Did Jeremy Hunt commit perjury to ‘win’ Junior Docs court case?

ctyb4osxeae_0wl

Last month, Secretary of State for Health Jeremy Hunt claimed to have won the Dept of Health (DH)’s court case against ‘junior doctors’ (who are actually any doctor below consultant level).

A group of doctors had brought the case against Hunt’s planned imposition of a new contract which, in spite of government double-speak, will overstretch them even further for less pay and present a danger to patients. It’s clear to anyone that this plan is just the next step in impoverishing our NHS and its staff in order to eventually end it as a national provision, ‘free at the point of need’.

The DH ‘won’ the case by claiming they’re not planning to ‘impose’ the new contract, but are simply recommending it – in spite of Hunt telling the House of Commons on more than one occasion that he would.

Hunt’s apparent backtracking meant that the DH’s ‘win’ was more like a win for the doctors. However, evidence has emerged that the Health Secretary may have perjured himself (or had others do it for him) in order to win the case.

Last week, at least one NHS trusts sent emails to their ‘junior’ doctors about their contracts. The emails contained the following threat:

jdocs

Firing someone for not signing is bad enough. Adding the threat that their training will be ended and the time already spent training will be invalidated is the worst kind of coercion.

If it looks like imposition, walks like imposition and quacks like imposition, it’s not ‘recommending’. And delegating the dirty work doesn’t absolve Jeremy Hunt for misleading a court in order to win a case brought justly against you.

The police must immediately begin an investigation into Hunt’s apparent perjury – and prosecute him to the full extent of the law if they find any evidence that Hunt’s ‘recommendation’ has been a de facto imposition.

Share this to raise awareness and build pressure, so they can’t avoid their duty.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn should also hammer the government on this at the next PMQs and Shadow Health Secretary Diane Abbott should do the same at the next health questions.

Advertisements

10 responses to “Did Jeremy Hunt commit perjury to ‘win’ Junior Docs court case?

  1. Pingback: Did Jeremy Hunt commit perjury to ‘win’ Junior Docs court case? | The SKWAWKBOX Blog | Vox Political·

  2. Challenge any dismissals based on the contents of the email – from a contract law perspective the phrasing of this paragraph looks highly suspect! The best way would be on a case by case basis rather than a class action. It would be interesting to see how many will respond by refusing to sign (and well within their rights to!)

    Like

  3. Would Jerry Hunt shadows a junior doctor ie registrar for two weeks including weekends to see what they do. Not only their job but supporting their juniors.

    Like

  4. Reblogged this on | truthaholics and commented:
    “The police must immediately begin an investigation into Hunt’s apparent perjury – and prosecute him to the full extent of the law if they find any evidence that Hunt’s ‘recommendation’ has been a de facto imposition.

    Share this to raise awareness and build pressure, so they can’t avoid their duty.

    Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn should also hammer the government on this at the next PMQs and Shadow Health Secretary Diane Abbott should do the same at the next health questions.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s