Judge ruled Poppy Gustafsson’s attempts to explain her role at ‘improper accounting’ firm ‘unconvincing’

Keir Starmer has appointed newly-ennobled ‘entrepreneur’ Poppy Gustafsson to the Labour front bench as ‘Minister for Investment’. But Gustafsson’s history has been highlighted and questioned by Private Eye – with the tongue-in-cheek comment that “others may wonder if she is less an entrepreneur who knows about growing business and more a practitioner of the less economically productive dark arts of creative accounting“.
Announcing the new role, Starmer called Gustafson ‘an accomplished entrepreneur who brings invaluable experience to the role’ of bringing investment into the UK – but neglected to mention that she is also closely linked to a notorious corporate scandal that left one colleague in prison in the US and another ruled by the UK High Court to have acted fraudulently.
Gustafsson’s CEO role at cybersecurity firm Darktrace was mentioned by Starmer, but not that Mike Lynch, the owner of the firm, knew her before that role because she was ‘European Financial Controller’ at another of his firms, ‘Autonomy’, which he then sold to Hewlett Packard.
But Lynch was found by the High Court to have acted fraudulently to inflate the perceived value of the business before the sale, while his finance director Sushovan Hussain ended up in jail in the US for the fraud. The High Court judgment reveals that Gustafsson was involved in transactions linked to the fraud. The fraud included an ongoing ‘ruse’ that involved creating fake sales value by selling stuff and software services to customers who would get the premium prices discounted later, building misleading sales figures and making the firm look more profitable than it was.
High Court judge Mr Justice Hildyard said of this dishonest practice that its
purpose was to cover shortfalls in software revenues and perpetuate the appearance of meeting revenue forecasts, [so] their true nature was being concealed and their effect on Autonomy’s trading performance was being disguised.
He found that Gustafsson was ‘aware of the hardware reselling strategy’ and that her attempt to excuse her role in the selling of software packages – she had admitted she had ‘literally no idea’ what she was selling – that were of little or no use to clients was ‘not convincing’.
It certainly didn’t change the metrics I was putting in… I have no idea of what any of [the listed products] is… what’s a kick-start metadata? I have literally no idea.
Poppy Gustafsson at the High Court.
the only rational explanation for Ms Gustafsson being tasked with putting together the software offering was that it was primarily driven by accounting considerations…her attempt to explain her role was not convincing.
High Court judge Mr Justice Hildyard.
Hildyard found the firm guilty of ‘improper accounting and misstatement of recognised revenue’ and a ‘breach of duty and improper use of power’.
Keir Starmer’s team is no stranger to the use of a little creative accounting, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s description of large donations for designer clothes, in her official declaration of interests, as ‘office support’. Deputy PM Angela Rayner accepted similar donations and declared them as a ‘donation in kind for undertaking parliamentary duties’ and as ‘support’ for her ‘capacity as deputy leader of the Labour Party’.
Ms Reeves has also been accused of making up her employment history, claiming she was an economist for Lloyds Bank while a former boss said she was in reality a ‘complaints support manager’.
SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount as it has to be entered by us). Alternatively, if you prefer to make a one-off or recurring donation by simple card payment, please use the form below:
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyThanks for your solidarity so Skwawkbox can keep doing its job of inconveniencing the right and helping to build the left!
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


Another one who doesn’t now her way
The red half is just as corrupt as the blue half of the Uniparty.
Well that’s me shocked
…Said nobody, ever.
Ffs they’re desperately trying to shoehorn mandelslime into as senior a position as possible.
Mandelslime. With THAT record.
Let that sink in, and then realise this appointment is small beer, although dodgy as f**k in itself.
And STILL the link I want to post – which includes mamdelslime – won’t post.
Talk about a plastic smile!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fw_ib7JhsU
BLACK UHURU -PLASTIC SMILE
I’ll try this…
https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2025/01/ivor-caplin-hello-bbc.html?m=1#comment-form
Look for my comment in the comments section (after reading the article, of course) and click on The link I provided.
Interesting. I copied and pasted that comment from zelo street as a reply yesterday, and it has not appeared.
Lets try that comment without the link.
“A lot of noise recently about Muslim grooming gangs, but strangely, no mention of the inextricable link between friends of israel and paedophilia…”
You are right, Toffee. Something does not want that link to appear anywhere in any form.
One more attempt: Let’s try splitting it up in another form by replacing some of that URL in longhand:
https:
forward slash forward slash
google
dash
law
dot
blogspot
dot
com
forward slash
2019
forward slash
07
forward slash
epstein
dash
shows
dash
how
dash
israel
dash
runs
dash
child
dot
html
question mark
m
equals sign
1#
——————————————————————–
Let see if that works?
Bingo. There’s always a work around.
Thanks Dave.
For everyone else, I strongly recommend you take the time to to both type it out manually, and then read it.
Or you could put the drama to one side for a moment and simply click on this link
https://google-law.blogspot.com/2019/07/epstein-shows-how-israel-runs-child.html?m=1#
On another note – siddiq has spewed it.
Keef says there was no evidence of financial impropriety and no breach of the ministerial code – although we dont know how hard laurie magnus looked, or what evidence siddiq did or didn’t provide.
So….One dodgy (dis)appointmemt out (for now), one in.