Exclusive: the next big #Torycampaignscandal? #GE17

As the national press has reported, the Conservative party is spending a huge amount of money on ‘wraparounds’ – additional pages to form the front and back page of a newspaper – in key General Election constituencies.

The wraparounds have been seen in across England and Wales (reports of any in Scotland have not yet reached the SKWAWKBOX) in marginal constituencies and are designed to look like a normal newspaper front-page. Many appeared last week as voters went to the ballot box for the local elections, causing a rash of complaints to publishers. The Conservatives are said to be planning a series of wraparounds in target constituencies in the run-up to 8 June.

The SKWAWKBOX can exclusively reveal that the wording of the ads – many of which have appeared in constituencies where Tory MPs and personnel are already under investigation for alleged election spending fraud in 2015 – may again create issues with the allocation and reporting of the spending and to the breaching of candidate spending limits.

Below are images of the front and back page of a wraparound that went out on The Standard, a weekly local Cheshire publication that includes the marginal Weaver Vale (WV) constituency in its distribution area. WV was narrowly won in 2015 by Tory Graham Evans. Mr Evans was one of the MPs whose electoral expenses were under investigation by police, although controversially his case was not referred to the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service):

tory wraparound weaver vale outertory wraparound weaver vale

The Tories are apparently trying to avoid the cost of these wraparounds – thousands of pounds for each one – being allocated as a local expense by not mentioning the name of the local candidate.

However, even mentioning ‘my Conservative candidate in your local area’ would be enough to qualify the expense as a local one, at least in part.

However, according to the SKWAWKBOX’s conversation with the Electoral Commission’s (EC) press office this afternoon, the EC rules on election spending would still require at least a quarter of the expense to be declared as local spending rather than national, as page 17 of the EC’s paper on splitting campaign expenses makes clear:

ec p17.png

An EC spokesperson told the SKWAWKBOX that the issue has already been raised with the EC and that its Campaign Monitoring unit is aware, although a formal monitoring request has not yet been made.

Declarations of electoral spending will not be made until after the election is over, but if the Tories run regular adverts – wraparounds or others – with this kind of wording between now and the election, the costs per publication are likely to be in the tends of thousands of pounds.

Given that – as the EC confirmed to this blog – the legal limit on local election spending will be around £15,000 per constituency, even a quarter of the amount spent on these ads, if properly allocated, are likely to consume a large percentage of a candidate’s legal spending, drastically reducing the amount that can be legally spent in those areas on other campaign activities.

 

If the Tories wish to avoid a further breach of electoral spending laws, they will need to be careful both to account for this spending properly and to ensure that the correct proportion of the cost of these wraparounds is deducted from their local campaign budgets.

The SKWAWKBOX contacted Conservative Campaign HQ (CCHQ) with the following:

As just discussed, looking at the wraparounds that the Conservatives have been using on local publications around the country, the final page of these refers to voting for ‘my Conservative candidate in your local area’. According to the Electoral Commission, this would be enough to qualify that page as local expenditure even if the candidate’s name is missing.

In view of this, please provide answers to the following by return:

1. What is the average cost of a 4-page wraparound?
2. How many of these wraparounds are planned per local publication/area?
3. Is the Conservative party planning to declare at least a quarter of the expenditure as local in accordance with Electoral Commission rules?

To which a Conservative spokesperson provided the following response:

 

Newspaper advertising covers are a long established form of campaigning that are [sic] used by all political parties. We are proud to support local newspapers.

Right.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you found this information helpful and can afford to, please do click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

11 responses to “Exclusive: the next big #Torycampaignscandal? #GE17

  1. I am going to call it.

    May will not increase her wafer thin majority.

    As a result she will be forced to resign.

    That’s when the game really begins.

    Like

  2. One of the problems with most “local” newspapers is that they are not produced locally in any meaningful sense.
    “A LOCAL NEWS DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT
    Six companies account for over 80% of local newspaper titles – more than four times the combined number of titles published by the remaining 56 publishers – and 85% of revenue.”
    http://www.mediareform.org.uk/…/Who_owns_the_UK_media-report_plus_appendix1.pdf

    Is it possible that this ‘local’ newspaper stunt is the next version of the Cambridge Analytica ‘assistance-in-kind’ previously seen in the Brexit campaign? Leave.eu didn’t *pay* for that election adverstising assistance, it was a ‘gift’ … “They were happy to help,” said Leave.eu’s communications director, Andy Wigmore.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage

    Are the Tories paying for these “local” adverts? Or are they being ‘gifted’ by Tory-supporting newspaper owners? The Electoral Commission say that you should declare services-in-kind if they amount to more than £7,500.

    … just a thought …

    Like

  3. Pingback: Exclusive: the next big #Torycampaignscandal? #GE17 | Jaffer's blog·

  4. Pingback: May 8 2017 – “The Next Big Tory Campaign Scandal” | Gatwick City Times·

  5. Democracy for sale in Britain… very sad for the country. But not surprising: they’ve sold off pretty much everything else we owned collectively.

    Like

  6. Pingback: Exclusive: the next big #Torycampaignscandal? #GE17 | paulh121·

  7. Pingback: May 11 2017 – “Is the Tory Party breaking the law?” ~ Richard W. Symonds [Gatwick City Times] | Gatwick City Times·

  8. Pingback: Across the country, something special is happening. The ground is swelling #GE17 | The SKWAWKBOX·

  9. Pingback: May starting to disappear from Tory campaign literature #GE17 | The SKWAWKBOX·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s