Dire local election results left Starmer with just 14% of vote and losing TWO THIRDS of the seats Labour tried to defend
Keir Starmer suffered a worse defeat during last week’s local elections than any new prime minister since records began, losing 65% – a fraction under two thirds – of the seats Labour was defending. These are the kind of results normally expected of a failing government after years in power and are not only worse but far worse than any comparably new government in history:

In 1977, after being in government for three years and just two years before being dumped from power, Labour lost 48% of the council seats it defended. The only comparable loss in terms of percentage was in 2009, when Labour lost 62% of its seats after twelve years in power.
According to elections expert John Curtice, Labour’s vote share last week fell to just 14% – which, as former MP Claudia Webbe has pointed out in the Morning Star this week, was far below Labour’s previous worst ever performance. As Webbe noted:
Early projections had put Labour at 20 per cent, which would have already been its worst since the 1980s. These were quickly adjusted to 19 per cent, which would have been the party’s worst local election performance in 124 years since records began — so the final result five points lower than that was catastrophic for Keir Starmer’s party.
Despite this, most UK ‘mainstream’ media have given it scant attention, instead focusing on the Tory collapse to Reform, while Starmer has promised to go even more to the extreme racist right to chase Reform votes.
As Skwawkbox has said before, the only scenario in which Starmer is anything but grotesquely incompetent is if his real job is to kill the Labour party and usher in fascism. Many people have long believed it.
Please remember to support Skwawkbox if you can, to help ensure it can keep running. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (Skwawkbox will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount as it has to be entered by us). Alternatively, if you prefer to make a one-off or recurring donation by simple card payment, please use the form below:
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyThanks for your solidarity so Skwawkbox can keep doing its job of inconveniencing the right and helping to build the left!
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.


Sometimes (No, ALWAYS) it’s great to be proved right in what I said FIVE YEARS ago. Though far from great for those who, PREDICTABLY suffered!
But Coooooooorbyn…
Remember how the resident used to complain about how many council seats corbyn lost?
198 seats in only 23 councils keef managed to relinquish.
There’s 317 councils in England. Works out to around 2400 councillors keef’d be light of, had it’d been the whole lot up for grabs.
And that’s not including the ones who’d be found out to be nonces and allowed to resign instead of being disowned like that animal in hackney.
There’ll be calls for a general election after the next set of locals.
Spot on. Five years ago you couldn’t move for right-wingers in the Labour Party saying hos Corbyn was unelectable, worst GE since 1935, he needed to resign after the locals. Strangely they have all gone quiet but for the “He (Starmer) can’t fix things in only a year!” No, but even the longest journey starts with a single step … in the right direction. Starmer isn’t even facing the right way!
All together now:
“Things can only get………….”
Privatised? Taxed? Abandoned?
I give in…
Sounds Right: ‘The party’s worst local election performance in 124 years since records began’. Starmer’s party is getting 7 from every 100 votes available to it at elections.
The TUC is not affiliated with Labour. It simply points to policies that it supports. In other words, policies which promote:
– workers’ rights,
— social cohesion, and
— community welfare.
i.e. STARMER-FREE policies.
‘The Left’ is Labour. Starmer/Reeves/Streeting and Morgan McSweeney, et el, aren’t: They are its enemies and “Labour’ in name only (LINO). Seven-in-100 votes are Still more than Starmer’s ‘Labour’ deserves. Even that will be widely un-achievable to it at future elections.
Why isn’t the Caribbean Goat Herder coming to the defence of Keith ?
Steady now baz.
You’ll be getting smeared as an acolyte or someone’s puppet (evidence not required, apparently).