Analysis

Starmer’s net public approval falls 24 points in one month

The more people see of the robotic Starver and his appalling decisions, the less they like

Keir Starmer’s office is reeling at the news that his net approval rating has fallen by a massive 24 points in a single month, according to a new Opinium poll. The number of people fooled into approving of him fell by six points, while those disapproving rocketed by a huge 18 points.

As Skwawkbox has always observed, the more people see of Starmer, the less they like him. He was ushered into Downing Street by the far-right Reform ‘party’, despite receiving a far lower number of votes than his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 and 2019 – and it’s all been downhill from there.

Small wonder, when his first acts in office have included suspending MPs for voting against starving children, hiding data on how many poor benefit claimants the Tories killed, continuing to support genocidal Israel, increasing the surveillance state, banning MPs from attending anti-fascist demonstrations, attacking our civil freedoms, binning the Leveson inquiry that was supposed to bring rogue papers to heel and condemning pensioners to freeze in winter.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£3.00
£5.00
£10.00
£50.00
£75.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

Your support is hugely appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.

6 comments

  1. Remember during lockdown when keef bemoaned that people hadn’t got to see the real him?

    And this has happened despite a fawningly sycophantic MSM,

    Dunno how long this article’s been up, but had this been pre-election, the former resident gobshite’d would’ve been on his fourth or fifth post be now, with at least three of them involving a corbyn comparison.

    Either the paymasters have dumped their volunteer imbecile, or it’s an obvious case of buyers regret and the penny’s dropped..

    Anywho, fuck him, and everyone claiming to have a modicum political savvy, voted smarmerism, and fuck smarmer himself.

    We’re lumbered with the total prick because of them.

  2. Labour could face a wipe out even worse that the one that the Tories just had, they deserve it.

    1. I suppose that’s kind-of what 2010 was Chris. Thing is, people are beginning to see that Starmer is worse than warmed-up Blairism – and It doesn’t take as long to piss people off when the pisser in question is a gormless, charmless, child-starver.

      You might be right: Starmer will be a spent-penny by 2029, detested by most and distrusted by more.

      1. Unfortunately, whether its Starmer at the helm or the replacement in waiting, the cowardly thug Streeting, by 2029 so much damage will have been done that the Country won’t be worth living in for the vast majority for whom there is no escape.

  3. One very obvious way to reduce Starmer’s power would be to target for defeat anyone who sought to replace an MP who was dumped by him.

    The 2 London councillors who sought to replace Jeremy Corbyn recently, plus the councillor who replaced Faiza Shaheen as Labour’s candidate in Chingford and Woodford Green, would be the first ones.

    The next London borough elections are in 2026. If they were defeated then it could act as a clear warning to others.

    The Green Party has a good chance of defeating Labour in Brighton Kemptown at the next general election where Labour’s incumbent MP was suddenly dumped just before the election and replaced by a Starmer supporter.

  4. One month in and The Official Narrative (TON) of the establishment oligarchy and its latest bought and paid for set on incompetent numpties is already looking threadbare.

    If only we had a culture:

    https://aurelien2022.substack.com/p/what-can-you-do-when-you-dont-have

    “The Party [note: along with its sycophantic LINO cheerleaders] cannot sensibly answer the simple question, What are you in power for? But then, like Orwell’s Party, it is in power to be in power….

    …The Positivist belief that society could be studied and managed according to rules analogous to those of physics and chemistry has itself degenerated into rule by spreadsheet. Our masters, perhaps unconsciously channeling Pythagoras, have decided that only numbers are real, and that if the experience of ordinary people contradicts the numbers, then that experience must be false and can be disregarded….

    ……Large parts of western electorates assume as a matter of course now that the government is lying to them, and as for the media, that beacon of truth and rectitude, well, in most countries journalists are about as trusted as second-hand car salesmen*…

    ….the spectrum of opinions that can be expressed, and the words that could be used to express them, reduce further and further. We are thus in a situation where the political class simply has no idea what to say if the issue is one where there is not an approved verbal formula ready and waiting. You push a button but only nonsense comes out…..

    ….I’m not sure that it is really possible for a society without a common culture to survive for very long. The Party, unlike in 1984, is incompetent and cannot stand up to serious organised opposition. But that’s the problem, there isn’t any. Oh, there’s plenty of opposition, but it is disorganised, often at cross-purposes, and doesn’t know what it wants. All the Party has to do to survive is to be minimally less incompetent and divided than the groups opposing it.

    *Simply because any competent journalist across the collective West is either assassinated, arrested, imprisoned, cancelled, outlawed, vilified or denied any scope whatsoever to inform the public.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading