3yo boy has seizure on train – guard there to help. For now

safer with guard

Last Friday on Merseyside – on the 16.36hrs service from West Kirby to Liverpool, to be precise – a young boy became seriously ill after suffering a seizure.

If Merseyrail’s plans to remove guards from their trains to cut costs had already been implemented, his mother – who also had his little sister to look after – would have had no assistance available except the driver. Happily, those plans have not yet been put into action and are being resisted by the RMT union.

The train guard – who had help on this occasion from a driver who was transferring on the train to another station – was able to assist the mother in making the little boy comfortable, making sure he was able to breathe as well as possible and in looking after the boy’s sister.

The ambulance – another symptom of Tory cuts – took 45 minutes to arrive.

Eyewitnesses described the events to the SKWAWKBOX:

We were on a six-car train on way back from West Kirby. A passenger went to find the guard and told him the little lad wasn’t well. As you’d imagine, the mum was very distressed at the lad having a seizure.

I’ve got kids, so you know when they’re not well – his face had gone blue and grey, he wasn’t breathing well. It was cold so he was all bundled up – he undid all his buttons and put him in the recovery position. Then he rubbed his back and kept checking on him – there was a 45-minute wait for the ambulance.

If this had been driver-only train? Well, the little lad was in the last carriage – there would have been nobody for passenger to go to in the carriages. All that makes extra time before he’d be getting any help.

When the lad came round, the ambulance crew asked the guard not to move him so they had to make him comfortable. He let him watch Peppa Pig on their phones, gave his little sister food out of his bag so she was happy. The mum was in a state, as you’d imagine – but once everything was in hand she was very grateful.

In the end, we were stopped for almost an hour.

A train driver from another affected company spoke to the SKWAWKBOX on condition of anonymity to give his perspective on such incidents:

For starters the driver’s going to be busy dealing with signalmen, if the train’s moving he’s going to have to bring it safely to a stop, make sure the signalmen are aware so everyone’s safe. These things can happen at any time across eighteen or more hours of operation and the safety of the train and all the passengers has to come first.

And these things do happen, frequently. We regularly get passengers taking ill, people on the line trying to commit suicide, other types of incident.

The driver and guard are a team and we work together – most drivers have been guards and work their way up. If I’d been the driver that day and we’d had no guard on board, it would have been a nightmare.

I dread the thought of having to deal with something like that on my own.

Passengers dread the thought too, with the vast majority of Merseyside rail travellers and those affected in other areas around the country wanting to keep guards on trains for passenger safety.

The only people who want to remove the guards are the rail companies looking to increase already substantial profits – even though they have admitted ‘DOO’ has higher risks.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.


  1. Thank heavens for the guard. It just proves that the guards on trains are necessary. Shared on FB.

  2. The aim of this Tory and also Blairite Labour governments, is to privatise all public services eventually, even LAs , although child/ adult protection effectively now privatised anyway, and 310 million private profit is made by recycling our rubbish, NHS, police, courts, prisons, probation for commercially aware monopoly venture capital backed profit.

    What that MEANS is, we get no choice, they charge what they want and the service becomes less and less and there is no accountability as all self regulating and too big to fail and when they do it is often just a case of million pound buy outs and asset stripping.

    And like our banks, mental health, child/adult protection these private monopolies concentrate not on their service but on increasing their captive customers, by harvesting and decreasing the money spent on the service by less itinerant staff, volunteers and trainees.

    Thank you for this. We live in rip off, take as much as they can, whilst you can Britain.

  3. One example of a myriad of potential life-threatening scenarios.

    Keep the guards on the trains. You make enough bleedin’ profits.

  4. The Devil’s greatest trick was to mislead the people into believing there’s a natural law that says private business is inherently more efficient than public service.
    Trains are better now than before because of technical advances, not privatisation.
    Railway management, at one time so efficient it went unnoticed, is now a national joke.
    Buying a ticket may be simple for commuters but it’s a time-consuming clickfest of comparison sites for the occasional traveller – yet ticket offices in stations have bigger queues than before privatisation.
    Station staff used to take pride in knowing the whole, much larger, network intimately but no longer.
    Public ownership with public oversight is the only way if anyone else agrees that a new golden age of rail might be a nice idea?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: