Breaking: Corbyn – “We’ll scrap SATs for primary kids”

Corbyn announces move in speech to National Education Union conference

In a speech to the National Education Union’s (NEU) conference in Liverpool today, Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn will set out his party’s plans to abolish the “regime of extreme pressure testing” for primary school children.

The policy would relieve pressure on a schools system forced to cope with overcrowded classrooms, the first cuts to school funding in a generation, and an ongoing crisis in teacher recruitment and retention.

Too much pressure on children

Corbyn will criticise the testing culture in England’s schools, which makes our children among the most tested in the world, and will announce that the next Labour government will scrap SATs for seven and eleven year olds along with baseline assessments for reception classes.

High-stakes and high-stress testing is placing primary school pupils under huge pressure, leaving some in floods of tears or vomiting through worry.

Labour will consult with teachers and parents to develop a more flexible and practical system of assessment that is tailored to individual pupils and “prepares children for life, not just for exams”.

Trust in teachers and a broader curriculum

The new system will trust and empower teachers to deliver a broader curriculum, not a rigid assessment regime. Labour has previously committed to encouraging teachers to remain in the profession by scrapping the public sector pay cap and ending cuts which have led to teachers begging parents for money to pay for basic supplies.

On primary school testing, Corbyn will say:

We need to prepare children for life, not just for exams.

SATs and the regime of extreme pressure testing are giving young children nightmares and leaving them in floods of tears.

I meet teachers of all ages and backgrounds who are totally overworked and overstressed. These are dedicated public servants. It’s just wrong.”

On Labour’s alternative assessment:

Our assessment will be based on clear principles. First, to understand the learning needs of each child, because every child is unique.

And second, to encourage a broad curriculum aimed at a rounded education. When children have a rich and varied curriculum, when they’re encouraged to be creative, to develop their imagination, then there’s evidence that they do better at the core elements of literacy and numeracy too.

And on teaching:

Teachers get into the profession because they want to inspire children, not pass them along an assembly line.

We will raise standards by freeing up teachers to teach. Labour trusts teachers. You are professionals. You know your job. You know your students.

“Jeremy Corbyn gets it”

Commenting on the announcement, NEU Joint General Secretary
Dr Mary Bousted said:

Jeremy Corbyn gets it: he recognises the damage that a test-driven system is doing to children and schools; he understands what needs to change; he sets out ideas for education which will make sense to parents and teachers.

The NEU has long advocated an assessment system that has the trust of teachers and school communities – one that will support children’s learning and raise standards of attainment in our schools.

We look forward to the return of a broad and balanced primary curriculum and to the rekindling of the spirit of creativity in our schools. We welcome Labour’s commitment to work with the profession in order to develop these ground-breaking policies further.

SKWAWKBOX comment:

On education – and on the NHS, public services and our entire social fabric – Labour ‘gets it’.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. At last! Well done, Corbyn, for battering down the unholy consensus of the pontificating dimwits that has hamstrung the politics of education ever since the days of Baker, and was channelled by Blnkett and Co. to the shame of the Labour Party. It’s been a long time coming – but better late than never.

    The wider damage will take a lot of undoing, but it has to start somewhere.

    1. Oh roll on a change of govt!
      What a breath of fresh air, to hear a clear common sense approach towards primary schools….. But this same approach has to be applied to secondary schools too.
      Especially in key areas of concern including SEND, punishment via these isolation booths, FTE’s. ect .

      Then kick business out of the whole equation, because that’s been an abject failure!

      1. I agree that change needs to go much further. But there has to be a start.

        What makes me really sad is that the seeds of the mess that we have now was sown, in great part. by ‘Labour’ governments.

        Undoubtedly, the Blair years saw some praiseworthy investment – and the odd really good initiative such as Cildren’s Centres. But it also saw the undermining of a coherent local education service as it bowed to right-wing rhetoric about the private sector. Thus we had the massive missing-the-point of the Adonis cunning plot of ‘academies’.

        I watched the predictable catastrophe happen with dismay. Experienced staff retired – both in schools and at local authority level, to be replaced by young (cheaper) teachers, newly trained in a surfeit simplistic, crap ideas and, at the management level, a generation of sharp suits and pointy shoes out to make a fast buck and knowledgeable about little but bullshit. The marker is someone who calls him/herself ‘Chief Executive’ – or some such. Never trust any educationalist with that sort of title.

        Meanwhile , Ofsted grew into a monstrous political tool (remember Blunkett’s love affair with Chris Woodhead?) that warped the whole process of education chasing simplistic targets with crap statistics. The whole enterprise reinforced existing social divisions as spurious ‘measurement’ revealed the ‘superiority’ of wealthier intakes. In parallel, the curriculum became increasingly impoverished.

        So … all that – and its related consequences – will take a lot of unpicking. But at last there is a significant political voice that doesn’t go along with the received crapology about ‘standards’ equating to top-down balderdash.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: