Leading medic Kailash Chand: “We have to attack the virus to win – defensive restrictions are not enough”

Locking down without a rigorous test and trace programme as recommended by the WHO will not get us where we need to be

GP and former BMA deputy chair Kailash Chand

Coronavirus is the only show on the planet. Each and every one of us is apotential victim of this virus. Is the NHS prepared? The virus could infect 60% or more of the UK population if unchecked.

One factor that makes Coronavirus harder to control than SARS is that it appears to be possible to infect others before sufferers know they are ill. The scale of this pandemic could easily be comparable with the 1918 Spanish flu – worse than anything we have seen in modern times.

The three key symptoms of COVID-19 are reported as fever, cough and shortness of breath, although not every person infected will manifest all of these and some people may not show any.

We understand that these symptoms usually occur between 2-14 days after exposure, based on what has been observed with the SARS and MERSCoV viruses. Most people will feel like they’ve got a particularly nasty dose of flu – for approximately seven days – and then recover.

A minority of people – especially those with existing heart disease, respiratory disease, diabetes, hypertension, and/or cancer – develop more serious breathing difficulties and these are the ones advised to contact the emergency services.

Of this minority, 20% need ICU care and around 15% of those people die, based on current mortality rates.

Researchers currently think that between five and 40 coronavirus cases in 1,000 will result in death, with a best guess of nine in 1,000 or about 1%. An individual’s prospects depend on a range of factors: age, sex, general health and the health system you are in.

The elderly and those with some chronic health conditions are more likely to die if they contract coronavirus, with men faring slightly worse than women. Your prognosis also depends on the level treatment you get. Medical staff also seem to be at significant risk, perhaps from extended or intensive exposure to the virus, making it particularly urgent for the government to sort out its inability to provide suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) to all NHS staff.

It sounds and looks as if this virus is highly transmissible. As a new virus, its full capabilities and potential are not yet fully understood. London is worst affected, but the rest of the UK will soon be hit with a similar surge if the right measures are not taken.

At a certain point, it becomes less about trying to stop an outbreak from entering a country and more about doing what we can to reduce the damage it causes, goals that tend to require different strategies.

The key steps the government must take to prepare include:

  • several thousand corona beds (15% of patients)
  • self-quarantine of patients
  • no admission for patients without breathlessness
  • remote consultations for mild cases
  • ICU beds with ventilatory care for at least 3% of expected infection numbers
  • listing of hospitals with ECMO (extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation) machines
  • PPE for at least 5 staff per patient per day
  • N95/FFP2 surgical masks available for all staff as recommended by WHO
  • hand sanitisers production capacity of millions per day
  • healthcare staff provided with coronavirus handling training -including retired doctors and nurses
  • an army of persons trained in handling dead bodies of infected cases
  • a team of dedicated mental health councillors to tackle coronavirus anxiety
  • government-imposed price cap on masks and other related diagnostics and PPE
  • correcting and even censoring myths and fake news on social media.

Staff are the most valuable asset of our NHS. They will react with energy and flexibility, but urgent measures must be taken to support their health and wellbeing – for the benefit of all of us.

But are they?

Boris Johnson keeps repeating his claim that the NHS is well prepared to deal with coronavirus. But the vast majority of the medics I talk to strongly disagree!

Lisa Anderson, a consultant cardiologist at London’s St George’s hospital, articulated the concerns of doctors when she told Andrew Marr on Sunday that staff are not getting the equipment they need.

Anderson said the government had changed NHS rules and was no longer compliant with World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, which require a full gown and visor. NHS staff only have to wear a simple face mask, short gloves and a pinafore apron.

This is not just about the risk to us and our families. We are travelling home on the tube, on buses, we are cross-infecting everybody at the moment.

Doctors are worried that the NHS is already stretched and under heavy pressure – and especially that it has too few intensive care beds and that GP surgeries are struggling to meet patient demand.

A&E waiting times were already the worst on record before this crisis. Intensive care units are at capacity and are struggling to admit patients who are critically unwell or awaiting cancer surgery.

Boris Johnson’s Covid-19 strategy dangerously leaves too many questions unanswered. Relying on Herd immunity was total madness. Not testing populations is negligent; keeping the NHS staff without PPE is criminal.

Johnson’s failure to include these basic provisions in his ‘strategy’ will ensure that the virus spreads and will cause more infections and more deaths in the near term.

Without rigorous testing, tracing of contacts and proper equipment, we are fighting a purely defensive battle – and doing so with at least one hand tied behind our backs. You can’t win a football or a cricket game by only defending – you have to attack as well.

To win, we need to attack the virus with aggressive and targeted tactics.

We need to follow tested policies – as practiced by China, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and India – to suppress the epidemic. And we need to hope that a vaccine and reliable treatment becomes available quickly.

We need to act now and act fast. Every day of delay will mean more people become infected or die.

We have to attack the virus to win – defensive restrictions are not enough.

Dr Kailash Chand OBE is an award-winning GP and former deputy Chair of the British Medical Association. He is writing in a personal capacity.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. Be prepared for Dr Kailash’s character assassination by the Tories, Johnson’s cheerleaders in the BBC and the MSM .

    1. Character assassination, is not as deadly as leaving Johnson & his Tory chums unchecked. Dr Chand is doing what is vital. He is saying what needs to be done. He is not hiding from possible attacks. Courage saves. Hiding is of no use. Silence is of no use when people need to hear clear alternatives and assessment of the Tory catastrophe.

      Further, by broadcasting our alternative opinions, Johnson & his Tory chums, won’t be easily able to claim, as Blair & Campbell try re their Iraq Invasion, that every one agreed with them. Or criticisms of their lies and bloodshed of well over a million Iraqis and our troops, are “with the benefit of hindsight”.
      So Dr Chand is putting his foresight out for all to read.

    Our leaders are terrified. Not of the virus – of us
    You can almost smell the fear-laden sweat oozing from the pores of television broadcasts and social media posts as it finally dawns on our political and media establishments what the coronavirus actually means. And I am not talking about the threat posed to our health.

    A worldview that has crowded out all other thinking for nearly two generations is coming crashing down. It has no answers to our current predicament. There is a kind of tragic karma to the fact that so many major countries – meaning major economies – are today run by the very men least equipped ideologically, emotionally and spiritually to deal with the virus.

    That is being starkly exposed everywhere in the west, but the UK is a particularly revealing case study.

  3. Test, test, test. The Government stops testing.

    We have no idea how many people have COVID19 today. How many infestations are asymptomatic? How infectious are asymptomatic sufferers?

    Personal Protection Equipment is not available to the NHS heroes who treat us. China and Cuba want to make more available to us.

    6,205,000 bed days have been removed from the NHS (over half a million in England Aa one) by short-sighted extreme austerity

    HOW CAN WE ATTACK COVID-19 when we are in such a dire place courtesy of Boris Johnson and his Conservative predecessors’ political choices?

  4. This item is more to the point in terms of the key issues for which the Tories *are* significantly responsible – basically those around awareness, preparation and timing.

    Jonathan Cook is, as usual, perceptive.

    … and as a reminder of prior politics, there is an video featuring Moshe Machover on the JVL website.

    If you remember, Machover was the guy who wrote an historically accurate account of Zionism in the early part of the last century. It appeared after Ken Livingstone was under attack for speaking – if cack-handedly – about the Third Reich’s original embrace of the concept of Jews going to Israel, and the major opposition to the ideology within the Jewish community.

    He was suspended. But – significantly – fought back with forensic intelligence and persistence. And won – a lesson that should have been learned more widely.

  5. Chand is absolutely spot on. Exactly as posted on here “test , test, test, trace, & isolate. ➕ Proper protection for frontline. “Herd Immunity”? Employing scientific etiquette – i take a different view. In plain speak, with a deadly virus, allowing spread as per Johnson’s choice is at best nonsense. Thousands of dead are no longer part of the herd. Counter to Tory ideology, those they consider expendable, costly, lowly, surplus to their heartless rampant capitalist Tory approach, those they despise, keep society functioning. The elderly have vast stores of knowledge … experience to help shape a better future society. The “unemployed”, the “idle” have the freedom… the mental space to think in fresh ways about how society could be improved. PROBLEMS: 1️⃣ Tories wish only to improve the few further with more public blood and toil. 2️⃣ Tories know the price of everything but the social value of nothing. 3️⃣ Tories like Boris Johnson DO believe – “There is no such thing as society”.

    PART SOLUTION: It is we who must provide answers. We must make our answers heard and read. Ideas compete for attention in a noisy world. Anxious toiling people… deliberately made to toil and jump through ever smaller hoops need to HEAR, SEE and READ alternatives. At the best of times we need to be aware of ACTIVE alternatives every single hour. At times like these, this vital.

    Thank you Dr Chand

      1. Really?

        … and there was me thinking its the same old neoliberal nuclear same-old, with the usual social stratification and manipulated attitudes to outsiders. 🙂

  6. This all looks eminently sensible, they may get round to listening to what Dr. Chand has to say but probably not until it’s too late.

    One of my work tasks involves pressure-washing pig sheds, for which I wear a mask with replaceable gas and dust filters. I needed to order some for next week; the price online has gone up anywhere between 3-10 times depending where you look. Who says coronavirus is bad news for everybody?


    — A shocking new analysis from disease modellers at Imperial College suggested that 250,000 people would die under the old strategy. Some have reported the U-turn as a triumph for the modelling team, but that’s not the full story. Buried in the report was the admission that only “in the last few days” did the modellers update an assumption about the demand for intensive care beds. The demand had been assumed, based on pneumonia data, to be half the actual level observed elsewhere. Earlier versions of the Imperial College model, with the errant assumption, had been informing the UK and US government policy on the virus for “weeks”.–

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: