R-wing blood running cold as Sandwell meeting cancelled by NEC ‘exceptional circs’ rule

sandwell gp

In the early hours of this morning, the SKWAWKBOX described the chaos infecting the Labour right in its heartland of Sandwell borough in the West Midlands.

That chaos had been manifested in the calling of an unconstitutional meeting for the sole purpose of passing judgment on a councillor who has inconvenienced the local Establishment – followed almost immediately by the cancellation of the same meeting.

Sandwell is home to Labour First string-puller MP John Spellar, to deputy Labour leader Tom Watson and to Labour’s West Midlands regional office, which the right has controlled along with local Labour structures for as long as most people can remember.

The borough has been the scene of a huge number of complaints against party officials, councillors and MPs – and the suspension of Sandwell’s ‘LCF’ (local campaign forum) sent shockwaves through the Labour right in the West Midlands and beyond.

If Labour can bring the hard right to book in Sandwell, the right is not secure anywhere.

So the news that the cancellation of the ‘desperation measure’ meeting in Sandwell was triggered by the intervention of Labour central will be a rallying call to the left and send shivers down right-wing spines.

The meeting, which was scheduled to take place on Monday 16 July, was cancelled by the invocation of chapter thirteen of the Labour Party rulebook, which governs the behaviour of ‘local government Labour groups on principal authorities’ – specifically clause thirteen, point four of that chapter which says:

Where the NEC determine there are exceptional circumstances, the NEC Disputes Panel shall be charged with the responsibility to undertake procedures relating to a breach of these rules,  thus in such instant relieving the Labour group and Local Campaign Forum executive of such powers.

The LCF has already been suspended by the party pending the investigation of a raft of complaints about anti-democratic practices and bullying –  but faced with the prospect of Sandwell council’s Labour group also being relieved of its powers, the group backed down and a hasty message cancelling the meeting without explanation was sent to all councillors and the local constituency party executive officers:

slg2

Comment:

The Labour right has been used to acting with impunity in the West Midlands and in Sandwell especially, with the assistance of its supporters in the regional office.

Cold sweats will be breaking out at the realisation that the national party under its new General Secretary is no longer prepared to stand by.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

4 responses to “R-wing blood running cold as Sandwell meeting cancelled by NEC ‘exceptional circs’ rule

  1. Pingback: Please support the SKWAWKBOX. Here’s what it’s been doing | RedZine·

  2. Skwawkbox does some great things, but backing a Tory collaborator against the left-leadership of a Labour council is disappointing. Sandwell is complicated and it’s more about right and wrong than right and left. The old guard reinventing themselves to get back into power springs to mind…

    • Unconstitutional meetings are unconstitutional meetings. If people are guilty of something, arrive at the conclusion via due process

  3. Time to hold the poorly read, uncritical thinking, wheeler dealer, “Parliamentary Cretinism” (bourgeois politicians) ‘fake socialists’ to account. Ironically this despicable Right Share much with the bourgeois socialists of the far left and sectarian left – neither will never really win working people to their ideas (though the Right are pretty devoid of these) unless you are honest.

Leave a Reply