Uncategorized

Theresa May breaks law in #BBCQT special #GE17

may bbcqt

Apart from some desperate spinning by the Tories and their pet media – including an email from party chair Patrick McLoughlin criticising Corbyn’s lack of enthusiasm for incinerating millions – there’s a huge consensus that Jeremy Corbyn won last night’s BBC Question Time special by a distance, in spite of aggression by a number of Tory plants in the audience who were allowed more questions than anyone else.

Even some right-wing commentators agreed:

https://twitter.com/timothy_stanley/status/870746774763433984

Theresa May was unable to do more than repeat slogans – even in answer to a questioner who said she always answered with slogans – and looked wooden, insincere and callous.

Corbyn looked measured, intelligent, unflappable, compassionate and above all genuine. He also finished the session eager more, whereas Theresa May couldn’t get off-stage fast enough.

But Theresa May wasn’t merely unconvincing and awkward. Her desperation to retrieve her awful campaign was so great that she broke the law during her answers.

May claimed that Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott,

wants to wipe the records of criminals and terrorists from the DNA database. That would mean that we could catch fewer criminals and fewer terrorists.

This is an outright lie.

Ms Abbott has spoken in the past about allowing innocent people’s DNA to be removed from police databases, because it’s an obvious infringement of civil liberties that disproportionately affects people from ethnic minorities. She has never advocated the removal of records of ‘criminals and terrorists’.

This is not a small matter. The Tories routinely lie in their promotional videos and literature, but Theresa May lied on national television about an opposition candidate – to millions of viewers and to the readers of the rags who are repeating the lie this morning.

Here’s what the Electoral Commission website says about it:

ec lie

Point 1.7 makes clear that this is an offence, not just breaching a guideline.

Nobody could credibly argue that claiming Diane Abbott wants to help criminals and terrorists commit their crimes is not a ‘false statement about the personal character’ of the Shadow Home Secretary – nor that Theresa May didn’t do it ‘knowingly’.

Tories lie. It’s what they do – it’s in their political DNA. But the depth and frequency of their desperate personal attacks on Labour figures – even to the extent of breaking the law on national television – betrays not only their complete moral and intellectual bankruptcy but also their real, growing terror that their pride is going to see them out on their ear come the morning of 9 June.

Let’s make sure it happens.

The SKWAWKBOX is provided free of charge but depends on the generosity of its readers. If you found this information helpful and can afford to, please do click here to arrange a one-off or modest monthly donation via PayPal. Thanks for your support so this blog can keep bringing you information the Establishment would prefer you not to know about.

16 comments

  1. Ah, yeah – But what may meant was those innocents on the list are all POTENTIAL criminals & terrorists…I mean, nobody gets arrested for bugger-all by our brave plod.

    Nowt to hide = nowt to fear (And all that bollocks.)

    1. Rubbish, the people on the database can be there for thousands of reasons,being raped, being ruled out of a crime when evidence has been contaminated at a crime scene etc etc!!

  2. “Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 specifies that it is a criminal offence to make or publish a false statement of fact about the personal character or conduct of an election candidate. The purpose of making or publishing this false statement must be seen to be to affect how many votes the candidate will get.

    Section 106 thus specifies that, in this offence, it must be a distinct statement of fact as opposed to an expression of opinion or comment about a candidate.”

    http://www.inbrief.co.uk/media-law/defamation-of-election-candidates/

  3. Sadly it’s unlikely that this would be viewed as an attack on Diane Abbott’s personal character even though, like most Tory bullshit, it’s factually incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from SKWAWKBOX

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading