Exclusive: full wording of NEC’s motion to Haringey council

haringey cropped

Today’s Sunday Times featured a letter, allegedly signed by a number of council leaders – at least one has denied signing it – against an NEC (Labour’s National Executive Committee) motion concerning the controversial ‘HDV’ (Haringey Development Vehicle’).

As the SKWAWKBOX revealed the author of the letter, who had touted among council leaders asking them to sign it, was also the person responsible for the content of the motion – Newcastle City Council leader Nick Forbes.

Forbes had objected to the original motion, which had then been extensively amended to reflect his wishes – and not a single NEC member, including Forbes, had voted against it.

The media have featured excerpts from the motion, which they have characterised as ‘telling’ or ‘directing’ the council to ‘halt’ the HDV. But the SKWAWKBOX brings its readers the full wording of the motion:

The NEC welcomes the urgent intervention of Labour LGA representatives and the appropriate shadow cabinet members in an effort to resolve the matter amicably in consultation with all of the interested parties.

If however that approach proves to be unproductive before the next scheduled full council meeting then the NEC strongly advises that the process to agree the HDV with Lendlease is paused and that contractual arrangements are not signed prior to May’s local elections after which they should be reviewed.

No halts, nothing but advice that the proceedings should be paused until after the local elections – and that only if the various parties are unable to find ‘resolve the matter’.

As one senior Labour source told the SKWAWKBOX, Not exactly aggressive interference, is it?“.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

If you wish to reblog this post, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

3 responses to “Exclusive: full wording of NEC’s motion to Haringey council

  1. Pingback: Exclusive: full wording of NEC’s motion to Haringey council | The SKWAWKBOX | sdbast·

  2. Pingback: Lab First use party logo on anti-NEC petition: “Why would we ask permission?” | The SKWAWKBOX·

  3. I see the moderates(blairites) are out in force on Haringey and brexit.
    They keep jumping in with the same line of attack, and it’s obvious what there intentions are.
    Now the usual culprits are saying the NEC shouldn’t interfere, but put their two peneth in other peoples constituencies (Wes Streeting) and others.
    I’m not a Labour member but can see what their agenda is, so why are they getting away with it.
    It’s as if these MPs and councillors are independent the way they act, they are certainly not accountable to anyone.
    For the party to move away from its past deselections should happen.

Leave a Reply