Red Tory plumbs new racist depths hot on heels of offending Bangladeshis with unfounded comments
Keir Starmer, not satisfied with appalling Bangladeshis and all anti-racists with his deportation comments this week, has plumbed new racist depths by saying he would work with fascist Marine Le Pen’s ‘National Rally’ (formerly National Front) party against the small boats used by desperate refugees to reach the UK, according to the Telegraph:
Every day, Labour becomes more and more a racist endeavour. In his eagerness to appeal to the racist right, Starmer is embracing, and opening the door wider for, outright fascism in the UK – while supporting the fascist, genocidal Israeli regime.
SKWAWKBOX needs your help. The site is provided free of charge but depends on the support of its readers to be viable. If you’d like to help it keep revealing the news as it is and not what the Establishment wants you to hear – and can afford to without hardship – please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal or here to set up a monthly donation via GoCardless (SKWAWKBOX will contact you to confirm the GoCardless amount). Thanks for your solidarity so SKWAWKBOX can keep doing its job.
If you wish to republish this post for non-commercial use, you are welcome to do so – see here for more.
And yet, imagine there are STILL some who hope somehow OBVIOUS bad news Starmer will be something other that what he has OPENLY shown he is over and over again.
Why? Partly because, despite being a VILEST type of Tory parasite, 👺☢️👺☢️👺☢️Starmer waves a red rosette and abuses the LABEL Labour.
ALL who pray, PRAY that we r spared the ABOMINATIONS that r bad Bad BAD news Starmer & Co!
ALL who trust in something other than prayers, then do so with as much STRENGTH and FOCUS u can muster!!
The unceasing dishonesty , cynicism, and all round pure wickedness displayed so far by Starmer & Co. is as NOTHING compared to what they will unleash on the many if they get their grubby claws on power.
⚠️🪱☢️⚠️🪱☢️⚠️🪱☢️
Even those astonishingly STILL blinding and deafening themselves with their own hope, will be surprised by the concentrated rightwing toxin that is Starmer & Co.
🥀🥀A day most tragic🥀🥀
It would have been newsworthy if Keir Starmer had said that if he became PM that he would refuse to work with the head of state of our closest neighbour on the ‘small boats’ issue. 🤔
He won’t just “work with” the fascist-right, he’s an essential enabler of it.
(Please see my 8.37 am. post below.)
Starmer’s true degenerate and villainous nature is not yet fully appreciated yet – not even by the noble souls to whom he lied and back-tracked to steal a political party.
Starmer’s premiership will make it all abundantly clear, and, as NVLA says”we’re all going to be poorer with less services” and even less democracy (his Davos/WEF/Trilateral Commission paymasters are frightened of it).
Le Pen is not the head of state. She is not even the Prime Minister – the second round has yet to be determined. Besides which the French Head of State is the President not the Prime Minister.
Though it is hardly surprising that someone pontificating from afar (allegedly) would be so utterly clueless as to make such a basic error. Which is something we have come to expect from you on a daily basis Billy.
Question is, what exactly does the descriptive heading “working with the head of state” mean in this context?
What actual practical steps, if any, does it entail?
Will it apply to all refugees or only certain categories?
Will, for example, people fleeing Western caused destruction from those areas of the world considered by the Western elites to be “The Jungle” be the only target or will (sensible) draft dodgers from what is considered “The Garden” (404) be included as well rather than being given an inconsistent free pass as they are at present?
Having already preferred to aid and abet a dog whistle Brexit by engineering a Conservative victory in 2019 with the express purpose of expelling all variants of the political left (including the Social Democracy strain) from any political representation – preferring to give a free ride to Farage over a non-Caucasian Labour candidate in Clacton (how racist can a LP leader be?) effectively disenfranchsing Labour voters in that constituency – will Starmer in such a “working together” endevour emulate Le Pen’s little rant by expelling all those subjectively defined as an “enemy” from the UK?*
Just like he has from the Labour Party.
Will he and La Pen cease UK/French involvement in the creation of refugees by no longer using the military to bomb their Countries back to the Stone Age?
Will he and Le Pen stop the UK & US and other alphabet agencies from their sponsorship of “Moderate” Jihadists and similar – who, for example, have been allowed free access to the UK to plant bombs and murder UK citizens because it suits the Security State to protect them.
If not both are wasting their own and our time. As well as any votes given to them.
*At which point the questions detailed in my post of 10:40 am this morning come into play.
Dave – “Sir Keir Starmer said he would be willing to work with Marine Le Pen’s far-right party if it wins the French election, saying “that’s what serious government is about”.
And the actual pertinent matter of what exactly does the descriptive heading “working with the head of state” mean in this context?
Or is that one too difficult for you Billy?
Dave – It would have been newsworthy if Keir Starmer had said that if he became PM that he would refuse to work with the
head of stategovernment of our closest neighbour on the ‘small boats’ issue.Just for you, I have corrected my mistake above. The principal remains the same.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
And yet, Billy, you still fail to deal with the contextual issues – as set out in my posts – of what does that actually mean in practice.
Choosing, as usual, to focus on either secondary or general issues in your comfort zone.
Dave – I have no idea what you are blathering on about, do you?
If you can’t read plain English Billy, that’s your problem.
Or are you simply making the usual pathetic excuses again to avoid facing the issues raised? It’s not exactly quantum mechanics.
Dave – It would have been newsworthy if Keir Starmer had said that if he became PM that he would refuse to work with the
head of stategovernment of our closest neighbouron the ‘small boats’ issue.Just for you, I have corrected my mistake above
Have you, indeed? The Irish republic says ‘hello’. 🇮🇪
And what’s this ‘our closest neighbour’ business? Moved France a few thousand miles west, have they?
🥀🥀🥀SH, it is accomplished. Your abomination is in the place it should NEVER have been allowed to even get close.
Now, all will see +/or FEEL the predictable horrors flowing from the OBVIOUSLY despicable establishment tool beneath contempt that is Sir Keith Starmer.
The Few: 666. The Many: NIL
Steveh, do you think that JC might stand?
I’ll work with Le pen on small boats, says starmer
There’ll be plenty preferring he/they did. Perhaps he could use the tools daddy used to make, on them.
The Toffee…….Hopefully Starmer will set sail in a small boat with Le Pen and never come back.
As for this
https://skwawkbox.org/2024/07/01/video-labour-front-bencher-dismisses-doctors-complaint-he-was-bombed-by-israel/
I’m afraid had that been me, I might not have have been so forgiving. PTSD can cause people to react in different ways 😙🎶
Completely off-topic:
For anyone interested in geopolitical history, particularly in light of current developments, I highly recommend this most recent video from Hikma’s YouTube channel tracing Iran’s 3 revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries, including how British, Russian and US interests variously featured in these episodes.
Iran’s Revolutionary History | Middle East Documentary
PW, thank you.
We shouldn’t be surprised that PM Starmer would work with the French National Front. As a centrist altlanticist, he might as well be cut from the same cloth as Le-Pen, et a.
Owen Jones said on a Twitter/X page “France is a gruesome case study in how centrists acted as the handmaidens of the far right… Under Macron, France became a cauldron of disillusionment which the far right fed off…”
A current naked capitalism item is investigating the centrists’ anti-democratic determination to impose ever-more austerity and support Nato’s never-ending proxy wars is the real issue here.
Bought ‘centrist’ politicians like Sir Keir, Sunak, Macron, Von Der Leyen are the cancerous cells in our bodies-politic. They cause the right-wards drift and democratic despair that they then claim a unique ability to remedy. Charlatans.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/the-eu-doom-loop-embracing-more-austerity-will-cause-further-rightward-shift.html
He’s lying. The immigration will not be stopped, and the backlash that is inevitable will not be pleasant. ONS census 2021 shows the disparity between UK born citizens and those who were not concerning social housing. Regardless of your political position, I’m sure you can understand this will upset folks.
As for the lies, immigration is being used to cancel out the inflation caused by the free money during COVID shenanigans. An extra £600 billion was injected into the true economy (which is why we have rampant inflation). It’ll take about 7 years for them to soak up this cash. And they need at least another 6 million too…
TL:DR we’re all going to be poorer with less services to go around to reduce inflation. Human quantitive easing.
The only way to stop the boats will be to stop migration at source by ensuring that young people have opportunities to lead a decent life in their home countries.
Instead what the West does is exporting wars and poverty to the Global South in its relentless pursue of profits.
The more misery we export the higher will be the number of economic migrants from the Global South desperate to reach Europe in order to survive.
We need to appreciate how desperate they must be to embarke on a dangerous journey north and for what: to live in a small room with 3 other desperate souls? to live from hand to mouth?
Sorry, but this only makes sense when applied to Europe. Whilst America has always been an agitator, its never really felt any consequence for decades (apart from the few they needed for jobs folks won’t do). Now they’re getting folks from China, never mind Africa. You need to look at the ONS data. It’s unpleasant reading.
I watched a video this morning of Spanish pensioners searching bins for food. Seems living hand to mouth is closer to home than anyone of us would like.
Well said Maria. The West/NATO caused the boat people problem by destroying Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya. These corrupt politicians need to look in the mirror.
We’re buggered any way one looks at it. There again we’ve got Keef and change.
Here is a current clip of Le Pen at a rally:
https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1807756172239224854
“The French who adapt the ideology of the enemy.”…”must be expelled.”
Raises some pertinent questions:
Who/what is the “enemy”?
What ‘ideologies’ are on the table? – Is it only Islam? or will anyone defined as the political ‘left’ be next? (just like in 1930’s Germany?)
Who decides/defines these terms?
To what end?
Will this expulsion and related charges include the ‘foreigners’ ie US/UK/French & other Western elites agencies/personnel & their alphabet agencies who created, nurtured, funded and sustained these “Moderate” Islamic Jihadists & the Muslim Brotherhood?
Or are we going to see the usual double standards & hypocrisy of the so called “Rules Based Order” [we make the rules, you obey the orders] once again in operation?
The only thing missing from this clip is a rendition of the song ‘Tomorrow belongs to me.’
We only have to look at the massive support in Israeli society right now for the elimination by whatever means – driving into the desert or complete extermination – of anyone not a Zionist (including the many small Christian sects/Communities) to see where the kind of scapegoating dog whistle approach being taken by both Le Pen & Starmer will take us.
Starmer is even smoothing the ground for Farage and his ilk in Clacton.
For someone who clearly believes in supply and demand when it comes to what passes for economics – which is not a science in the West but a superstitious belief system – Starmer is remarkably ignorant on the very obvious solution to this refugee “problem”.
To eliminate the supply (refugees) you simply cut off the demand. Starting with a complete cessation of bombing into the Stone Age all those Countries who won’t cry uncle and give up their resources.
As former CIA analyst Larry Johnson observes today:
“I also am certain that there are many countries around the world chortling over the spectacle unfolding in the United States because, in the past, they have been targeted with harsh rhetoric and sanctions for failing to uphold what U.S. officials deemed to be the values of democracy.
The United States has now earned the right to Shut the Fuck Up! We, referring to my fellow citizens, no longer have the moral standing to lecture any other government on human rights or election integrity. We are like a raging alcoholic trying to enforce a no-drinking-beer campaign on others. We would be better off joining Alcoholic Anonymous and getting our own act together.”
An analysis just as valid for puppet regimes in the UK and across the EU/NATO.
Good to see people from the Green Party asking the question as to why people are on the boats in the first place:
To escape poverty, war and climate emergency.
Also, good to see Adrian Ramsay clearly answer ‘no’ when asked if he would ‘press the nuclear button’.
An insight into the mindset of wee steve h and the petulant imbeciles he supports
https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2024/07/behold-new-entitled-elite.html?m=1#comment-form
Pay special heed to the last couple of paragraphs, it sums the shower up succinctly.
These things can usually be put aside as some sort of irksome trait, but there can be NO excuse for covering for child sex abusers, as they are wont to do.
Seen the last few minutes of Ramsey on the beeb last week (the night farage was on just after and got deservedly laughed at, the humongous, chicken-headed blert)
Ramsey, I thought, did very well. I was quite impressed, and saw very little (if any) difference between his/green policies and corbynomics.
And he’s been left alone by the MSM. Expect that to change if they win a few more seats (and i hope they do).
Haven’t had any green mailshot/literature/leaflet through the door, so nowt to put in me window.
And on that subject, I’ve noticed the (uppity and aloof) whoppers across the road from me haven’t bothered with their ‘vote labour’ posters this time about. Hopefully they’ve seen sense.
What are the odds on the Greens winning in your constituency?
Dafuqs it to do with you, nonce-protecting liar?
You don’t even reside in the UK (so you say – getting a bit blowy by you jist now, is it?) nor will you be betting on the outcome in MY constituency.
You won’t tell anyone what policy/(policies) persuaded you to vote for “the best of the bad bunch”; nor have you ever once offered a difference between smarmerism & outright conservatism.
If you want questions answered I suggest you afford the same courtesy to others.
Until then, be quiet, unless addressed directly.
Toffee – I thought that you would be voting for Bimpson 🌞
Thought wrong then didn’t ya, you postulating, presumptuous prune.
.
You’re usually accusing me of being self-confessed tory boy but you haven’t even got the wherewithal to back that up. so have opted for the lazy choice, thinking you know it all, when in reality you know NOTHING.
Then you’re complaining that you don’t ask where I live. Seems you already know exactly where I live – because unlike you, I make no secret of it.
Nothing to hide – nothing to fear.
Now, with that in mind, how about you enlighten us all as to the policy/policies that convinced you to vote for the best of the bad bunch…?
What were the odds on Tony Blair being elected when he was Labour’s candidate at the 1982 Beaconsfield by -election?
Winning is not everything. Had Blair not fought that by-election, then it is difficult to see how he would have become prime minister. Blair had a good strategy. There is no doubt about that.
I would call this ‘wider issues’.
I trust this answers your question.
Winning is not everything.
It is to the wee nonce protecting LIAR.
He even says that the shower of shite acted entirely appropriately throughout when they allowed the nonce case thomas dewey to RESIGN instead of dismissing him from their disgustingly corrupt enterprise, and then shut down any & all mention of his – and their – conduct after the event.
That’s what winning means to the wee gobshite and his ilk.
A vote NOT going to DavosStarmer’s Labour is a win. FPTP denies representational democracy to citizens.. So this is the best we can hope for SteveH.
It is only when the wretched starmer liar is Prime Minister that ‘more’ will be possible.
The Video Keir Starmer Does Not Want You To See
Stats for Starmeroids:
https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2024/07/02/broken-britain/
The above link provides a sobering factual and objective assessment of the state of the Country which lays bare the stark effects of the TINA doctrine that anything other than the nonsense that creates the situation described is [to paraphrase]”not viable or credible left wing policies.”
The key question – which will hopefully be tackled in the promised follow up article – is whether or not the policies of what passes for the Labour Party these days will seriously address these structural issues or merely continue to elevate those forces responsible for this situation as the only “viable” and “credible” way of doing anything and everything?
Bottom line – for the simple minded like Billy no mates on this site:
What is ruining the Country and Society – and has been for decades – is not Conservative Government’s per se but neo-liberal policies pursued in tandem by both Conservative and New Labour and Orange Book Lib-Dems.
All the runes – from the misleading Labour Party “Change” Manifesto to regular statements from what passes for leadership across those who would form the Cabinet in the second eleven – is that the rentier forces which are destroying the Country will continue to be sacrosanct under any incoming Government run by Keir Starmer.
There exists no credible evidence that a Starmer led Government will seriously make the necessary course changes to address the causes laid out in the above article.
More NHS privatisation. More borrowed money pumped into ensuring continued profit growth for rentier spivs. More unequal increases in the gaps of both income and wealth as a result of the economic illiteracy of those both running and cheerleading what is falsely sold as the only viable alternative.
Many thanks for this.
Carla Denyer agreed that Starmer had changed the Labour Party, changed it into the Conservative Party!
Interesting piece in the latest edition of Private Eye
Labour candidate in East Thanet, Polly billington – former bbc journalist and special advisor to Ed Milliband during his successful labour leadership campaign – may have cause to regret having helped out an old mate in his time of need.
Prior to being selected as candidate for East Thanet, billington was a councillor in the London borough of Hackney and close personal ally of elected mayor Philip glanville.
Glanvilles own hopes of a future in parliament were dashed when he resigned in disgrace (but like dewey, he wasn’t booted out – TT) last September after having LIED about his relationship with a paedophile councillor [dewey] ( Rotten boroughs, passim).
Glanville then disappeared into obscurity until January this year when he re-emerged as “director of advocacy and engagement” at UK100, a firm that lobbies in favur of Net Zero within local government.
UK100 was set up by Glanville former Hackney colleague Billington in 2016, and she remained as chief exec until selected for the Thanet candidacy. She appears to have thrown her old labour colleague a lifeline.
How well this will go down with the voters of East Thanet remains to be seen”
Will keef be intervening and withdrawing support for billington; glanville having brought the party into disrepute surely puts into question billingtons guilt by association something keef has EXPELLED other, far more upstanding members for. (Jamie o’Driscoll immediately comes to mind).
NO. Not a bit of it. Further proof keef will happily tolerate pederasts, their protectors – and those who employ their protectors.
But NOT left-leaning candidates who might’ve once liked a tweet from the greens, or a tweet that the non-jewish JLM decree is/was antisemitic – despite that tweet having been made by a jew.
And it’s no surprise all to discover that billington worked for the BBC, another paedophile-infested institution.
One pederast protecting shower of shite, that cabal. May they ALL burn.
Jamie DRISCOLL (No ‘o’ – apologies)
So, today is the day. Since it’s safe to conclude that labour will take power because of the Tory’s, (not because of themselves) hers a list of the front bench and what they’ve done as a real job
Leader=Senior Lawyer
Deputy leader=Care worker and union rep.
Exchequer=Junior Banking analyst
Education=Junior in local gov.
Home Sec=None
Health=Public sector consultant
Energy=None
Foreign Office=Minor US attorney.
Duchy of Lancaster=None
Minister without portfolio=Junior lawyer.
Paymaster=None.
Justice=Junior lawyer.
Business and trade=None.
DWP=None.
Defence=Journalist.
Transport=Volunteer Special constable.
Culture=Cellist, author.
Party chair=public policy lecturer.
Environment=Publisher
Science=Aid worker
N.Ireland=None.
Scotland=Events and TV management.
Wales=H.R.
A.G.=Lawyer
International development=None.
Chief sec. to treasury=Data privacy lawyer.
Campaign coordinator=None.
Leader of HoC=None.
Noticing a lot of ex military running for MP within the party. That SBS marine who was going to he the youngest ever Brigadier is very, very suspicious.
Stats for Starmeroids:
Labour Vote (Corbyn ) 2017: 12,858,652
Labour vote (Corbyn) 2019: 10,269,076
Labour vote (Starmer) 2024: 9,650,254
Inspiring!
Stats for Starmeroids:
Islington North 2024:
1. Independent: 24,120
2. Labour: 16,873
3. Green 2,660
4. Conservatives 1,950
5. Reform 1, 710
6. Lib-Dems 1,661
7. Other 32
Wat was that about a lost deposit?
Stats for Starmeroids:
2024 UK General Election:
Total Number of Registered Voters = 48,214,128
1. Not voting/Spoiled Papers: 19,664,289*
2. Labour: 9,650, 254
3. Conservative: 6,771,974
4. Reform: 4,076,645
5. Lib Dems: 3,485,570
6. Green: 1,934,554
7. Other Parties Total: 2,738,841
*An increase of 1,621,578 not voting/spoiled papers over the previous 2001 election of 18,022,711. Setting a new record.
Inspiring!
Stats for Starmeroids
https://x.com/YouGov/status/1808458226142196083?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
We asked Labour voters to tell us in their own words the main reason they are backing the party. For the largest number by far the key motivation is ousting the Conservatives
Top 5 reasons
Get the Tories out: 48%
Country needs a change: 13%
Agree with their policies: 5%
To… pic.twitter.com/i76S3Zlghu
— YouGov (@YouGov) July 3, 2024
From the accompanying chart:
– They align with my views: 2%
– I trust the honesty and integrity of the Party: 2%
– They care about ordinary people: 1%
– They are for the working class: 1%
– They will address the cost of living crisis: 1%
– For economic stability: 1%
– Keir Starmer’s leadership: 1%
– Better funding for public services: 1%
Even “Labour” voters don’t believe there will be any meaningful change under this administration.