Boundary changes big sticking point in Tory/#DUP deal – and major risk to peace

Sources in Northern Ireland have told the SKWAWKBOX that the main factor holding up a deal between the Tories and the DUP is the issue of boundary changes.

foster may.png

The Tories want – but may not be able – to push through boundary changes in the UK in a move that will essentially give them a boost of ten seats, with many commentators recognising this as little more than a naked attempt to gerrymander our political system in their favour.

However, the different contours of the political landscape in Northern Ireland mean that, while the DUP may agree with the Tories on issues of social conservatism, they are dead-set against the boundary changes that will cost them three seats. By contrast, Sinn Fein would favour changes that would reduce a loyalist advantage.

DUP sources have been withering about the Tories’ negotiating skills – which hardly bodes well for the Brexit deal, let alone for Northern Ireland:

bienkov NI.png

Theresa May and her party are on the horns of a huge dilemma. If she refuses, she loses her deal.

But if she concedes the boundary changes, she will be throwing away the Tory ambition to rig our democracy in their favour to the fury of her hardline backbenchers and will be seen as weak by a DUP that won’t hesitate to turn the screw to its advantage now and in future.

But far worse, it will be considered by nationalists in Northern Ireland as a return to gerrymandering – a key cause of the Troubles and a possible trigger for their resumption.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers. If you found this information helpful and can afford to, please do click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.


  1. Whatever the implications of boundary changes on the DUP / Conservative talks, I would be interested to see the source of your conclusion that the Conservatives would get a boost of 10 seats with their “gerrymandering” ( which actually proposes to make (with a couple of exceptions) all constituencies have between 71k and 79k voters).

    I’m far too lazy to do the work myself, but I’ve come across this


    which shows that the changes vs the actual 2017 election result would result in Cons losing 20 seats and Lab losing 17. (In %age terms Cons -6.3%; Lab – 6.5%)

    Oddly this analysis does agree with the DUP losing 3 (and SF gaining 2 making SF the largest NI party in Westminster)

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: