Birkenhead result ‘mixed but seismic’- and controversy as MP counts votes

bhead town hall

As the SKWAWKBOX revealed last night, Friday evening was an important day for Labour on Merseyside, as Birkenhead CLP (constituency Labour party) held its AGM with a strong slate of left-wing candidates standing for the CLP’s ‘exec’.

Results are in – and were a ‘mixed bag’ but still a strong performance by the left, who didn’t win Chair or vice-Chair but did manage to win a majority on the executive committee, including the vice-Chair membership.

Local members describe this as a ‘huge shock’ and a ‘shot across the bows’ for the right-wing old guard that has held sway for so long.

The evening did not pass without controversy, however. The Birkenhead constituency is represented in Parliament by veteran MP Frank Field, who is well to the right of the party. At every CLP vote, tellers are appointed to oversee the count and ensure everything is carried out properly – so it’s important that tellers are perceived to be neutral.

Frank Field, the MP, was one of the tellers – as far as the SKWAWKBOX can ascertain, no Labour MP has acted as a teller before.

This caused consternation among members and the regional Labour regional representative at the meeting reportedly told members that if they decided to put a complaint in about the MP teller, he would have to uphold it. As yet, no decision on a complaint is known to have been made.

While ‘mixed bag’ is probably the best summary of the night, local left members are elated at results that, seen in the context of Birkenhead politics, can justly be described as seismic.

The SKWAWKBOX needs your support. This blog is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your solidarity so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.


  1. Shows how insidious and all important the game is.

    And the game, I ANY EVENT, is only to allow members to be actually represented which all should want if the Labour Party membership is to revert to democracy.

  2. Wouldn’t go as far as ‘seismic’ skwawky. As I said in the other thread, I didn’t have much confidence in them; and none of the two top specs were taken, nor was a majority gained…

    But it’s a start, I guess. Although I’ll place me bottom one on field being the candidate come the next election.

    Jeggsy Dodd sums the place up eloquently…

  3. Oops! Read the OP wrong…Majority WAS gained (On the vice-chair membership)

    My bad!

  4. My instinct looking at all this exciting stuff, is that the left can get as excited as they like about taking over committees etc. What does that gain them, having their own approval. It is having a candidate the general public like and trust that matters. They choose who represents them in Parliament. The excitable hard left can attack tried and trusted MPs if that makes them feel important. I don’t see them putting up someone we the people prefer to FField or A Eagle next door. They just don’t get that, do they.

    1. The people like Corbyn and anyone in tune with him. Others ride on his coat-tails and claim a mandate. It’s not rocket-science

Leave a Reply