Labour First pins its NEC hopes on ‘vote-splitters’

The contest for three additional places on Labour’s NEC (National Executive Committee) is intensifying after the SKWAWKBOX publicised the fact that the website for the ‘independent’ slate is funnelling the details of anyone who registers straight to the right-wing groups Labour First and Progress – and revealed the closeness of the contest between ‘independent’ Eddie Izzard and ‘left slate’ Jon Lansman, the founder of Momentum.

Labour First even referenced the SKWAWKBOX’s revelation in its latest missive to its email list, albeit with sloppy formatting, poor spelling, hyperbole, dog-whistle terminology and a persistent fallacy:

lf nec.png

Labour First are still calling their slate ‘independent’, a claim many Labour members consider laughable.

However, they also let slip their hope that one or more non-slate candidates will get onto the ballot to siphon votes from the left slate.

The additional left candidates Labour First is pinning its hopes on as vote-splitters are certain to get onto the ballot as only five nominations are needed. However, when ballots start to arrive at the end of November, votes for them are an indulgence that no pro-Corbyn member can afford in a tight race and with so much of the impetus of the real-Labour project at stake.

For those who wish to see the Corbyn review and the remaking of a genuine Labour Party in the image of its members succeed, there is simply no room for anything but discipline, focus and an absolute determination to get the job done – and certainly no room for cul-de-sac candidacies that can only impede the achievement of the real goal of offering the country a real and stable alternative to the Tories.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

8 responses to “Labour First pins its NEC hopes on ‘vote-splitters’

  1. By falsely describing others as hard left, Labour First unwittingly exposes itself as a right wing organisation.

    It is worth remembering that those on the right of the Labour party support apartheid regimes and also homophobic/misogynistic regimes like Saudi Arabia, a dictatorship which chops people’s heads off and exports and funds terrorism.

    A vote for candidates supported by Progress and Labour First is therefore an endorsement of racism, homophobia and misogyny.

    Liked by 5 people

    • “A vote for candidates supported by Progress and Labour First is therefore an endorsement of racism, homophobia and misogyny.”

      And do not forget that these organisations are pro-nuclear weapons and pro-war.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Pingback: Labour First pins its NEC hopes on ‘vote-splitters’ | Jaffer's blog·

  3. Pingback: Labour First pins its NEC hopes on ‘vote-splitters’ | Hercules space·

  4. LABOUR FIRST, DOTH MAKE TOO MUCH NOISE, AS THEY ARE RUNNING SCARED, KNOWING FULL WELL THEY DON’T HAVE, A SNOWBALL IN HELLS CHANCE OF WINNING ANY RIGHT WING ELECTION TO THE NEC!
    JUST A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES ON THE RIGHT AND FAR RIGHT STILL PUSHING (BLUE) TORY POLICIES!
    HOW THEY CAN CALL THEMSELVES LABOUR FIRST IS A COMPLETE MISNOMA!
    MY ADVICE IS FORM A PARTY AND RUN FOR OFFICE INSTEAD OF BEING DRAGGED AROUND ON OUR COATTAILS!
    BARKING LIKE THE RABID DOGS YOU ARE!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s