REFORM: The ‘independent’ Think Tank that wants us to think its a charity that drives the thinking behind NHS privatisation – backed by over THIRTY multinational corporations.

Great article on Reform. Deeply damaging that one of its founders is now one of David Cameron’s chief advisors on health – foxes in the chicken coop yet again. I did an article on Reform myself not too long ago – here’s a link in case you want more on this topic: https://skwalker1964.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/tories-pose-as-independent-charity-to-push-for-nhs-privatisation/

Grannie's Last Mix

ATIVE

_64124769_64124768   COMING SOON: JEREMY AND FRIENDS

 circlewebdownload (2)                                          download (3)                download (4)download (5)download (6)download (7)images (1)

Reform Research Trust – Charity Number: 1103739 – has been reported to the Charities Commission by Andrew Robertson, the investigative journalist behind Social Investigations, an organisation that specialises in in-depth research into political matters of social interest.

download      Reform is a free market think tank, whose mission according to their website, is to ‘set out a better way to deliver public services and economic prosperity.’ They are also an official charity, although, as Robertson demonstrates, not in the traditional sense. The Oxford English Dictionary describes a charity as ‘an organisation set up to provide help and raise money for those in need’  and according to the Charity Commission ‘the guiding principal of charity…

View original post 1,998 more words

6 responses to “REFORM: The ‘independent’ Think Tank that wants us to think its a charity that drives the thinking behind NHS privatisation – backed by over THIRTY multinational corporations.

  1. Pingback: REFORM: The 'independent' Think Tank that wants...·

  2. Did you see last few days in the Torygraph newspaper that apparently the police are now investigating the ‘hundreds’ of midd Staffs death with a view to criminal prosecution.?

    Like

    • They feel under some obligation. I predict they will not find very much of interest to them. If they did, all police forces in the UK would have to look into any hospital with “excess deaths” in the same way. Since the concept of ” excess deaths” is derived from HSMRs – that’s by definition half the hospitals in the country, or probably more because the only ones you could exclude are those who have never been above 100 in the last 15 years.

      Like

      • Yes. And even in those hospitals that have never been over 100, there can still be avoidable deaths or deaths due to negligence. Even the best care isn’t perfect, and worldwide about 6% of deaths are thought to be ‘avoidable’, even though most would have died hours or days later. But it’s nonsense to ascribe blame for most.

        Hundreds of people died at Mid Staffs during the period in question – and at every other hospital in the world. Investigating hundreds doesn’t mean there was fault in hundreds. The last police inspection concluded there were no cases to answer. Of course, this isn’t a perspective that the press want to present..

        Like

  3. Pingback: REFORM: The 'independent' Think Tank that wants...·

  4. Pingback: Dear @jeremycorbyn, these MPs supported £18.5k to *UKIP*. Pls kick ’em out | The SKWAWKBOX·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s