Analysis Breaking

Woman acquitted over ‘coconut’ protest placard

Marieha Hussain found not guilty of racially aggravated public order offence

A district judge has found teacher Marieha Hussain not guilty of committing a ‘racially aggravated public order offence’ after she held up a sign showing Tory pro-Israel politicians Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman as coconuts during an anti-genocide march in central London. Hussain charged after being photographed with the placard in November.

Hussain told the court today that the sign was “not meant to be offensive” but was instead an example of political commentary and satire:

There was no hate speech. It was a satirical placard. It was funny. It was comic. There were no words on it in reference to ‘speech’. I did not alter the images of the Home Secretary and Prime Minister. [Calling it] hate-speech is far-fetched in my opinion.

Prosecutor Jonathan Bryan claimed that the sign was a ‘well-known racial slur’ that meant Sunak and Braverman are ‘race traitors’. District judge Vanessa Lloyd dismissed his claim, saying that the sign was:

part of the genre of political satire. As such, the prosecution have not proved to the criminal standard that it was abusive. The prosecution has also not proved to the criminal standard that you were aware that your placard may be abusive.

Sunak and Braverman, of course, can easily be argued to have betrayed huge numbers of people irrespective of skin colour – and particularly, through Britain’s complicity in Israel’s war crimes, the two million Palestinians suffering genocide and countless atrocities at the hands and bombs of the Israeli military that has already murdered as many as 200,000 civilians and maimed many more.

The state’s attempt to suppress free speech is part of a wide assaultescalating under Keir Starmer, on freedoms of speech and association, which have included the abuse of anti-terror laws to arrest and prosecute journalists and activists.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

4 comments

  1. Is it ANY wonder the judicial system is bollocksed when ‘cases’ like this are brought before the beak?

    FFS I’ve seen sunak’s fizzog superimposed onto Roland rat’s head.

    Dont remmember any complaint about that.

    But sunak being depicted as a coconut lands someone in court?

    Oh, DO fuck RIGHT off.

    Anyway, at any march, I’d like to see a giant suppository with a picture of weasly screeching’s (inflatable) head attached. See what he makes of that.

  2. Just thos second attaching the ch4 report on this.

    The prosecution used trump’s version of kamala harris’ blackness as a comparison.

    The defence solicitor is said to have them jumped up and explained “You’ve GOT to be joking”.

    I just facepalmed so hard that I think I did myself a mischief. 🙁

  3. We are now a country that would probably arrest Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali.
    In previous years people fleeing American, political, McCarthyite and racist persecution, would come here for temporary or permanent sanctuary. Now decades after Blair put us in bed with the lynchers and unreformed wannabe segregationists of the Republican party, British racism is a dangerously ludicrous as the Americans.

  4. This quote from the judgement might be useful.
    “In his closing speech, Rajiv Menon KC, defending, said: “This prosecution of Ms Hussain is … a disturbing attack on the right of freedom of expression; the right to peaceful protest that did not risk in any shape or form violence or public disorder; the right to anti-racists to criticise members of their own race for pursuing racist policies and using racist rhetoric; the right to satirise our politicians; the right to mock and tease and make fun of our politicians in a light-hearted way that Marieha Hussain attempted to do with her placard.
    “That Marieha Hussain of all people is being prosecuted for a racially aggravated offence whilst the likes of Suella Braverman and Nigel Farage and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – aka Tommy Robinson – and Frank Hester are seemingly free to make inflammatory and divisive statements … is, I’m afraid, incomprehensible to many people.”
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/coconut-placard-trial-sunak-braverman-b2612489.html

Leave a Reply to The ToffeeCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading