Analysis Breaking

Video: Leadbeater says talking a loved one out of suicide is ‘coercion’

Right-wing Labour MP’s ‘corporate-assisted dying’ bill – backed by Starmer – is full of danger for ordinary people

Right-wing Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s so-called ‘assisted dying’ bill – which the government intends to turn into a corporate cash cow – is full of dangers to ordinary people and especially to those who become vulnerable.

In January, Leadbeater’s committee supposedly putting together safeguards to prevent abuse of her ‘unfit for purpose‘ bill was rightly criticised for voting to hold key discussions in secret, avoiding public scrutiny and raising serious doubts about her original claims that there would be full transparency in the debate and ample safeguards to protect vulnerable old and sick people from pressure to die.

Last month, Leadbeater announced that the assisted suicide process would now not, as at first promised, require sign-off by a High Court judge – instead only needing approval by a social worker or psychiatrist, supposedly because High Court judges would be too busy to look at applications for death and make sure that there was no coercion or pressure and that no one standing to profit would be influencing the wish to die.

Leadbeater has refused to exclude disability, Downs Syndrome, diabetes, arthritis or anorexia as a reason to kill someone despite international evidence that people suffering those conditions have been coerced elsewhere, ignored expert psychiatrist witnesses after lecturing them that they didn’t understand suicide in terminal illness and has been accused of treating the last months of someone’s life as “so self-evidently not worthwhile that there is no need to ask about, or offer help with” any issues relating to undue or ‘modifiable’ influences pushing someone toward suicide.

Earlier this month, the Starmer government confirmed it intends to farm out the killing process to corporations who will do it for profit and this week, Leadbeater – who has dismissed concerns that her proposed process won’t prevent people being coerced into dying either by families or by government seeking to cut costs – said, out loud, that anyone trying to talk a loved one out of suicide is itself coercion:

Under a government full of compassion and right thinking about the wellbeing of the poor, sick and disabled this would be worrying enough for its potential for abuse and the bullying of the vulnerable into ‘not being a burden’. Under a government of sociopaths who are waging war on the vulnerable and freely use ‘useless eater’ rhetoric that disability and sickness benefits are ‘unsustainable’, it is chilling.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so, but please include the donor information above – see here for more.

5 comments

  1. I wouldn’t talk leadbeater and the rest of the smarmerites out of suicide.

  2. in some countries suicide is not a crime. But encouraging someone to commi suicide and not alerting helplines, police, emergency services etc is a crime

  3. The tragedy of this debate is it should have been about the most personal & difficult decision that human beings, who love each other, can make and I support this right.
    But it has been “A dog’s breakfast led by top down political lightweights.”
    Socialists suggested how it could have been put into practice WITH Disabled citizens & Older People’s reps who MUST be there, drawing on their humanity at the top table and also protecting Disabled citizens & older people from its potential abuse by future Right Wing Governments.
    But apparently it has now been kicked into the long grass not to be implemented until 2029 and disgustingly Labour plan to put it into the hands of profiteers, so Right Wing Neo – Liberal Labour know the price of everything and the value of nothing!
    But perhaps Grotesque Labour (out of its human depth) has really passed the buck onto the next Govt?
    I could weep for those whose are suffering now plus their loved ones; believe me from personal experience it is the greatest love to let someone go.
    If only Socialist, Compassionate, Critically Thinking human beings had been in the driving seat.

  4. We still got the Liverpool pathways still running under another name so putting another one for them to abuse isn’t the way forward would you trust stammer anough said

  5. Under the Mental Health legislation since 1983 people deemed to be a risk to themselves or others can be detained on the two signatures of either a ASW (Approved Social Worker) a psychiatrist, approved S7 medical doctor or other ancillary mental health professional for example a CPN or OT specialising in Mental Health.
    I don’t see why a Judge would be more qualify that a trained medical doctor or a specialist SW, CNP etc. would be. If anything I would trust a SW to ensure that the views of the person seeking to end his/her life are heard rather than a judge and a solicitor.
    To involve a Court order would make the whole process more cumbersome and phenomenally more expensive without making improvements in terms of safety for the individual.

Leave a Reply to Maria VazquezCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading