Veteran activist Anne Belworthy on the most dictatorial leader in the history of the Labour party and his yes-men and women

Originally published on Whitstable Views.
I have just had a little spat with Neil Fisher, who is an administrator for the Canterbury Residents Facebook group that allows political comments. I had posted a statement from Ben Sellers and added a comment saying that Keir Starmer is the most dictatorial leader in the history of the Labour Party. I said that before him, you were allowed to express an opinion without being thrown out of the party on false accusations or, in the case of Labour MPs, expressing a view.
Members are now afraid to express any support for Gaza or make criticism of the Israeli government’s cruelty and oppression for fear of being accused of anti-semitism and being thrown out of the party — as I was.
The party at all levels is run by yes-men and -women afraid to express views that aren’t those of the leader. Labour MPs toe the Starmer line rigidly, afraid of losing the Labour whip and then being unable to stand at the next election as a Labour MP. Local parties have been denied the democratic right, in many cases, to select the MP of their choice and have instead seen a candidate foisted on them that is acceptable to the leadership. Hence the Labour benches now are full of Starmer think-alikes or MPs holding their tongue. Free speech is reduced dramatically.
Neil Fisher replied: That’s not different, that’s how it’s always been done. For example, Corbyn removed the whip from 21 MPs, and over 100 candidates were centrally imposed during his tenure.
This is not true. Candidates were replaced in a few cases during Corbyn’s time — not because of which type of politics they flew under but for various other reasons. I certainly know that Hilary Benn had the whip removed for a time as leader of the revolt in the Parliamentary party against Corbyn that came to be known as the Chicken Coup. But anyway, like all good Centrists, Neil straight away has to focus on any Corbyn misdemeanors, true or not. Certainly the whip has been removed by previous leaders but restored before the election.
A good example of how Starmer has chosen to rid himself of left-wing members of the party was the case of Sam Tarry, MP for Ilford South and shadow transport minister. He lost the whip for daring to stand on an RMT picket line. He had been part of Corbyn’s campaign team when Corbyn was selected as Labour leader in September 2015. Having got rid of the only other left-wing shadow cabinet member, Rebecca Long Bailey, clearly Sam had to go.
At the general election in 2024, Sam was replaced by the leader of Redbridge Council, Jas Athwal — a leadership chosen candidate, since exposed as something of a slum landlord, whose 15 rented flats are in a disgusting condition. BUT his politics are right: never mind that his candidature was never questioned.
The Chicken Coup
Among those who resigned were Ian Murray, Diana Johnson, Toby Perkins, Anna Turley, Stephen Kinnock and Chris Bryant.
The Chicken Coup of 2016 was one of the most disgraceful moves made by the right-wing MPs to get rid of Corbyn and replace him with someone quite different.
The weekend after Britain voted to leave the EU, the Tory government was in absolute turmoil. David Cameron resigned as prime minister and clearly positive moves were needed from Labour to begin to lead the country’s recovery from what had been a tumultuous referendum, in which bogus promises had been made by Boris Johnson if Brexit were to be achieved.
But that weekend is when the shadow cabinet decided to strike, with its rightwingers making a coordinated show of their resignations from it on TV. They completely disregarded the wishes of the membership, which had swelled with Corbyn’s leadership, and tried from then on to inflict as much damage as they could on the members’ democratically elected leader.
However, Corbyn refilled his cabinet with MPs who were anti-austerity, anti-corporate power, supported a public health service and recognised the climate emergency.
The 2017 general election was amazing for Labour. It was in April that the election was called. Tory prime minister Theresa May had a large majority while Labour, in Parliament and outside, was trying to recover from the damage done by the Chicken Coup and was low in the opinion polls.
At grass-roots level we learnt much later that the Labour Party establishment — with guidance from general secretary Iain McNichol, now a lord thanks to Keir Starmer — was running a subversive sabotage campaign to thwart Corbyn by starving marginal seats of cash, instead diverting resources to rightwingers such as Yvette Cooper, Rachel Reeves and many others, and deliberately failing to carry out campaign planning orders. Nevertheless, Corbyn’s campaign went well and the public meetings that he held overflowed onto the streets — in many cases, loudspeakers had to relay his words to enthusiastic listeners outside.
When I pointed out in Corbyn’s defence that the 2017 election was almost won — Labour got 41 per cent of the vote, the highest share of the vote since Clement Attlee in 1945 — to Neil on the Facebook page, he made the point, quite rightly, that it was irrelevant because we didn’t win.
But if Corbyn’s Labour had been allowed to continue without the huge distraction of leading MPs and the party back room running a subversive campaign, it could have been successful. Theresa May’s huge majority was lost and she had to go begging to the right-wing Unionist party for their votes in order to stay in power. But her leadership was doomed anyway because in no way could she manage to overcome the huge divisions that arose in negotiating a deal with the EU.
The long haul
Keir Starmer goes rogue at the Labour Party conference in 2018, refusing to rule out a new Remain vote: a pledge he has since gone back on
And so the long haul began toward the 2019 election, and that is the period when Starmer began to really pave his way toward his Labour leadership.
The slow inevitability of the 2019 election loss began in Liverpool when Sir Keir, as shadow Brexit secretary, took to the rostrum at the Labour conference 2018 and raised the possibility of a second referendum. And although the very naive conference delegates supported it, I was there, and my heart sank.
This clearly went against agreed shadow cabinet policy. At the 2017 election all Labour MPs had been elected under the manifesto that Labour would negotiate to keep us as close as possible to our EU neighbours and to protect jobs and the rights previously granted by the EU — but to recognise the referendum result.
This was still cabinet policy when Sir Keir took the decision to raise the possibility of a second referendum without telling a soul he was going to do it and not even putting the line on the autocue.
He broke from collective responsibility. Perhaps it was an indicator of how, as leader, without a blink he would throw out the promises that he made to the membership to secure their vote and thereafter to ruthlessly pursue right-wing austerity policies without agreement except from Rachel Reeves.
From then on in 2019, Labour lost its way with the muddled and ill-thought-out procedure that would be implemented in order to facilitate a second referendum. It resulted in a complete collapse of the Labour Red Wall, where voters had overwhelmingly supported Brexit; and Boris Johnson became prime minister: something else for me to thank the dear knight of the realm for.
Neil Fisher quite likes Keir Starmer, but he recognises that I don’t. I don’t trust Starmer. In my view he has destroyed the Labour Party I loved and worked for for so many years.
I do believe the present party is run on fear. I have noticed that long-term friends still in the party are afraid to give a tick of support for political stuff I may put on FB. It’s in fear that, in supporting an expelled member, they too will have the heavy hand of injustice placed on their shoulder and out they will go.
No way are you allowed to agree with a member that is expelled or disagrees with the beloved leader. Pretty awful, I think.

About Anne Belworthy:
Anne Belworthy was clerical union branch secretary in BT for twenty-one years and secretary to the joint negotiating committee for eight trade unions in the Canterbury, Dover and Medway areas. On retirement she was chair of Canterbury & District Pensioners Forum. Born and lived in Canterbury until retirement and now lives in Herne Bay.
SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount as it has to be entered by us). Alternatively, if you prefer to make a one-off or recurring donation by simple card payment, please use the form below:
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
Your support is hugely appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyThanks for your solidarity so Skwawkbox can keep doing its job of inconveniencing the right and helping to build the left!
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.


“….anyway, like all good Centrists, Neil straight away has to focus on any Corbyn misdemeanors…”
So so true. I would be a rich woman if I had a £1 for every time someone said “but but Corbyn” when I have criticised Starmer, rather than engage in a discussion about ‘The Dictator’ !
To be expelled by Starmer is truly a badge of honour.
Thank you for this article Ann, which is also a useful jog to my memory which sometimes fails me!
dont know much nor anything about ROSIE DUFFIELD, Canterbury but i hear she has RESIGNED from the sordid freebie scrounging SIR STARMER (Keith) KID STARVING gang.
🪱☢️🩸🪱☢️🩸🪱☢️🩸
Duffield is SCATHING in her resignation letter; citing “NEPOTISM” amongst other deplorable traits of the Establishment tool’s regime.
Surely this must be a RECORD re SWIFTEST resignation from a new government in several decades.
She says “there are others in the…” PARASITISED “party” who feel the same way.
🪱☢️🩸🪱☢️🩸🪱☢️🩸
“SLEEZE” ‼️
“AVARICE“ ‼️‼️
NEPOTISM ‼️‼️‼️
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3vkdy997rko
“”I cannot put into words how angry I and my colleagues are at your total lack of understanding about how you have made us all appear.”
She added: “The sleaze, nepotism and apparent avarice are off the scale. I am so ashamed of what you and your inner circle have done to tarnish and humiliate our once proud party.”
She wrote: “Someone with far-above-average wealth choosing to keep the Conservatives’ two-child limit to benefit payments which entrenches children in poverty, while inexplicably accepting expensive personal gifts of designer suits and glasses costing more than most of those people can grasp – this is entirely undeserving of holding the title of Labour prime minister.”
How many more resignations by Christmas?
I would be a rich woman if I had a £1 for every time someone said “but but Corbyn” when I have criticised Starmer
Perhaps that’s how you could retire to the Caribbean…
“Retire”?
Is that what they are calling it these days.?….
ROSIE DUFFIELD – has RESIGNED from VILE scrounging SIR STARMER (Keith)’s outfit.
Starmer of the 1% highest earnings has greedily snatched MORE freebies than ALL other PM’s combined, for an equal duration of time‼️‼️‼️
GREEDILY snatching EVEN more freebies than even the avaricious warmonger Blair creature.
Starmer sir, withdraws WHIP from those who oppose keeping the Two Child Cap which yokes innocent children with POVERTY.
WHAT SORT OF PERSON DOES THAT⁉️⁉️⁉️
Starmer sir Keith, hounds for THOUSANDS upon thousands of £££ handouts; suits, glasses, dresses, gowns, stays in multimillion apartments, luxury corporate lounges and boxes from MILLIONAIRES.
While, sir despises those against withdrawing Winter Heating Assistance for MILLIONS of pensioners who miss out on help because of a ONE POUND over the cut off. 🪰⚠️🪱🪰⚠️🪱🪰⚠️🪱
Duffield is SCATHING in her resignation letter; citing “NEPOTISM” amongst other deplorable traits of the Establishment tool’s regime.
Surely this must be a RECORD re SWIFTEST resignation from a new government in several decades.
EASILY Predictable and PREDICTED right here on SKWAWKBOX.ORG at least three years ago.
QUESTION:
What type responds to anyone asking a question:
I DONT have to ANSWER to the LIKES OF YOU
⚠️‼️⚠️‼️⚠️‼️
Hahaha!!! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Proper roared at that!! Nice one👍😄
SNW, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
There’s a time bomb going off right now in Europe. And just because the UK is no longer in the UK does not mean we are immune or that our position is not just as precarious.
As Lucas Leiroz over at the Strategic Culture foundation notes…..
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/09/28/famine-in-europe-the-real-goal-of-anti-russian-policies/
….there are longer term effects for Europe of the current Western sponsored and induced proxy conflict in Ukraine beyond the loss of cheap, reliable energy, deindustrialisation and the blowback from ineffective sanctions:
“Ukrainian food products have simply invaded the European market and are driving thousands of farmers out of business. Despite the protests and political pressure, no EU decision-maker seems interested in changing this tragic scenario. However, the crisis seems to have even deeper dimensions and could be a real time bomb for the entire European society….
….Selling grain, meat, dairy products and everything that is produced in the countryside seems to be no longer an attractive business in Europe. Since 2022, protests for change have been taking place in all parts of the European continent. From Poland to France, no European farmer is happy to see his products being replaced on the market by massive quantities of cheap Ukrainian agricultural items.
This is due to the irrational decision of European decision-makers to ban all import tariffs on Ukrainian food products. The measure is allegedly intended to boost the Ukrainian economy during the crisis caused by the conflict with Russia – which ironically is sponsored by the West itself. In the current European market, it is cheaper to import Ukrainian food than to resell the native products, which is obviously causing thousands of farmers to abandon their businesses.
As well known, most of Europe does not have a very strong agricultural sector, with local farmers relying on government aid to stay active in the market. Without this aid and with the invasion of Ukrainian products, it is simply no longer profitable to be part of European agribusiness, which is why thousands of people are likely to stop working in the rural areas and join the growing class of the European “precariat”.
At first, some analysts may see this scenario as a mere market shift, replacing European production with Ukrainian production. However, this analysis is limited. Despite having some of the most fertile soils in the world, Ukraine is currently a target of Western financial predators, who demand the handover of arable land as a means of payment for NATO’s billion-dollar aid packages. Organizations such as Blackrock and other funds will soon own almost all that is left of Ukraine’s “black soil.” And then Ukrainian agricultural production will depend on the willingness of the “financial sharks” to feed the Europeans….
…..The US-EU alliance is a real time bomb and in the long run it will lead Europe to famine. Already in the process of deindustrialization, energy crisis and [now] destroying its entire food security architecture, Europe faces one of the bleakest futures in human history. And almost all European decision-makers seem happy with this scenario.”
——————————————–
The “price worth paying” of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children some thirty years ago, along with Palestinian and Lebanese children today, will at some point in the not too distant future switch to be visited on the European continent as the parasitic corporate predators from across the Atlantic and their comprador’s in Europe take their pound of flesh by force. Despite not being in the EU the UK’s geographical location is equally precarious.
At the present rate – unless there are a lot more Rosie Duffield’s on the benches of the nominal comprador Starmer Government – the only “Change” Herr Starmer and his Junta are likely to achieve is changing live voters into dead voters. Either through inducing nuclear war because the Oligarch toddlers running this shit show want the resources of the Eurasian landmass to continue their Ponzi scheme or enforced famine for the benefit of the minority of the sociopaths running the private equity hedge funds on Wall Street and the City of London.
“And just because the UK is no longer in the UK” should read “And just because the UK is no longer in the EU.”
RE: Duffield…
“The sleaze, nepotism and apparent avarice are off the scale. I am so ashamed of what you and your inner circle have done to tarnish and humiliate our once proud party
https://y.yarn.co/9c39e673-9c48-4448-9c0b-dbc20bbcdcb7_text.gif
First of all, Theresa May did not have a big majority and that is one of the reasons that she called an election.
As for the ‘chicken coup’, it is worth recalling that a number of Labour MPs did not join it but only by the timely intervention of someone who had discovered in advance what was going to happen.
During the 2017 general election, Corbyn did inspire people but we should not forget also the poor campaign by Theresa May and also the Liberal Democrats.
As for Starmer, his appointment to the shadow cabinet was very badly handled. This put him into the position of being able to do for Corbyn what General Alexander Haig did for President Nixon.
During the 2019 general election campaign, there was that awful gaffe by Jonathan Ashworth which occurred when the opinion polls suggested that Labour was closing the gap and Boris Johnson had been found in a fridge.