Labour ‘reeling from Copeland’? No, Labour winning in THE CITY OF LONDON

PoliticsHome and the Huffington Post have run this morning with stories of a Corbyn ‘staffing crisis’ with a supposed ‘exodus’ – three people, two of whom are leaving for health reasons (no speech marks on that, thank you).

Neither contains a single word from any of the staff who are leaving, as no doubt their comments wouldn’t fit the narrative.

The articles are little more than an attempt to manufacture the perception of Labour falling apart or, as the Huffington Post puts it,

still reeling from its defeat to the Conservatives in the Copeland by-election

Lazy, contemptible ‘journalism’.

Meanwhile, in actual news worthy of the name but which seems glaringly absent from the mainstream, Labour was busy last night – not ‘reeling’, but winning.

In the City of London, no less.

Five seats on the authority’s two-chamber council.

Let’s put this into context: Labour don’t win in the city of London. Even Reuters – about the only source to make much of the news, is calling it ‘historic’:

reuters city.png

Why is it historic? The City is the heart of the country’s finance industry and natural Tory territory. Until 2008 or so, Labour didn’t even bother to field candidates, so low were its chances considered. In 2009, Labour won a single candidate.

Last night, in the midst of a so-called crisis and supposedly disastrous polling, Labour won five. Five out of eight, no less.

Are things tough for Labour right now? Of course – with an incessant media onslaught (even the Westminster terror attack was being used to smear Labour on radio this morning – a new low even for right-wing ‘journalists’) determined to paint Labour as unelectable, things are not going to be easy.

But if anyone tries to claim pollsters and pundits have a clue how to interpret the current, volatile soup of politics and pontificate about who’s electable and who isn’t, point them to this:

Labour winning five times more seats than they have ever won, in a single night – in the very bosom of finance-capitalism. And as a socialist party under a socialist leader – not some lukewarm, curdled-milk, ‘centrist’, ‘business as usual’ offering.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you found this information helpful and can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

18 responses to “Labour ‘reeling from Copeland’? No, Labour winning in THE CITY OF LONDON

  1. Pingback: Labour ‘reeling from Copeland’? No, Labour winning in THE CITY OF LONDON | dainagregory·

  2. “Lazy, contemptible ‘journalism’.”

    Hmm. Pot calling the kettle black? Your own website started a whole story, based on hearsay, unnamed sources and rumour, on the subject of the staffing of the Leader’s Office, only to withdraw it.

    Like

    • From multiple sources, who turned out – as far as we can tell at the moment – to be wrong. The SKWAWKBOX issued a correction. Do you seriously think we’ll see one from the likes of PolHome?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Brendan with respect , if you don’t like the site stop reading it , it’s simple really , we can all make up our own minds regarding the accuracy and validity of the articles . Pot / Kettle , wow take a look at the MSM if you want lessons . Me , I am grateful that we have bloggers ( a whole range of sites in fact ) who can be bothered to put in the voluntary time and effort to counter in some small way the deluge of crap we get from the MSM. Maybe you could try blogging yourself , see if you can do better ?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Fair point. But if I blogged, I would put my name to it. Meantime, you can read my abbreviated thoughts on Twitter @BOBRIEN451 (which has my name).

        Like

  3. Labour has been fielding candidates in the Square Mile for over fifty years. Belle Harris, later a LB Tower Hamlets councillor, came close to being elected to the Court of Common Council in the early 1960s. Labour did not win any seats in 2009. Yesterday Labour were standing in six contested wards (that elect a total of twenty-nine Common Councilmen) and won four sears.

    Like

    • Take it up with Reuters, since they say it only started after the crash and say five wins out of eight. Four or five out of six is even better – do you have sources for those numbers?

      Like

      • Your website, your mistake (wherever you copied it from). Sources are the ‘Statement of Persons’ nominated and the results page on the City of London Corporation website

        Like

  4. Pingback: Exclusive: Labour senior source – there is no ‘staff crisis’, they’re just scared of Karie | The SKWAWKBOX·

  5. Can I just say, Thank you, you are doing a fantastic service to the Labour Party & Jeremy’s campaign for a fairer Britain, keep up the great work.

    ________________________________

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s