#Copeland, #Tories care SO little for your #NHS they can’t even be bothered to pretend

You kind of expect a Tory politician to be arrogant. That – along with a colluding media machine – is probably why they often get away with it. But there are times even they can surprise you with the sheer scale of their hubris.

The Tories are fighting two by-elections this week. In Stoke, they don’t seem to be making much effort and seem to be happy to stand back and leave their UKIP surrogates a clear field to try – and, it looks like, fail – to beat Labour.

But in the Cumbrian seat of Copeland, they claim to be the main threat to a Labour hold – and the key battleground is the NHS, an issue on which even the most anti-Labour media concede that Labour holds the high ground.

The reason it’s the key battleground is that there have been reports for ages that Copeland’s local hospital, North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, faces severe downgrading including the loss of maternity services and its accident and emergency department – and of a major portion of its beds.

So surely any serious party with even a modicum of respect for the people it hopes will vote for them would be doing its level best to allay those fears – or, even at the most cynical extreme, at least pretend to be taking the concerns of the local people seriously until after the election.

You’d think.

But the Tories apparently hold the people of Copeland in such complete contempt that they can’t be bothered to go to the effort of making a show of caring.

Not even when all it would involve is opening a door.

The national media has ignored it, but a Cumbrian MP and local hospital campaigner were ‘not allowed’ to hand in a petition with 40,000 signatures calling for the hospital’s services to be saved – after having been told that they could:

express and star.png

Workington MP Sue Hayman had an appointment to hand in the petition today at 4pm. But when they arrived at Downing Street, they were refused entry and told to come back ‘after Thursday’.

After the votes are counted, in other words.

Clearly Theresa May – who can be seen below refusing four times to give any assurances about services at the hospital – wanted to avoid an uncomfortable photocall with a petition showing how deeply people care about their hospital and their NHS.

But it takes a special level of arrogant contempt to think that letting them turn up and refusing even to open the door to them would play any better.

That arrogance says that Theresa May considers the people of Copeland too stupid or too apathetic to punish her and her party at the ballot box.

This blog believes that Cumbrian people are far too sensible, perceptive and passionate about their NHS to fall for such nonsense – or to fail to see that only the Labour Party that created the NHS can be trusted with it.

Please make sure the Tories are sent a message accordingly on Thursday. Loud and clear.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

4 responses to “#Copeland, #Tories care SO little for your #NHS they can’t even be bothered to pretend

  1. actually I’d heard – I think on BBC News channel last night – that Theresa May went to Stoke yday as they think they’re in with more of a chance now, with UKIP collapsing. Which hopefully will split the vote and help Labour?

    jan parker

    (t) 01766 771 801 (m) 07909 643 221

    *visit janparker.co.uk * for workshops, retreats, classes on death awareness, energy medicine, second half of life, & meditation

    Like

  2. Pingback: #Copeland, #Tories care SO little for your #NHS they can’t even be bothered to pretend | paulh121·

  3. Hi Stephen
    Using our material once again, I sent this to the Guardian today.
    Thanks, as always.
    John

    Thank you for printing the incisive letters by David Rosenberg and Cathy Devine (Is Corbyn responsible for all Labour’s troubles? 22 February). Positive coverage does seem to be the preserve of the letters page. Devine rightly calls Joan Smith’s intemperate opinion piece the day before “irresponsible”. And when it comes to writing about Corbyn responsible journalism is in short supply. Ed Vulliamy, in your sister paper on Sunday, wrote “Corbyn and his MPs want to appease xenophobia in Labour heartlands, at whatever price, to keep their seats warm at Westminster”. Such contempt for the electorate and the elected is irresponsible and not worthy of a usually credible journalist. Does your news coverage fare better? Well, no one on the left would lose sleep over being told that Mandelson doesn’t like Corbyn (‘I work every single day to oust Corbyn’ – Mandelson, same day). It’s scarcely news, though perhaps helpful in making absolutely clear what Corby is up against. However the only other Lords quoted were those who “expressed fury about the leadership’s position on leaving the EU”. We had to wait to read your editorial before learning that Lord Kerr “sagely argued” for “three ways that parliamentary democracy could invigorate the process” of avoiding a disastrous Brexit. You don’t think Corbyn and his advisers have worked this out? “The fight starts here” was mocked when Corbyn said it, but as amendment after amendment is rejected by the government the awfulness of what Brexit really means will become apparent and May’s slender majority may look less than invincible.
    The report on the Lords’ debate concludes with “some Labour MPs said that the Tory campaigns in both seats had been growing in confidence”. Maybe, but there is news you did not cover which could be relevant to the Copeland election. A Cumbrian MP and a local hospital campaigner had a 4pm appointment to deliver a petition to Downing Street with 40,000 signatures calling for the local hospital’s services to be saved. They arrived and were were turned away, told to come back “after Thursday”. That would avoid an embarrassing photocell just before the election. Wouldn’t it be responsible journalism to have covered that story?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s