Analysis comment

Apartheid Starmer attacks judge who extended asylum ‘meant for’ (white) Ukrainians to Palestinian family

Judge made ‘wrong call’ says man abusing terrorism law against journalists, ‘we’ll close that loophole’

Keir Starmer has criticised a judge who granted asylum in the UK to a Palestinian family after they applied through a scheme originally meant for Ukrainian refugees.

Devoted Zionist Starmer told reporters that he wants to close the ‘loophole’ that a judge used to grant asylum to a family slightly more brown than the overwhelmingly white – and 45% blond – Ukrainians fleeing a war that Ukraine’s ambassador admitted Ukraine and Russia would have settled years ago had Boris Johnson not told the Ukrainians to walk away from peace negotiations.

Clearly allowing people into the UK who in Israel are fleeing a genuinely genocidal, white-supremacist attacker who has no interest in peace and wants their extermination or complete removal and their whole land is not something the supposed ‘former human rights lawyer’ – whose regime is misusing anti-terror laws to persecute journalists – wants.

But Upper Tribunal judge Hugo Norton-Taylor allowed the Palestinian family to come to the UK on the basis of their ‘very strong’ right to a family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), leaving Starmer fuming, presumably at the idea that people could be allowed to escape Israel’s genocide without being forced into the Jordanian or Egyptian desert. Norton-Taylor said in his summation:

We conclude that the respondent’s (Home Office’s) refusal of the collective human rights claim does not, on the particular facts of these cases, strike a fair balance between the appellants’ interests and those of the public.

On a cumulative basis, the weight we attach to the considerations weighing on the appellants’ side of the scales demonstrates a very strong claim indeed. Put another way, there are very compelling or exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, the appellants’ appeals are allowed.

The Labour right is deeply and unrepentantly racist and has a long history of abuse toward Muslims, Black people and other minority groups. White Europeans from a country with nazis in its government are evidently another matter and Starmer intends to change the law to reflect that – no less than a form of UK apartheid.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

4 comments

  1. It should also be mentioned that when Jewish refugees were trying to flee Nazi Germany the Labour Right in the form of Home Secretary Herbert Morrisson were equally hostile as to Starmer today. Of course then it was genuine antisemitism not the fake kind we have today

  2. Didn’t PM Gordon Brown once apologise to the Israeli Ambassador about a decision made by a British judge?

  3. Clearly Herr Starmer, his Junta, and those who support and cheerlead for their policies at every opportunity (including the wannabe Lord Haw Haw in the (alleged) Caribbean on this site) would much prefer neo-Nazi war criminals armed to the teeth with black market munitions courtesy of redirecting our taxes from the vulnerable to these thugs than those with a [checks notes] “funny Tinge”.

    On which note, the observations in this skwakwbox piece about the misuse of lawfare to persecute, smear and slander anyone going against the official support for a fascist regime being used as a proxy by the Western Ruling class Oligarchy, this dropped in my lap this morning:

    https://glenndiesen.substack.com/cp/157008622

    Which goes into detail of just some of the activities of those fake media and other so-called NGO’s in the pay of out of control US and European three letter agencies.

    Here is just one snippet of a litany of this kind of abuse:

    “USAID, NED and other NGOs also operate in countries allied with the US to prevent dissent and preserve bloc discipline. The Ukraine Crisis Media Centre wrote an entire article smearing me in its project of “shady horses of Russian propaganda”, which listed false accusations such as being a “defender of Russia’s aggression”. The evidence for the absurd accusations included my conversations with Professor John Mearsheimer and former US Senator Ron Paul, which are labelled Kremlin “mouthpieces” by this NGO.[2] The Norwegian government (my own government) is also listed as a donor to this project of intimidation and smears……

    …..After successfully whipping up hatred in the public, the police advised me to hide my address and phone number. At this point, an employee at the Norwegian Helsinki Committee published a picture of my house on social media. These are the activities that my own government finances under the guise of supporting an “NGO” that promotes democracy and human rights. In response to the purge of academic freedom, I am now in the process of acquiring another citizenship to relocate to a country where civil society is not outsourced to fake NGOs pushing war propaganda and censorship.”

    Evidence free smears, slander, falsehoods, outright lies and so on seems somewhat familiar. Now, just where have people who comment BTL on this site encountered such experience from?

  4. If ever there was a better example of the Fuhrer nailing down his own coffin
    Let start a sweep stake on who will be shipped out to the Hague first
    50p on the Chief Rabbit

Leave a Reply to TonyCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading