Excl: DWP commits – no one downgraded when 1.6m #PIP claimants reassessed



Disability activists and others have raised concerns that the government will be reassessing all 1.6 million PIP (Personal Independence Payment) claimants – a process expected to take around four years to complete – as a result of Esther McVey’s concession of a court judgment that the Dept of Work and Pensions (DWP) was unfairly discriminating against claimants with mental health issues.

As not all claimants have mental health issues and some claimants are already on the maximum award and therefore cannot have been short-changed, there were fears that the reassessment might be used to downgrade the awards of some claimants, as the DWP tries to cut the cost of some claims to offset the increases that will have to be granted to others.

The SKWAWKBOX put the question directly to the DWP to ask whether the government would guarantee that nobody will have their payments reduced as a result of the reassessment – and received a frankly surprising response:

We will be screening the existing PIP caseload of 1.6m to identify the subset of people who may benefit. The vast majority of claimants will not be affected.

For the subset of people that may be affected (currently estimated at 220,000) we will undertake a detailed review of their application and award. Nobody will be downgraded as a result.

There may well be few among disability activists who are prepared to take the government at its word – but the DWP has now put itself on record in an official press response. If it does not act accordingly, the promise now can be used to hold it to account and may prove useful in potential future legal action.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


  1. Thank you for getting this in writing. I know a lot of people will be relieved when they read this, The DWP can be a devious bunch

    1. Hey Foggy, Namaste

      ‘Can be a devious bunch’ – they are a devious bunch full-stop and have done nothing to challenge policy on PIP since it was introduced in 2013, but have worked in partnership with government to restrict full awards.

      What remains to be seen is if DWP backdate awards and pay arrears from effective dates on original decisions and not from the date of re-assessment. Time will tell.

      In light of the court judgement, one wonders if those discriminated against will receive compensation for the suffering inflicted upon them. Again, time will tell.

      Namaste 🙂


  2. I wonder if they mean that nobody ‘in the 220,000 subset’ will be downgraded, leaving the rest in a place where they could *still* be downgraded?

    Or is my reading of their statement just *too* pessimistic… or overly cynical?

  3. Hey Swawkbox, Namaste,

    If medical assessment is to be made fit for purpose and inclusive for PIP claimants then why isn’t DWP also making the same commitment to ESA claimants? PIP is not paid as a primary benefit but ESA is and claimants should expect to be treated with the exact same regard when being assessed under Work Capability Assessment (WCA) as those assessed for PIP.

    Namaste 🙂


Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: