Corbyn calls on MPs to accept “historic duty” – and declare climate emergency with “no time to waste”

Climate-change protest in Parliament Square tonight from 5pm
Corbyn appeared in a new video

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will lead a debate today calling on the UK Parliament to be the first in the world to declare an environment and climate emergency.

Opening the debate, Corbyn will urge his fellow MPs to accept their “historic duty” and back Labour’s motion. He will use his speech to make a passionate and comprehensive case for “rapid and dramatic action” for social and environmental justice. On current rates of decarbonisation, and following government cuts to renewable energy, the UK will only reach net zero by the end of the century, which is at least 50 years too late,.

The Labour leader will argue that we are already seeing the effects of climate change, including extreme weather in the UK. He will tell MPs they should listen to those “who bear the highest cost” and are “least to blame here and around the world for the destruction of our climate”.

Corbyn will tell the Commons that he was “deeply moved to see the streets outside this parliament filled with colour and noise by children on strike from school chanting ‘our planet, our future’and that “Parliament rarely leads change, it usually drags its feet” but will urge MPs to “not repeat that pattern” and “respond to the younger generation” by saying “we hear you”.

Climate justice campaigners, including UK Student Climate Network, Momentum and Extinction Rebellion are organising a demonstration in Westminster in support of declaring an emergency.

Corbyn will also call attention to the “terrifying loss of animal and plant species” and the impact we are having on our soil. He will argue that “without pollination and healthy soil, there is no food and without food, there are no humans.”

He will caution against despair and tell MPs “it is time for action”, arguing that the scale of this emergency requires “reprogramming our whole economy” with “large-scale government intervention to kickstart industries, to direct investment and to boost research and development in the green technologies of the future.”

Calling for the declaration of an environment and climate emergency, Corbyn will say:

Today this House must declare an environment and climate emergency. We have no time to waste. We are living in a climate crisis that will spiral dangerously out of control unless we take rapid and dramatic action now.

Young people know this. I was deeply moved a few weeks ago to see the streets outside this parliament filled with colour and noise by children on strike from school chanting ‘our planet, our future’.

For someone of my generation, it was inspiring but also humbling that children felt they had to leave school to teach the adults a lesson. The truth is they are ahead of the politicians on this, the most important issue of our times.

We are witnessing an unprecedented upsurge of climate activism with groups like Extinction Rebellion forcing the politicians in this building to listen. For all the dismissive and defensive column inches the protests have provoked, they are a massive and necessary wake up call.

Today, we have the opportunity to say, ‘We hear you’.

Parliament rarely leads change, it usually drags its feet. Think about the huge transformations to our society: workers’ rights, women’s rights, gay rights. The impetus has always come from outside, from social movements and communities, while Westminster is often the last place to understand it. Let’s not repeat that pattern. Let’s respond to the younger generation who are raising the alarm.

By declaring a climate emergency, we could set off a wave of action from parliaments and governments around the world.

It’s a chance that won’t be available to succeeding generations. It is our historic duty to take it.

Corbyn’s video released yesterday

Raising the damage to our environment, the ecology it supports and Labour’s ‘Green Industrial Revolution”, he will say:

The warming of our climate is contributing to the terrifying loss of animal and plant species that we are only just recognising. Earlier this year, the first global scientific review of its kind found that insects could become extinct within a century unless action is taken. Insects pollinate plants and keep the soil healthy. Without pollination and healthy soil, there is no food and without food, there are no humans.

Meanwhile intensive farming is pumping the earth full of fertilisers and taking its toll on our soil. The Environment Secretary himself has warned that we only have 30 to 40 years left before our fertile soil is “eradicated”.

The facts say that it is an emergency. But an emergency does not have to be a catastrophe. We could use it as an opportunity to rebuild our economy so that it works for the many not the few.

What we need is a Green Industrial Revolution, with huge investment in new technologies and green industries. It is a chance to bring new manufacturing and engineering jobs to places that have never recovered from the destruction of our industries under Margaret Thatcher.

The hidden hand of the market is not going to save us. Technological solutions are not going to magically appear out of nowhere. An emergency of this magnitude requires large-scale government intervention to kickstart industries, to direct investment and to boost research and development in the green technologies of the future.

The solution to the crisis is reprogramming our whole economy so that it works in the interests of both people and the planet. This is not a time for despair. It is a time for action.”

Labour has started a petition demanding Parliament declare the emergency. Sign it here.

The full text of Labour’s Parliamentary motion is as follows:

That this House declares an environment and climate emergency and resolves to act with commensurate urgency following the finding of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that to avoid more than 1.5°C of warming, global emissions would need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050; recognises the devastating impact volatile and extreme weather will have on UK food production, water availability, public health, flooding and wildfire damage; calls on the Government to increase the ambition of the UK’s climate change targets under the Climate Change Act to achieve net zero emissions before 2050, to increase support for and set ambitious, short term targets for the rollout of renewable and low carbon energy and transport, and move swiftly to capture economic opportunities and green jobs in the low carbon economy while managing risks for workers and communities currently reliant on carbon intensive sectors; further notes that the UK is currently missing almost all of its biodiversity targets, with an alarming trend in species decline, and that cuts to Natural England of almost 50 percent are counterproductive to this end; and calls on the Government to bring to the House within the next six months a series of urgent measures to restore nature and move towards a circular, zero waste economy.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. Extinction Rebellion (ER), has been exposed as a front for globalisation and what some are describing as a Fourth Industrial Revolution.

    1. So what, exactly, are you saying about climate change and Corbyn’s initiative? Are you disagreeing with the concept, or the organisations involved?

      I’m unclear.

      From a personal perspective, I am aware of significant changes taking place in the environment. For 40-odd years, I have observed a particular area of the Inner Hebrides where simple explanations of obvious local human interference just don’t apply. No vast local population expansion; no local pollution or intensive agriculture etc.

      Yet there has been a noticeable change in the ecology – particularly in the last 5-10 years, with a marked decline in insect life and, whilst the number of species has held steady – or perhaps even increased (White-Tailed Eagles and Corncrakes), there seems to have been a similar decline in the absolute number of birds.

      Closer to home, I reckon that the regular observations that I made only some ten years ago in contributing to the last Atlas of British Breeding Birds would be significantly different today.

      Something significant is happening in the wider environment, and the curve seems to be steepening.

      1. I’m saying that Corbyn and the left should be very careful not to get caught out playing the “useful idiot” for globalists who see another easy way to send all the money to the top.
        There is only one way to tackle climate change and it doesn’t involve any subsidies or hidden takes or pretend carbon capture and storage, if you think about it the ‘green subsidies’ are a way of taxing the wind, sun and tides. The only solution to climate change doesn’t involve start-ups, bogus charities or pretend NGOs. It demands we dump capitalism, globalism, resource exploitation, chasing ever higher growth targets and consumerism. In other words, it ain’t going to happen, but don’t live under the illusion that this lot of fakes are anything but. And don’t kid yourself that every last drop of oil won’t be pumped, squeezed, fractured out of the ground.

      2. “In other words, it ain’t going to happen”

        So – are you saying that some form of extinction scenario is inevitable, and that we might as well just enjoy the ride?

        A more positive version of this, I suppose, is the notion that extinctions happen – so what? It kicks starts a new evolutionary direction.

        An interesting take.

      3. I’m not saying that at all, I believe we should fight to our voices heard and not be subject to clever marketing. My pessimism stems from the ease of the diesel campaign which convinced so many to buy large diesel cars. The current campaign uses Greta Thunberg cleverly to promote, with a few choice words of a foreign language a campaign designed and funded by corporates, fake charities, global business interests, with links to oil companies and people who provided al Qaeda and the White Helmets with com’s equipment in Syria.

      4. “It demands we dump capitalism, globalism, resource exploitation, chasing ever higher growth targets and consumerism.”

        The only problem is that this is like recommending goodness and self-sacrifice in very abstract terms.

        ‘Capitalism’ and the urge to acquisition isn’t just imposed – it operates with assent. Any change similarly has to be engineered – it won’t simply emerge from a return to a Rousseau-esque ‘state of nature’ that excludes negative impulses. Acquisition is a product of any such notional state as much as co-operation.

        That implies action at the level of government is necessary … which brings us back to Corbyn’s initiative if there is any choice to be had.

    2. lundiel

      Not heard that one before. Where did you hear or read that? And if a 4th Industrial Revolution means a boom in (Labour-Nationalised) Green industries and manufacturing, isn’t that a good thing?

      1. It’s about money. And we all know that we get the scraps only.

        Ingmar Rentzhog


        Capitalism has to keep expanding. And there’s a lot of tax payers cash whizzing around, waiting to be vacuumed up by financial entities to keep it expanding.

        We need to change the system. The current system will continue to poison our environment. This is about prolonging our system, for the select few

      2. lundiel

        Aw, so ER are AstroTurf? And I thought they were just what society needed. I hate it when some conspiracy theory comes along and tries to squash my hopes. There isn’t much hope to be had these days, as I’m sure you’ve noticed!

        I’m always up for a good conspiracy theory, but am also aware that some are the products of attention–seeking negative creeps, from the “Paul McCartney died in the mid-60s and was replaced by a remarkably gifted double” one to the “Macron ordered the fire at Notre Dame” one.

        And my initial reaction is it’s one of those, but I’ll bear it in mind for a while before dismissing it entirely. Let’s see what happens next…

        Thanks for the link, though!

  2. JC nails it again – we need action on climate change and biodiversity loss right now, not in 50 years time. Today we need to sort the parliamentary ‘fossils’ from the ‘future makers’.

  3. Consumerism has dominated the group mind for too long – tax breaks seem to be one of the only tools not claimed to be repressive by the neo’s so maybe start with partial vat refunds for keeping your phone and car for three or four years instead of one.
    The manufacturing processes and harvesting of raw materials are a large part of the problem, not just what comes out of the exhaust pipe.
    Population reduction in Capitalist terms is a disaster – fewer customers, fewer contributing to the pensions pot etc. but that’s just tough.
    In a socialist economy keeping population stable or dropping can be rewarded – every resource lasts longer and pressure on the rest of the ecosystem falls.
    The resources we rip from the planet, the need for monoculture, food, fuel and water poverty and so many other problems reduce or go away after a couple of generations of responsible reproduction.
    Please don’t point to China, it’s not relevant.
    We need fewer people. We knew this in the sixties.

  4. Correction: We need fewer people and so does the rest of life on this planet.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: