New report accuses Times of Islamophobic “litany” fuelling “racist agenda”

Media Reform Coalition’s damning conclusions published this morning
Part of the MRC reports cover graphic

A damning new report just published by the Media Reform Coalition (MRC) in cooperation with Hacked Off and other groups accuses the Times newspaper of a ‘litany of falsehoods about Muslims’ that has fuelled racism and hate crimes.

The report, authored by leading journalist Brian Cathcart, co-founder of Hacked Off and Press Gang editor Paddy French, examines the paper’s conduct around the publication of articles targeting Muslims and concludes that the Times neglected even basic fact-checking and left out important context – and concludes that its stories amplified anti-Muslim racism and fuelled hate crimes.

It goes as far as to state that:

“Our examination of the facts leads us to conclude that the scandals Norfolk described did not occur.”

An MRC press release this morning summarises:

The report examines:

– three sensational investigations that exposed scandals and made headlines
– written by one of Britain’s leading journalists – Andrew Norfolk
– and published in one of the world’s best known newspapers – the Times.

Two experienced journalists found:

– the scandals exposed didn’t happen
– basic journalistic standards were sacrificed to create these stories.

The report accuses the Times and its Chief Investigative Reporter Andrew Norfolk of failing to meet journalistic standards including, among other failures:

  • omitting or minimising “facts that would have led readers to question central elements of what was being alleged” and
  • using quotations out of context “in ways that left them open to misinterpretation”

before concluding:

Every journalist makes mistakes, but we find it difficult to understand how a single senior reporter could have made, or been allowed to make, errors of judgement of this kind in articles of such importance and such obvious sensitivity.

The report also accuses the Times of “resisting complaints and criticisms in defiance of the evidence” and of failing to make any meaningful corrections to the “significant inaccuracies” published.

MRC chair Natalie French said:

A pattern of systematic misreporting has once again been exposed at one of Britain’s most respected newspapers. As this report attests, The Times repeatedly failed to do basic fact checking in a number of stories targeting Muslims and routinely omitted essential context. This resulted not just in a litany of falsehoods about Muslims, but served to amplify an increasingly prevalent Islamophobia and fuel an emboldened racist agenda in the context of a rise in hate crimes. This kind of reporting would be unacceptable in any publication, but it is particularly egregious given The Times’ claim to be Britain’s ‘newspaper of record’. That the newspaper has failed to respond to the allegations serves as a chilling reminder of press unaccountability. The Media Reform Coalition is today calling for The Times to launch an urgent, independent and credible investigation into its reporting on Muslims. Both its readers and the wider public deserve to know how such a blatant lapse of professional standards occurred and what will be done to prevent it happening again.

The full report can be downloaded here.

The Times and Andrew Norfolk have been asked for comment.

SKWAWKBOX view:

Hate crime – particularly anti-Muslim hate crime – continues to increase. Meanwhile, the Establishment is using accusations of fake news in order to censor independent news sources, while ignoring the avalanche of fake news from the so-called mainstream.

It is essential that the independent investigation demanded by the reports authors takes place – and does so publicly, with no aspect of its process or conclusions hidden.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here for a monthly donation via GoCardless. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

8 responses to “New report accuses Times of Islamophobic “litany” fuelling “racist agenda”

  1. There’s not many journalists out there anymore. They’re just propaganda pushers!

  2. That’s why they’re all keeping quiet about Julian Assange. They’re trashing their own profession and facilitating the criminalisation of journalism.

    They’re a fucking disgrace!

  3. There appears to be a pattern emerging here… the Times is also facing an employment tribunal over if its coverage of Transgender issues have allowed an environment of transphobia to fester.

  4. Pingback: New report accuses Times of Islamophobic “litany” fuelling “racist agenda” | The SKWAWKBOX | Tory Britain!·

  5. On a side note, to which continent are the Islamic race indigenous?

  6. I don’t read the rag but I expect it followed the rest of the MSM’s pattern of belabouring the point that Boris Johnson’s neighbour is a left wing Labour supporter.

    I don’t recall EVER seeing ANY of the “Labour antisemitism” accusers being described as “right wing supporting.”

    Freedom of speech doesn’t give the MSM the freedom deliberately to mislead the electorate.

    First order of business for the incoming Labour administration ought to be holding the MSM to the truth – possibly with a new offence such as ‘Subversion of Democracy’ – to carry penalties appropriate to the seriousness of corrupting our most important institution for personal gain.

    Where an organ is found to be systematically pushing the neoliberal world view or other politically-motivated proven falsehoods the only mitigation I can imagine for an editor would be intimidation/coercion by the owner or being misled by a lying reporter like Boris Johnson, either of whom should then face equally serious charges.
    Where individual journalists are charged the only defence can be as above or that named sources misled them.

Leave a Reply