Analysis comment

Video: Lammy says ‘no journalists in Gaza’ as he tries to avoid admitting Israel-funded looting gangs

Many have been murdered by his genocidal mates, but there are still some and they’re exposing Israel’s crimes against humanity – unlike him

Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s testimony to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee has already been shown to contain several misleading statements to MPs – contempt of Parliament – about what his and the UK’s responsibilities and actions would be if wanted Israeli war criminals Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant ever set foot on UK territory.

But he also made the astonishingly crass claim, as he tried to avoid acknowledging that Israel is organising the looting of the few supplies that get into Gaza to ensure it doesn’t reach those who need it, that ‘there are no journalists in Gaza:

Lammy neglected to mention the almost 200 journalists murdered by Israel in Gaza since last October in targeted killings, or its designation of the few survivors as terrorists on a kill list by Israel as it continues to try to stop the world hearing and seeing its genocide and crimes against humanity there.

He also fails to point out that the reason there are no international journalists in Gaza and no ‘politicians like me’ is the case because Israel will not allow them to enter and report on what it is doing, instead shepherding one or two on ’embeds’ to report on its discredited propaganda.

Instead, Lammy continues to provide political cover for mass murderers and to use his vague nonsense to hide their crimes instead of exposing and opposing them. And in doing so, he and his boss make themselves genocide-accomplices just as worthy of prosecution in the Hague as they are.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

3 comments

  1. I know it isn´t politically correct but, isn´t Lammy a good example of a c—nut?
    For a man that is descendent of slaves to go around supporting a white settler colonial project that is dispossessing the natives of their ancestral lands, engaging in mass murder, starvation and as such committing war crimes and plausible genocide, c—nut is the mildest term that comes to my mind.
    I am sorry if I offend any sensibilities no my intention but, I call it as I see it.

    1. “….Lammy a good example of a c—nut..”

      +1! A ‘working-class tory’.

      1. It’s hard to tell who’s a worse cnut, Lammy or Clive Myrie!

Leave a Reply to Maria VazquezCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading