Analysis Uncategorized

Lammy says he told Iran it would be ‘catastrophic mistake’ for it to retaliate for unprovoked US attack

But decision to attack Iran was only Trump’s to make – arrogance of ‘poodle’ UK government ought to be shocking

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said he told his Iranian counterpart that it would be a “‘”catastrophic mistake” for Iran to retaliate for the – unprovoked and almost two weeks before a Trump deadline for Iran to respond – failed US attack on its civilian nuclear facilities.

But, he added, the US decision to commit the – unprovoked and under an effective flag of truce – attack was one that “only [Trump] can make”. Lammy thinks Trump can unilaterally decide to launch an unprovoked attack, but the victim must not fight back:

Clip from Daily Record (fair use).

Lammy also admitted the UK has “forces in the region” – his boss Keir Starmer, who evidently believes international law applies to Iran but not Israel, has refused to say that the UK will not assist the US in attacking Iran – and claimed it would also be a mistake for Iran to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, the nearest to a non-violent retaliation that Iran has at its disposal and one that would quickly inflict massive damage on the US and UK economies, because the Strait carries a quarter of the world’s oil and a third of its natural gas.

In other words, the US might continue to attack Iran and the UK might help Trump do so, but Iran should just sit back and take it and not resist or do anything that might cause inconvenience.

The arrogance of holding such a position, let alone saying it out loud so shamelessly, ought to be shocking. That it isn’t is a telling verdict on the toxic poodle-clown regime of Keir Starmer.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.

17 comments

  1. Lammy says he told Iran it would be ‘catastrophic mistake’ for it to retaliate for unprovoked US attack

    Whether this proves to be sound advice or not is dependent on how Trump responds if he is poked in the eye with stick.

    Does anyone care to hazard a guess?

      1. Dave – Whether Trump has been ‘had’ or not is subjective and largely irrelevant, we are where we are.

        How do you think that Iran should respond to Trump’s attack?

        I wonder what Putin will advise the Iranians to do 🤔

      2. I would not presume to be so David Lammy as to suggest how a sovereign people SHOULD respond to the war crimes committed against them.

        I might very well have some ideas about how they might well respond. However, that was not the question which you asked.

      3. Dave – Instead of wasting our time trying too hard to impress a simple ‘I don’t know would have sufficed

    1. It’s not my problem when you are too gormless to ask the right questions, Billy.

      Have you considered saving up to get an IQ?

      1. Dave – ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        There’s bound to be someone out there who will be suitably impressed 🥱, if only we were all as clever as you think you are. 😔

      2. Is there an echo in here, or has the Norwegian Blue just fell of it’s perch?

  2. To think we have “Mastermind” Lammy in the government at all. I wouldn’t have him in charge of paperclips!

    1. An observation which could legitimately substitute a plethora of names across not only the UK but the entire West.

      Meanwhile, here’s a tale of two different approaches:

      1. ….and Russia offers the services of the Wagner Group and the Africa Corps. 🤔

      2. Given that US military bases are considered sovereign US territory by the USA I think you mean that Iran has attacked the US.

      3. So Lammy is defining yet another state that is not allowed to defend itself against illegal attacks by that there genocidal terror state…………?

      4. Thank you for your Vicky Pollard impression.

        Don’t call us, and don’t give up your day job – assuming you have the ability to hold one down.

Leave a Reply to SteveHCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading