Analysis Breaking

Video: Iran strikes Israeli Ministry of Interior

Interior minister Moshe Arbel oversaw deportation of Palestinians from Gaza. Now his HQ is in ruins along with another Israeli spy HQ

Iran has made a direct hit on Israel’s Ministry of Interior building in Jerusalem, leaving a flaming wreck this morning:

Israel’s interior minister Moshe Arbel, whose headquarters is now in ruins, is the government figure responsible for arranging deportation flights to remove Palestinians from Gaza during Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing of the besieged territory:

Iran continues to strike even the most supposedly secure government sites, with the technical development HQ – the Negev Advanced Technologies Park – of the notorious Unit 8200 military spy outfit, which has coordinated strikes on Palestinian civilians throughout Israel’s genocide in Gaza, also hit:

Even as it bleats about Iran’s strikes on its own cities, Israel continues to slaughter and starve Palestinians, mostly women and children, in Gaza, with the assistance of the UK government and military.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.

16 comments

  1. War is bad. As of June 21, 2025, the Israeli military reported that at least 24 Israeli people have been killed in Israel since the start of Iran’s retaliation bombing of it – that’s not even two-hours worth of the 377,000+ innocent Palestinians that have been slaughtered and starved by Israel in Gaza.

    1. Ooops, it’s nearly one hour’s worth (not 2) of Israel’s murder-toll-
      War against Gaza is into its 14,250+th hour.
      More than 377,000 Palestinian people have died.

      377,000/14,250 = 26.46

  2. Interesting to note that the Israeli’s like to attack and bomb or just target places that can entail mass civilian casualties, whereas the Iranians are targeting military/ intelligence/government sites that have entailed minimal civilian casualties.
    For the noises coming out of our own political class, if this were 1939, the UK would be classed as on the side of Hitler.
    That is a truly shocking and deeply shameful thought.
    The only good thing is that it looks as if Netanyahu has really bitten off more than he can chew this time, with ramifications that extend over much more than the Middle East.
    Finally, with reports that the Israeli Air Force has had to remove its aircraft from their own airfields, to airbases in friendly neighbouring areas, would the British government allow the Israelis to launch a retaliatory nuclear bombing raid from a place such as RAF Akrotiri? We should be told, because that would, in the current era, be the Mother of All War Crimes.

    1. Never mind no permitting Israel lunching a nuclear attack, the UK shouldn’t assist Israel in launching attacks of any sort against any neighbours whatever they are: Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians or Iranians.
      It should do what Iran did in 1993 during the 1st Gulf War when Iraq under attack, moved its fighters jets to Iran. Iran impounded them.

    2. Does anyone here know how Israel’s nukes are delivered – ie are they dropped from the air, launched from silos/mobile launchers on land or a combination of the two?

  3. Here’s journalist Richard Medhurst, yes, that Richard Medhurst, demolishing the Western propaganda narrative about the alleged Iranian nuclear programme:

  4. Here’s the headline and a couple of clips from an excellent aticle by Jonathan Cook, posted a couple of days ago:

    Israel’s attack on Iran: The violent new world being born is going to horrify you

    The claim that Israel is “defending itself” in attacking Iran – promoted by France, Germany, Britain, the European Union, the G7 and the US – should be understood as a further assault on the foundational principles of international law.

    The assertion is premised on the idea that Israel’s attack was “pre-emptive” – potentially justified if Israel could show there was an imminent, credible and severe threat of an attack or invasion by Iran that could not be averted by other means.

    And yet, even assuming there is evidence to support Israel’s claim it was in imminent danger – there isn’t – the very fact that Iran was in the midst of talks with the US about its nuclear programme voided that justification.

    Rather, Israel’s contention that Iran posed a threat at some point in the future that needed to be neutralised counts as a “preventive” war – and is indisputably illegal under international law….

    Netanyahu, who is already a fugitive from the International Criminal Court, which wants to try him for committing crimes against humanity in Gaza by starving the population there, is now guilty of the “supreme international crime” too.

    Not that one would know any of this from listening to western politicians or the billionaire-owned media.

    There, the narrative is once again of a plucky Israel, forced to act unilaterally; of Israel facing down an existential threat; of Israel being menaced by barbaric terrorists; of the unique suffering – and humanity – of Israel’s population; of Netanyahu as a strong leader rather than an out-and-out war criminal.

    It is the same, well-worn script, trotted out on every occasion, whatever the facts or circumstances. Which is clue enough that western audiences are not being informed; they are being subjected to yet more war propaganda.

    https://www.jonathan-cook.net/2025-06-19/israel-attack-iran-new-world/

  5. The illegal Zionist Occupation Force is taking a bit of a battering concerning its military industrial complex.
    Iron Drone can’t cope with Iran’s ballistic missiles.
    Iran could take out every Israeli & US base in the Middle East which is perhaps why 11
    US nuclear powered aircraft carriers are on their way with strike force missile destroyers which will take a week to get there.
    Perhaps they aim to protect the 19 US military bases in the Middle East which have 40,000 US personnel.
    Is a brilliant piece in the latest New Left Review Sidecar blog today (21/6/25) by Tariq Ali who points out it was originally the USA in the 70’s that pushed for Iran to have nuclear weapons under their then puppet The Shah & US Dick Cheney’s company was heavily involved in this before the US post Shah was to later change track.
    Apparently Iran’s Supreme Leader froze any possibility of Iran having a nuclear weapon in 2003 as it was Un-Islamic.
    The question is Trump: “Punk do you feel lucky?”
    Though Iran could face a lot of destruction
    is he willing to sacrifice ordinary Americans for (a) Zionism & (b) a share of Israel’s profits from their land theft of Gaza & other Arab land plus Gaza’s oil & gas?
    If it is callous to its citizens it is probably driven by (b).
    These calculating ‘human beings’ are different to us; we would want peace and a solution but Western capitalists as usual dehumanise themselves & as the true little people of the planet delude themselves.
    Why don’t they just get their butts out of the Middle East.
    A Free Democratic Multi-Ethnic State of Palestine From The Rivers To The Sea could exploit its own resources to benefit world trade & own diverse citizens.
    Western Capitalist Barbarians should stop using violence to try to achieve their political ends.
    Yours In Peace.

  6. Caitlin Johnstone, fourteen hours ago… totally unbelievable:

    Tulsi Gabbard Is A Warmongering Asshole

    President Trump has twice thrown his own intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard under the bus, repeatedly telling the press that the national intelligence director was wrong when she told Congress in March that the American spy network does not believe Iran is attempting to obtain a nuclear weapon.

    To be clear, when Gabbard made this statement she was not voicing her personal opinion, she was repeating verbatim the findings laid out in the 2025 Threat Assessment of the intelligence agencies of the United States, which said “We continue to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and that Khamenei has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003, though pressure has probably built on him to do so.”

    Despite this, Trump has been publicly expressing disdain for his intelligence director, flatly saying “she’s wrong” when asked about Gabbard’s testimony on Friday, and saying “I don’t care what she says” when asked the same question about Gabbard’s statement earlier this week….

    Rather than push back on the president’s crude dismissal, Gabbard took to social media to tell everyone that Trump is actually right about Iran, and that everyone who thought she said Iran isn’t seeking a nuclear weapon is imagining things.

    “The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division,” Gabbard said on Twitter. “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree. My full testimony below:”

    Bizarrely, Gabbard accompanied this text with a video clip of her congressional testimony in March which in no way validates anything she says in her post. Nowhere in the clip….

    https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/tulsi-gabbard-is-a-warmongering-asshole-62052b18500d

    I wonder if any MSM in the US or Europe/UK is covering this, and calling Trump out, AND Gabbard?! I think we can be pretty certain that the vast majority of them won’t be, and quite likely not a single one of them! If something the same happened with Putin and his intelligence director, it would of course be the main headline news right across the MSM. Talking of which, check out the article Jonathan Cook posted yesterday about the BBC (link below).

      1. Whilst Cook is spot on, the issue goes wider than the BBC and beyond the crimes the Western media are covering up in Gaza.

        Here’s Declan Hayes…….

        https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/06/21/battle-plan-iran-nato-latest-extermination-campaign/

        Hayes’s point is very straightforward in the wider context of the lawfare being used to silence not only any criticism of the propaganda narrative but also any alternative view to the TINA doctrine.

        Indeed, far from being some esoteric debating point, Hayes’s argument is a serious one focusing on the very real life and death implications for any alternative voices of the present escalatory trajectory.

        Beginning with the IDF attack on an Iranian TV station…..

        “In one of their recent spectaculars, the IDF blew up a television station in downtown Tehran, an outrage that made global headlines because the Iranian lady who had been reading the news at the time maintained a traditionally stiff upper British lip as the building came crashing down around her ears and those of her colleagues. Not only was Israeli warlord Netanyahu quick off the mark cackling that an important tentacle of the Iranian “regime” had been hit, but he was preempted by Sky News Australia’s Sharri Markson, who likewise cackled that the attack had cripped Iran’s propaganda arm.

        All fair enough except for the following reasons. I have been in that building and most of the staff are just ordinary Joes (or Alis and Zeinabs, if you prefer) doing their jobs. They are as inconsequential to the overall play as are any of the Iranian children killed in any of the many residential apartment buildings that the gallant IDF destroyed without warning during the same wave of unprovoked attacks.”

        …….Hayes then focuses on the Western media reaction to what is a war crime in itself and how that reaction very clearly signals the OK to green light any alternative view as a legitimate target:

        “Not only is all that a war crime but Markson makes Sky News Australia and, by extension, Murdoch and all the western media fully complicit in that war crime and she has made those like George Galloway, Judge Napolitano and all those informed commentators who appear in their shows “legitimate targets” for not kowtowing to the NATO yoke.

        Chief of those targets isTehran University professor Mohammad Marandi, a solid media performer who generally puts forward the Iranian line and does so with aplomb. And, though Westerners may not agree with Marandi or, for that matter, with Galloway, the traditional way to defeat them is to confront them with equally capable performers, who have their own lines of argument mastered.

        Although the traditional methods of arguments were to argue the facts and, if that failed, to argue the circumstances and, if both of them failed, to call the likes of Galloway and Marandi names, Markson and all of NATO have now resurrected an equally ancient line of attack, which is to murder the messenger and declare their victims were spreading misinformation, disinformation or whatever. Whatever about Galloway, Lowkey and similar folk, there is no way NATO will allow the likes of Marandi, who feels it his patriotic duty to argue civilly, to come out of this war in one piece and the Iranian authorities are to be commended for telling him his life hangs by a thread.””

        Cook himself, along with a whole plethora of voices, would likely be viewed as a legitimate target by those in the oligarch owned and controlled Western Media cheering on these war crimes – whether in Gaza or Iran – who are doubtless sick of the existence of the existence of challenges to their bullshit narratives and those posing that challenge.

        As Hayes implies, emboldened by their own exceptionalism escalating to that level is not that far away. We may even be already there.

  7. Hmmm. The video of the burning ministry of interior building in Jerusalem also shows a wide river in the back ground. Wonder what is the name of the river in Jerusalem? The river Fake maybe?

      1. The governmental building in Haifa which was hited 3 days ago is nowhere near the sea and the only river in Haifa is the Kishon, which isn’t near either and much smaller then what is shown in the video. And I’m wondering why Skwawbox moderation allows personal insults?
        Also, until a couple of weeks ago the Skwawbox was quite precise, helpful and very informative but we are witnessing a deteriorating in the quality. Just for an example from the latest report that a third of Tel aviv, the capital of Israel (it isn’t) is in ruins – this is over the top exaggeration and put a question mark on the rest of the reports.

Leave a Reply to RonCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading