Lessons from Copeland (and a couple from Stoke)

All too predictably, the media this morning are completely focused on Labour’s defeat last night in Copeland, with questions about Corbyn’s leadership repeated ad nauseam and Stoke treated almost as an irrelevant footnote.Genuine Labour supporters are understandably disappointed, but most are rallying and asking ‘what’s next?’.

Here are a few observations from the by-elections that you’re highly unlikely to hear from a mainstream obsessed with finding reasons for more Corbyn-bashing and the lessons that flow from them for how what many are now calling ‘ordinary Labour’ to take forward.

Taking the fight to..

‘Taking the fight to the Tories’ is a mantra on both sides within the Labour party. But what has become clear during this campaign is that, for the pro-Corbyn left, taking the fight to the Tories means ‘first clean house‘.

From Tony Blair‘s ridiculous ‘rise up against Brexit’ intervention last week and Mandelson‘s follow-ups at the weekend, to the avalanches of anti-Corbyn articles and TV appearances by ‘Labour’ MPs and anti-Corbyn journalists in the days and hours before polling, to Tom Watson‘s ‘two fingers’ to the membership with his ludicrous ‘Dab’ attempt during PMQs and his photo opportunity at London Fashion Week just before polling, to the stream of opportunistic nonsense from red-Tory idiots like Progress’ Richard Angell and Labour First’s Luke Akehurst, one thing is inescapably clear:

The Labour Right wanted Labour to lose both by-elections and did everything it could to cause it – and, having failed in Stoke, is now focusing on Copeland to try to undermine the party, its members and its leadership yet again.

watson-dab

watson-lfw

angell-copeland

akehurst-copeland

A Labour party that continues to struggle on with the saboteur-right in its midst is a Labour party fighting with one hand tied, racing with a huge ball and chain fixed to its ankle.

ball and chain.png

Cleaning house has at least three absolutely essential steps:

  • correct the balance of the NEC by removing the two unlawfully-imposed and unelected members the right-wing crowbarred onto it, to facilitate step 2. If that means taking legal action, so be it
  • remove, by whatever means are available, certain key figures among the Labour right. This blog would recommend Watson, McNicol, Dugher, Spellar, Reynolds, Phillips, Austin. Withdraw the whip, expel from the party, whatever it takes
  • force through the much-needed and democratically essential rule change on nominations for leadership candidates, so the right loses all hope of ever excluding a left-wing candidate from any future leadership contest. If they can see no hope of restoring what to them are ‘the good old days’, remaining right-wingers have far less incentive to sabotage Labour’s efforts

When the right talks about focusing on taking the fight to the Tories, it is nothing more than cover for their plots. It has to end – and if it’s brutal and bloody, it’s a price well worth paying so that Labour can fight as Labour, not as some sickly chimera of genuine Labour people and values spliced with crypto-Tories determined to win a graft vs host battle even if it kills both.

If Labour fights as itself, unencumbered by those prepared to see it fail if it lets them return to their prestige and influence, the battle is winnable.

Communication and presence

Labour’s convincing win in Stoke last night, over a UKIP that – regardless how it now tries to downplay it – fully expected to win at the start of the campaign, was primarily a triumph of digital campaigning – with a clear target in the UKIP leader – with a strong helping hand from a well-supported ground campaign.

By contrast, in Copeland, which has much poorer broadband coverage and perceived strengths on both sides – NHS for Labour and nuclear for the Tories (wrongly, as they have studiously avoided any promises about the future of Sellafield and are planning raids on workers’ pensions) – there was less opportunity for the online campaign to gain traction.

Set against the ubiquitous nature of the mainstream – press and TV – that can reach places with wide geography and poor online communications and which amorally and unequivocally push Tory themes and narratives, the online message couldn’t have the impact it would in other places.

So, what to do about it?

Labour’s traditional strength has been as a community presence, organising support for local people, events around which communities can coalesce etc. This was one of the main casualties under Tony Blair and since – and it’s what Labour must return to.

It needs to do this everywhere, but if it’s to have the connection and impact that its policies, sense and moral superiority deserve, it’s absolutely essential in places like Copeland.

The bad news is that this takes time and effort. The good news is that, with 550,000 members and counting, Labour is better positioned to do it successfully than it has been in decades – as long as the new membership is willing to do it.

Combined with this, Labour needs to work out ways to win the communications war. Labour’s left consistently ‘wins’ on Twitter; Facebook is more or less a neutral zone; the mainstream is owned by the right-wing Establishment more than ready to support Labour right-wingers toward its overall goal of controlling the narrative and fooling enough people into thinking there is no credible alternative.

Winning Twitter and holding its own on Facebook is nowhere near enough if the genuine-alternative left wants to swing places like Copeland under a barrage of pro-government, pro-Establishment narrative from BBC News and the commercial press and broadcasters.

A better, more co-ordinated approach – combined with community presence – is urgently necessary. If it means sacking, for example, whoever was behind last autumn’s ridiculous ‘glitterballs’ idiocy and replacing that person and others with people who understand messaging, fine.

It can be done

In the midst of all of the current nonsense, it will be easy for Labour members of good will to lose heart. It should, but doesn’t, go without saying that no genuine supporter of a real Labour alternative can allow her- or himself the luxury of depression or discouragement – to permit those is to give the saboteurs what they’re hoping for.

The most important lesson coming out of Stoke is that, when Labour’s members and representatives get it right, it can be done. The media machine was fully expecting to be dancing on the corpse of the Labour left today after defeat in Stoke as well as in Copeland.

Nuttall would not have run if he didn’t think he was going to win. The media have been talking up his chances since he stood and UKIP’s ‘threat’ to Labour long before that.

That everything didn’t go according to the Establishment’s script is down to the hard work of huge numbers of people, both online and on the ground, inspired by Corbyn’s integrity, authenticity and vision – and to Corbyn’s nous in his approach to the Brexit bill earlier this month. To win convincingly in a ‘leave’ stronghold against a constant media barrage was huge.

Labour didn’t get it right in Copeland, not quite – although if polls depicting catastrophic Labour falls in support were remotely accurate, Copeland would have been lost by a landslide and Stoke would have been unwinnable.

So there is neither room nor cause for discouragement. It can be done.

The policies, ethics and authenticity are there. People – even in places like Copeland – are desperate for different and better than the Tories can offer.

If Labour gets its ground game a little better and broadens its communications strategy so those people can hear the policies, ethics and authenticity – and gets rid its rotten wood so it can be its natural self unencumbered – it will win.

That’s what we should be learning from Copeland. And Stoke. Let’s do it.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers to be viable. If you can afford to, please click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

21 responses to “Lessons from Copeland (and a couple from Stoke)

  1. ‘Even in places like Copeland’?? What does that even mean? Interesting comment, considering even this blog (which, don’t get me wrong, I rely on for some great journalism and dedication) didn’t write nearly as many articles (or any? I didn’t see any, but I accept there may have been some) about the by-election in Copeland compared with those for Stoke?

    You’re absolutely right, however, the campaign in Stoke was probably totally reliant on the digital campaigns which were brilliant – but why didn’t this happen around the Copeland campaign? Especially when there are some hugely newsworthy things going on there with the dive of the NHS services, some issues with the Moorside development and the usual nightmarish living conditions caused by endemic poverty in the face of a Tory govt.

    Love the blog though. Keep up the good work!!

    Like

    • Btw, there were articles on Copeland. This blog focused tactically on Stoke as it was best positioned for that, but contributed where feasible on Copeland while others shouldered the bulk of that task.

      Like

  2. One of the reasons I was persuaded to vote for toxic Tom Watson for deputy leader was his promises to get a rebuttal unit up and running as soon as practicable and to get the unions involved in countering the MSM. Where are they? He spends most of his time either plotting against the leadership or in Israel on his Labour Friends of Israel work. Speaking of which does anybody know what his LFI £1m slush fund is for? Or what he intends to use his latest £500k donation from Max Mosely for? He is a liability to Labour and has to have the whip removed before it’s too late.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Good to see the responses I saw and contributed to online to the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire analysis of yesterday’s results. he’s another one who needs to get real.

    Like

  4. The street interviews in Copeland gave the same answers as for the Brexit voters: they’ve never done anything for us. Quite right! The Blairites caused this disaffection so that even Jeremy couldnt change it because he’s in the London bubble. The South East have always disregarded the North’s problems, even the Labour Govts. It’ll take a lot of persuasion to overcome that prejudice the north have towards the south.

    ________________________________

    Like

    • Some of that prejudice is not justified. There are plenty in the London area in poor housing, with kids in schools that are in a state of bad repair and barely able to keep body and soul together after paying the extortionate rent. Yes the Blairites caused the disaffection but they caused disaffection in the south as well. We have more in common than we have differences. No need for prejudices.

      Liked by 2 people

    • What the heck do you think they do for the south? I live in East Sussex one of the only countries in the UK with NO motorways crap infrastructure, how many motorways and good rail links do you have?

      all we have is more and more twits that close their doors, but harp on about community and don’t give a fig about anyone. The North has some although low-paying jobs. We do not there is NO industry only a very limited service or caring jobs because of the Huge elderly Tory voting community.

      So I ask again why do you think we have it so great down here? Personally, I would rather live up north where people at least care a little about there community and fellow man.

      Like

  5. It’s been a depressing day paticularly when trying to avoid the constant verbal diarrhoea from MSM on radio, TV and no doubt the rags, although I haven’t bought one of those in 25 years! But tomorrow is another day! as someone said somewhere so we must pick ourselves up, raise our leftie heads high and fight even harder, but you are absolutely right Corbyn needs to clean up the shop and your list is just about right!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Lessons from Copeland (and a couple from Stoke) – It could be you·

  7. Pingback: Garston/Halewood CLP demands removal of unlawful NEC members | The SKWAWKBOX·

  8. Pingback: If you want to help Corbyn – and Corbyn’s Labour – read and share this | The SKWAWKBOX·

  9. Pingback: Exclusive: electoral expert – Copeland by-election ‘unlawful’, count ‘suspect’ | The SKWAWKBOX·

  10. When you have parasites growing in your guts you have to sedate them and purge them with strong laxatives and deposit them into the sewers system where they belong. Medical analogy. The body politic will return to good health and can recover it’s strength and grow exponentially.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Pingback: Blairites use community leaflet as pretext to threaten ANOTHER CLP suspension | The SKWAWKBOX·

  12. Pingback: Is Labour HQ making it hard for CLPs to contact new members? | The SKWAWKBOX·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s