in dealing with such alleged treachery but, unless it’s two way traffic, there must be a time limit; a much shorter cut off point when it has become blatantly obvious there will be no improvement in conduct or behaviour.

    There clearly are many truly committed democratic socialist members in the constituency who should be given more encouragement and motivation alongside open opportunities to take the helm as a matter of urgency. This would send out a clear signal nationally too.

  4. Civil war in Enfield but disbelief and delirium in Tottenham!

    COME ON YOU SPURS!!!😀😀😀

    • Indeed, COYS!

      Caliskan Out You Slaaaaags!

      (Oh, and city & tottenham victories, or else the cultist weirdos of the shite will be insufferable)

  5. Just a thought. Do some of the people running Labour in Enfield have anything in common with some of those running Labour from national HQ?

Leave a Reply