#Progressweasels’ ‘next left leader’ article DOESN’T show they’re ‘snobs’. Just scum.

There’s much outrage today on social media over an article on the website of the hard-right Progress faction, by a self-confessed ‘spin-doctor’, that attacks possible future left-wing Labour leadership candidates, for its snobby, sneering attitude toward northern – and particularly female – MPs. Which is true, it’s vile.

But if you read the article carefully, it does not show its author to be a snob – just a hideous excuse for a human being.

Paul Richards

Sure, the writer scoffs at the excellent Becky Long-Bailey’s ‘sociology degree from Manchester Polytechnic‘ and Angela Rayner’s council-estate origins and departure from school without qualifications – but it’s really just naked opportunism: whatever the sleaze thinks he can use to attack a potential future leader that the Blairites wouldn’t like is used without a moment’s concern for humanity, let alone integrity.

The article is pathetic, so rather than quote longer sections here are the originator’s (can’t quite bring myself to say ‘author’) points in a summary that only slightly parodies the loathsome original:

Richard Burgon: too posh and well-connected

Angela Rayner: too common, bit thick, damned by faint praise and maybe a conflicted closet Blairite

Rebecca Long-Bailey: too common, low-rent education

Clive Lewis: mentally unstable (but couched in pseudo-admiration), untrustworthy

John McDonnell: too old, friend of terrorists

Doesn’t matter what your background or your strengths, if you support Corbyn, it will be used against you – your background, your education, your age. Even, contemptibly, your mental health.

The one thing I wouldn’t call Paul Richards is a snob. He’s way lower than that and far less principled. No, I’d choose another four-letter word starting with an ‘S’:


You might think of others.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.


  1. Sounds like the perpetrator of the piece you mentioned (I agree author is far too polite a term in this context) is in the wrong party – with attitudes like that he would be a good fit with the Conservatives – or even UKIP.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: