Slough investigation into council leader: no council case to answer


Suspended leader of Slough Borough Council (SBC) Sohail Munawar was suspended by the Labour Party pending the outcome of an investigation by the council’s Monitoring Officer (MO) into allegations that he circulated a ‘disturbing’ video via WhatsApp. Councillor Munawar maintains that he had received a file containing the video and a trojan or virus that sent out the video to his contacts. Unspecified allegations were also made regarding his ‘attitude and behaviour’.

The MO today issued provisional findings resulting from the investigation – concluding that Cllr Sohail has no case to answer as regards the council:

slough .png

The findings are a qualified exoneration, as they specify that no offence was committed in regard to Cllr Munawar’s activities or status as a councillor – but they imply that the Labour Party should have conducted its own investigation, which appears not to have happened.

The situation in Slough Labour group appears to be complicated and opaque, with accusation and counter-accusation. It is further muddied by the fact that another senior councillor, who faced specific allegations of potentially sexist and racist bullying and discrimination was apparently not suspended, in spite of the severity of the allegations, which cover a period of time:

slough alleg.png

This councillor’s opponents in the Labour group maintain that he has not been suspended because of his closeness with certain personnel at a regional level within the party. In spite of assurances by email, seen by the SKWAWKBOX, that the matter would be investigated, there appears to have been little or no progress.

Given the immediate suspension of Cllr Munawar – and the swift suspension of Labour MPs and Assembly members for what appear to be lesser allegations – the fact that no similar action was taken against one particular councillor is at the least puzzling.

Council leader Munawar faces a confidence vote in his leadership, over unrelated concerns, at the next meeting of SBC, which takes place 28 November. However, in view of the outcome of the Slough MO’s investigation his supporters believe that he should immediately be reinstated to the party and as council leader pending the result of the confidence vote.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.


  1. Extra thick white wash at sleazy Slough Council.

    Monitoring Office Linda Walker should NOT be giving any personal verdicts when the council’s official investigation has NOT YET formally started.

  2. Sadly you have been fed only part of the story about Slough Labour. You may want to ask a few more questions about the treatment of the Deputy Leader Sabia Hussain by the suspended leader and chief executive.

    Bullying and harassment especially of young women Labour councillors should not be condoned or ignored by skwakbox.

    1. Why would you think we haven’t spoken to Cllr Hussain? If you think the article is condoning anything or supporting anyone, you haven’t read carefully enough. It’s reporting facts that can be fully established – and those that can’t be, or in which right/wrong are debatable, haven’t been included until they can be clarified

      1. If all the facts can’t be clarified why publish at all! You are doing yourself a disservice by getting involved in an internal party dispute

        And perhaps you can clarify if you did speak to Cllr Hussain!

      2. By your silence I assume you did not speak to Cllr Hussain to get her side of your ‘story’

        If there is a morale here it is that you should not be used by factions in internal party politics. Is it one you will ever learn?

      3. What silence? Speaking to someone doesn’t mean what they say is suitable for the article – but it might *prevent* things being in the article or changing the way it’s written. You’re barking up the wrong tree here

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: