Uncategorized

How is #TonyBlair spamming 1000s of #Labour members? #DPA breach?

Many of you will – at least after his attempt to sabotage last week’s by-elections – have heard of ex-PM Tony Blair’s Open Britain vanity project, which masquerades as a pro-EU ‘institute’ but is essentially just an attempt to make himself relevant again by levering himself back onto the domestic political scene and to promote defunct policies and worldview that almost all the public and the vast majority of Labour members consider, rightly, a mouldy relic fit only for the refuse heap.

The SKWAWKBOX has learned that Mr Blair is spamming tens of thousands of Labour members with an appeal for funds and to ask people to sign up to his newsletter.

blair spam.jpg

The request for them to sign up to his newsletter is highly significant – because it’s an acknowledgement that they haven’t yet. Blair has sent this letter unsolicited to a huge number of people – which is pretty much the definition of spam.

Even more crucial, though, is the question of how he’s doing it. These members will have given permission to the Labour Party to contact them – but not to Tony Blair or Open Britain, which are entirely separate entities.

The Data Protection Act 1998 places a duty on ‘data controllers’ not to reveal personal information they hold to a third party without the express permission of the individual concerned. As the holder of information on its 500,000+ members, the Labour Party is a data controller.

If – as seems likely – someone at Labour HQ gave Tony Blair a list of members’ email addresses, then either a or b below and c apply:

a) if Labour as the data controller consented to the disclosure of the data, the Party has committed an offence by doing so without the permission of the subjects and, as General Secretary, Iain McNicol would likely be held ultimately responsible
b) if Labour did not consent, then under section 55, subsection 1 of the Act, the individual employee or representative has committed an offence by disclosing it
c) under the same section of the Act, Tony Blair or his organisation have committed an offence by procuring it

Data protection breaches are serious and reportable incidents. The Labour Party needs to investigate this apparent breach urgently – and has a legal duty to do so – and to report the cause and how it happened to the Information Commissioner’s Office, who has a duty to pursue the appropriate sanctions against whomever is at fault.

Many in this country consider Blair a war criminal and, as the SKWAWKBOX exclusively revealed, he has authorised the use of armed forces personnel, masquerading as police, against UK citizens. It seems the vehicle for his come-back-slash-vanity-project may have made an inauspicious, if unsurprising, start by breaching laws meant to protect us all.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

7 comments

  1. Remember all the fawning profiles about Tony Blair being such a consummate performer because of his mastery of the detail?

    This is a breach of his legislation!
    Legislation that he passed!

  2. It won’t just be Labour members receiving these emails – I get regular emails from Open Britain which I always delete unread. PS you are right that this conduct is unquestionably spamming.

  3. I am being told by people that this was the Better Stronger in Europe campaign which has rebranded.

    1. It is the Britain Stronger in Europe campaign which has rebranded and has half a million emails which perhaps up to 100,000 are Labour members

  4. Did he really believe that we would treat anything he says, with anything other than contempt?
    A man who lied to the country about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction and sent this country to war, killing 179 service personnel, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, should have been tried in a court of law. It’s disgraceful that this didn’t happen.

Leave a Reply to NomatestypeCancel reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading